Thursday, 29 April 2010

Is this the Religion of Peace?

This from John Harrison MBE. MIDSc at a recent meeting in London. There's been much debate about its authenticity but what matters is what it says is true. Anyway, take a read.

Last month I attended my annual training session for maintaining my security clearance in the prison service.There was a presentation by three speakers from the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Muslim faiths, who explained their beliefs.
I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say about the basics of Islam, complete with video.
After the presentations, question time. I directed my question to the Imam and asked:
'Correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a Holy War against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is a command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?'
There was no disagreement with my statement and, without hesitation, he replied, 'Non-believers!' I responded, 'So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not a follower of Allah, so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?'
The expression on his face changed from one of authority to that of 'a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the biscuit tin.' He sheepishly replied, 'Yes.' I then stated, 'Well, I have a real problem trying to imagine Pope Benedict commanding all Catholics to kill Muslims, or the Archbishop of Canterbury ordering all Protestants to do the same in order to guarantee them a place in heaven!'
The Imam was speechless! I continued, 'I also have a problem with being your 'friend' when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me!
Let me ask you a question. Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me in order for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because He will take me to heaven and He wants you to be there with me?'
You could have heard a pin drop as the Imam remained speechless. Needless to say, the organizers of the Diversification' seminar were not happy with this way of exposing the truth about the Muslims' beliefs. Within twenty years, i.e.. 2029, there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.K. to elect a government of their choice, complete with Sharia law.
Everyone in the U.K. Should be required to read this, but with the current political paralysis, tolerant justice system, liberal media and p.c. madness, there is no way this will be widely publicised.
Not sure about his demographic forecasts, but the words of the "Prophet" are totally clear - we're for the chop. How the multi-culti trolls keep blinding themselves to this is beyond my comprehension

Tuesday, 27 April 2010

Ok, finally?

Thank you all for your valued input. I've been touched by the frequency of the requests for my image to make a reappearance. But I've also retained the awareness of the warnings you my friends gave me about the Google Thought Police and the need for a 'respectable' image.

Now, with the industrious assistance of one of my Savantettes I've squeezed myself into a Mini Cooper, thereby shielding my nether regions.

I think this is a good compromise. Tell me you agree.

My dog

Times are tough in Ireland right now so I said I'd try to sign on my dog at my local Social Welfare Office.

The woman said "Dogs are not eligible to draw benefit".

I explained to her that my dog is black, unemployed, idle, can't speak English and has no clue who his dad is. She looked in her policy book to see what it takes to qualify.

He gets his first cheque on Friday.
Damn this is a great country.

Sunday, 25 April 2010

Reasons to be cheerful!

If you’ve tears (of laughter) to shed, prepare to shed ‘em. Yes, in these dark days that are upon us, occasions for joy are rare. But now I bring you one in the person of Amanda Kijera (seen here with her two sprogs) 'civic journalist and activist in Haiti.’
She’s more than an activist. She’s “committed to preserving the dignity of Black men in a world which constantly stereotypes them as violent savages”. She viewed the (guilt)trip to Haiti as an opportunity to fight “the man” on behalf of my brothers.”

Mmm…… What could possibly go wrong?
Well, amazingly, something did. One night “I was held on a rooftop in Haiti and raped repeatedly by one of the very men who I had spent the bulk of my life advocating for.”
If you’re not laughing yet, the next will split your sides.

“I begged him to stop. Afraid he would kill me, I pleaded with him to honor my commitment to Haiti, to him as a brother in the mutual struggle for an end to our common oppression, but to no avail. He didn’t care that I was a Malcolm X scholar. He told me to shut up, and then slapped me in the face. Overpowered, I gave up fighting halfway through the night.”

Oh ma achin' sides!  Can you just imagine this gorilla, muh-dicking for all he's worth, stopping in mid-stroke on learning that she was a Malcolm X scholar?

But it gets even better. It seems white men are to blame for this rape!
Amanda again. “Black men have every right to the anger they feel in response to their position in the global hierarchy, but their anger is misdirected. Because women–and particularly women of color–are forced to bear the brunt of the Black male response to the Black male plight.”

