Sunday, 30 September 2007

Shaping the future - Irish style

The recent opening of the all-black school in Balbriggan (pictured!) shows how effortlessly we emulate the UK's multi-racial educational success story. This has lead to a situation where blacks (African-Caribbean, to use the acceptable term) have persistently and drastically fallen behind whites in grade performance. And far from closing, the gap has widened over the last 15 years.
The UK government's most recent statistics on school exclusions showed black pupils were six times more likely to be permanently excluded than their white counterparts due to various offences and under-performance.

A recent BBC Newsnight piece visited the UK's five worst sink-hole schools and earnestly sought some common denominator. None was found. Apart that is from the one staring them in the face. The students were about 95% black. But that can't be mentioned. It should be obvious that when you start fooling, not only others, but yourself as well, there's no way the problem can be solved.

And the all-black schools here may not be a one-off or event temporary. According to the Commission for Racial Equality in the UK, black boys may have to be separated from classmates to help improve school performance. Something to do with 'self esteem'. Translation: when they see white kids doing better it makes them feel bad, so rather than improve scores, get them a new school where they can all be bad together. The idea is being considered, but, hilariously, may be ruled out due to its possible contravention of anti-racism laws!

I love that.

And a report by the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) published in October showed the achievement gap between white pupils and their African-Caribbean classmates had doubled since the late 1980s. And this despite an avalanche of special measures and all kinds of affirmative action.

They just don't get it, do they? And they never will as long as they keep fooling themselves (see this post). And needless to say, Ireland, which has never learned anything from the success/failures of other countries, is (not so) merrily cavorting down the same path. Watch these little angels in 12 years time - from a safe distance, of course.

Friday, 28 September 2007

Immigration update

The Irish Times is probably the main cheerleader for diversity and multiculturalism. A random review of its pages today is therefore all the more significant.

Item: On its 'police page' (p.2.) it refers to three cases, two of which (murder and child assault) involve foreign nationals, whilst the origins of the third perpetrator (drug smuggling) isn't mentioned. If this turned out to be another 'foreign national' it'd hardly be a surprise.

Item: Black taxi drivers complain that many passengers won't travel with them because they're black. Local drivers say passengers have had 'bad experiences' with black drivers.

Item: Radio comment on deportation of Nigerian asylum seeker leads to complaints to the Broadcasting Complaints Commission.

Item: The Migrants' Rights Centre (one of a myriad of such publicly-funded organizations) complains that many immigrants have to 'buy' their jobs and are often abused, under-paid etc. (Undoubtedly true).

These are the only references in the paper to immigrants. What have they all in common?


That's not to say the immigrants are to blame, but the net effect is trouble. As my earlier post today underlined, there's always trouble and disruption when you introduce large numbers of visually and culturally different people into the existing population.

Why can't we do something about it?


Walking through my small town this morning was a salutary experience. It seemed that 10-20% of those on the street were black or 'of Middle-Eastern appearance'. They stony-faced, looking straight ahead, locals exactly the same.

Item: two blacks come into the coffee shop. Conversation stops, then slowly resumes

Item: Black woman, trailed by a swarm of kids, leaves a supermarket with laden-down trolley. Local hardman points out loudly "and we're paying for all of that". Woman looks stonily ahead.

Genuinely - I'm not in any sense condoning this kind of behaviour.

The point is - this is what happens when large numbers of visibly and culturally different people enter a local population. And as we now know through an avalanche of empirical evidence, this will only get worse as time goes on.

What mugs we are.

Thursday, 27 September 2007

How life moves on!

Today, returned to the Island of Saints and Scholars I find myself in a reflective mood. Tempus fugit, time flies, our time here on earth is so short. I hope these pictures help you share my reflective and philosophical mood.

Who said.....?
"We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population. They're shitting their pants with fear. I love it!"
A: Jose Guitterez, Professor of Political Science at the University of Texas (That's correct, the University of Texas)

Monday, 24 September 2007

Not a dry eye in the room

Somebody once said that you'll never go bust underestimating the American public.This has been graphically endorsed in a recent stunt by the egregious Rudi ("Rudi da Fireman") Guliani. This slimeball was addressing the NRA (National Rifle Association) and was seeking to address their concerns about his Christian credentials.

Not surprising, as Guliani has been married three times, as has his latest wife, and has made a habit of humping his secretaries. Even his own children (by his various wives) wont campaign for him. And the NRA ("In guns we trust") don`t like that, being firm believers in Jesus, family values, and shooting anything that moves. Da Fireman had also called the NRA a bunch of fanatics - at an earlier time when trying to get elected in New York where the NRA aren't too popular. So he had to burnush his credentials with this audience.

So, in mid-speech, the phone rang. "Oooh, it's from my dear wife" he trilled, presumably referring to his latest one. There then followed a series of cringe-making intimacies ("yes dearest, I love you darling, how I miss you, sweetheart") that would make a moonstruck teenager blush.

But it worked - there was hardly a dry eye in the room.

If this had happened in Europe there wouldn't have been a dry eye in the room either, because everyone would have been hysterical with laughter. How in the name of Jesus can Americans fall for this kind of thing? Is there any hope?

Thursday, 20 September 2007

Church defends revenue base - update

Your Savant has pointed out in some earlier posts, here and here, how the Curch is going to great and imaginative lengths to defend its dwindling revenue base.

Look below for what SS UberPope Benedikt has come up with. Should get the crowds streaming back and parting with their money like the good old days.

Who said... ?(1)

"Conscience is that inner voice that tells us that - someone is looking"

A: HL Menken

Who said... ?(2)

"My feeing as a Christian points me to my Lord and Saviour as a fighter.As a Christian I have a duty to my own people"

A: Adolf Hitler!! (maybe he said it to "Pope Ben" when he was in the Hitler Youth?)

Wednesday, 19 September 2007

We've sussed the EU's immigration policies

Keep in mind the following two pieces of information, then read on:

1: The London Times reveals that Mohammed (in its various spelling forms) is now the second most common name for baby boys in Britain

2: “Soon we will take power in this country. Those who criticize us now, will regret it. They will have to serve us. Prepare, for the hour is near.” - Belgian-based Imam

Now we turn to Franco Frattini, the EU’s ‘Justice’ Commissioner, who is a man long at war with the facts. But his tenuous hold on reality seems to have completely deserted him when he claims that Europe needs an additional 20 million African and Asian asylum seekers. He says we’re competing with Australia and the US!


To round it off he wants us not to refer to immigration. It’s mobility now. Well, that’s all right then.

Given the horrendous results of mass immigration to Europe (see my posts tagged ‘immigration’) I’ve often wondered how our leaders, especially the EU mandarins, could willingly support this form of self-destruction. If this has become obvious to the deaf, the blind and the brain dead, surely these people must be aware?

After deep reflection my conclusion is this. The European project requires a weakening of the nation state. Self-evidently, the stronger the sense of national identity, the less we’re likely to devolve to a central European administration. It is equally self-evident that importing tens of millions of fast-breeding immigrants with no sense of national identity with their ‘host’ countries achieves this objective in spades (sorry!).

Can this be the reason? Or are they capable of thinking this subtly?

And going back to my two original references, doesn't (1) validate (2)?

Monday, 17 September 2007

China has America by the balls

As my avid readers will know, your Savant has a low opinion of the mainstream media (MSM), who display an uncanny knack for missing the important issues and focusing on the dross. Thus it was to be expected that they largely missed out on one of the most significant occurrences this year.

A few weeks ago senior Chinese Finance Ministry officials announced that if the US didn’t stop pissing them off and threatening them with trade sanctions, they’d dump a large swadge of their dollar reserves on the market. China holds $1 trillion worth of US bonds and bills. Dumping them would bring the dollar crashing down unless the Fed hiked interest rates, which in turn would drive the US economy into deep recession.

Will they do it? Unlikely, as they’d suffer greatly themselves. Could they? Absolutely. And there’s no saying that some less pragmatic leaders might do so in the near future. In any event they’re bound to slow down their purchase of such assets, which pay a relatively low premium. What this means is that the American economy is now utterly dependent on the Chinese, and gets ever more so as the country borrows $15 billion a week to sustain its budget deficits.

America is on the way down, slowly but surely. Swamped by borrowings and drained by military adventures abroad. This then is the legacy of the tough-guy Bush administration, the dream team of chicken hawks who claimed that they were so powerful ‘we create our own reality’.

Hasta la vista, guys!

Switzerland - too much damn democracy

It’s unlikely that the Swiss are anyone’s favourite people. I've never met one who wasn’t humourless, dull as ditchwater, and as tight as a duck’s asshole. Furthermore, they’ve sucked in money from every possible source, no questions asked, no answers given, even when the source is some African kleptocrat or Nazi stashing away treasure stolen from the Jews.

However, it’s also truly a remarkable country. Very wealthy, peaceful, safe, impeccably clean, well-ordered, ultra-democratic and hasn't had a war since William Tell shot the apple of his son’s head in 1307. They’ve done all this in a country covered in mountains and split over three linguistic groups.

But all is not well. Democracy has failed. Well at least in the following case. The Swiss bring their extreme form of democracy down to the level of having a town’s citizens vote to decide on issues of citizenship. In the case under review a refugee from Kosovo was rejected, on the basis of his being a Muslim, and that, being physically disabled he’d be a drain on the town’s resources. They could have added that in Albania/Kosovo, criminality is the only legitimate source of wealth and the refugee would probably immediately bring in the rest of his wives and family. Seems to me like the ultimate endorsement of direct democracy.

But wait. The Federal Commission on Racial Discrimination (groan!) sternly points out that the applicant was rejected because he was a Muslim and disabled. To which your Savant would reply – ‘and your point is?’. Well, their point really is that democracy is fine – while it provides the right answers. Clearly not the case with this one. Their solution? Replace direct democracy with – wait for it – a committee! And who’d choose the members of same committee?

As Steve Sailer says, ‘elect a new people’.

Sunday, 9 September 2007

Islam and the decadent West

One of the palliatives used by the Islamists to dull our senses is to claim that they don’t want to convert the decadent West by violence (even though the Koran specifically encourages this) but by our seeing for ourselves Islam’s moral superiority. Let’s look at how the Nordic countries, as the ultimate embodiment of Western decadence, compare with their Islamic counterparts.

Corruption: Every available source shows the Nordics as the least corrupt, while Islamic countries wallow, with their African counterparts, at the opposite end, mired in corruption at all levels.

Law and accountability: Nordic countries again top the scale here, while almost all Islamic countries are run by unaccountable despots who rule by decree, looting national resources for the benefit of their families and tribes. According to the Koran, a woman’s testimony is worth less than that of a camel while an infidel’s is worth nothing.

Helping the poor and needy: Nordic countries have virtually eliminated poverty for their citizens (apart from refugees from Muslim hell-holes who live on welfare there). They also, per capita, provide the most assistance to poor nations (a total waste, but that's another matter) and are always first to assist during natural disasters around the world. The comparison with the wealthy Gulf states could not be more invidious. As well as giving virtually nothing in foreign assistance (apart from financing Islamic extremists) they incurred international opprobrium by their inaction and unwillingness to help their Islamic brothers after the last tsunami.

Again, behind the glitz of these states, with their gleaming towers and 7 star hotels, lies a demi monde where many natives and all Asian labourers live in virtual destitution, exploited with no recouse, no public services, no rights, no security – as bad as any failed state.

Crime and violence: Despite draconian police powers, Islamic countries are extremely violent, especially within the family. Not surprising, as the Koran allows a husband to beat any of his four wives for not obliging if he fells like getting laid. Check my posts on Sweden to see how the majority of rapes there are committed by Muslim immigrants, who carry Islamic teachings to their logical conclusion.

Sexual morality: Ok, surely here the Muslims must have a case. But I don’t think so. Sure, Nordics flash the flesh and shag each other a lot, but it’s generally fully consensual. Women have full and equal rights. A wealthy Muslim can have four wives at any one time, like Osama bin Laden’s father, trading in the older ones when they get past it, and sending to Syria for nice 15 year old virgins as a replacements. (Remember Mohammed had a 6 year old ‘bride’). Thus wealthy Muslims can and do have a conveyor belt of sexual attractions, capable of satiating even the most jaded palate.

On the other hand, if a woman steps even slightly out of line, e.g. talking to a non-Muslim, she’ll literally get the bullet in an ‘honour’ killing, a delightful practice which now goes on in the West as police turn a culturally attuned blind eye. And, if the wealthy ones take multiple wives, what happens to the other horny men? Well, they don’t get a wife, it’s as simple as that. I've had well-educated Muslims try to convince me that there are orders of magnitude more women than men is Muslim societies. How can you argue with that?

So in conclusion, the Nordics have brought justice, social welfare and cohesion, honesty, rule of law, science and learning, tolerance and transparency to levels never before seen in history. Islamic societies are backward, corrupt, violent dictatorships and kleptocracies. And they have the nerve to try to convert us.

Wednesday, 5 September 2007

Multi-cultural bliss

Ah, the joy of it. Multicultural bliss. Celebrating diversity. It's all over our national media today. Here we see little Ali Mohammed on his first day at school in Dublin. A charming lad, undoubtedly. And equally undoubtedly, he won't be so charming in 15 years time. Ali comes from Somalia. And as your Savant has pointed out before, that hell-hole combines the worst features of Africa - violence, corruption and poverty, with the worst of Islam - poverty, corruption and violence.

Then we see that school in Ennis with a student population 30% non-national. Amazing, the 30%, when you consider that there was hardly a white face to be seen. And needless to say, there were complaints about racism, victimisation etc. - from a fucking Nigerian! A free school, free transport to and from, free uniforms, free, free free. I feel an attack of the vapours coming on.

And as always, there wasn't a dissenting voice to be heard. Despite Robert Putnam banging the last nail into the multi-cultural Coffin of Delusion, the thought police in the mainstream media ensured that reality was kept discretely out of sight.

I just hope one of these bitches gets raped by a Somali on the way home tonight.

Sunday, 2 September 2007

Proof that Viagra works!

Who said...?

"It is better to remain silent and let people think you are a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

A: Oscar Wilde