But she rounds off with what is at least consistent with what’s gone before.

“Not once did I envision myself becoming a receptacle for a Black man’s rage at the white world, but that is what I became. While I take issue with my brother’s behavior, I’m grateful for the experience.”

Pour yourself another cuppa and enhjoy!

Friday, 23 April 2010

My new image

Ok, thanks for the loads and loads of suggestions. This is the one I've selected. Celtic, and infuriated, and a big "S" in there. Whadya think?

Wednesday, 21 April 2010

Just a thought...

And they're coming our way.........

Right, left, collect the cheque

Whatever you say about the military, anyone who joins doesn’t do so for the money. For example a Brigadier General in the British Army earns less than £100,000 a year, about the same as a general in the US army.

However, a reward for bravery can supplement these earnings. The Victoria Cross is the highest possible decoration in the British Army. To earn this you have to do something really exceptional, like storm an enemy machine gun nest, have all four limbs blown off in the process, and bite the gunners to death when you get there. For such efforts you’ll be awarded £1500 a year extra.

However, with a bit of ingenuity you can blow such miserly figures away while (not) fighting for your country. Based on latest research I've drawn up a Ten Point Plan to show you how.

1: Become black (this can be difficult, but as you’ll see, it’s well worth it)

2: Become a woman (not anything as difficult as it used to be)

3: Get knocked up (really easy, no need to identify the father, even if you can)

4: Demand special arrangements for looking after your sprog

5: Refuse as inadequate all special arrangements duly offered

6: Go AWOL

7: Eventually just walk out of the service

8: Scream racial and gender discrimination

9: Sue the army on these grounds

10: Walk away with a minimum of £100,000 – tax free

Impossible you say?

Sir, I give you the magnificently named Tilern DeBique, who has done precisely that, and I applaud her for landing this blow for ethnic and womens’ rights. But typically, rather than joining with me, we have a couple of negative begrudgers crawling out from under their stones.

Judith Webb, the highest ranked woman officer ever, snorts “The British Army is admired throughout the world for its toughness, efficiency and cohesion - but these high standards are increasingly under threat from the dogma of political correctness.
With their shrill, ideological certitude, the officials of the modern British state are now imposing on the armed services those fashionable nostrums about workplace rights that are entirely inappropriate for fighting units. The case of single mother Tilern DeBique brilliantly symbolises the politicised ignorance of the realities of military life and operational requirements. “

And good old Ann Widdecombe also, er, ‘weighs’ in with this: “The idea that someone can sue for sex discrimination is simply ludicrous. As for a £100,000 payout, that is just turning a grievance into a lottery win.”
What negativity and begrudgery. Sad.

Tuesday, 20 April 2010

Icelandic earthquake explained

BEIRUT — A senior Iranian cleric says women who wear immodest clothing and behave promiscuously are to blame for earthquakes.

Iran is one of the world's most earthquake-prone countries, and the cleric's unusual explanation for why the earth shakes follows a prediction by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that a quake is certain to hit Tehran and that many of its 12 million inhabitants should relocate.
"Many women who do not dress modestly ... lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which (consequently) increases earthquakes," Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi was quoted as saying by Iranian media. Sedighi is Tehran's acting Friday prayer leader.
So now you know. Maybe that's where the expression 'the earth moved for me' came from. We live and learn.

Sunday, 18 April 2010


"The horror!, the horror!". I felt like emulating Conrad's Kurtz when I first read the shocking story.

SYDNEY — An Australian publisher is reprinting 7,000 cookbooks over a recipe for pasta with "salt and freshly ground black people."

Penguin Group Australia's head of publishing, Bob Sessions, acknowledged the proofreader for the Pasta Bible should have picked up the error, but called it nothing more than a "silly mistake" by confusing 'pepper' with 'people'.
Talking to The Sydney Morning Herald he sobbed."We're mortified that this has become an issue of any kind", adding "why anyone would be offended, we don't know."

Now Bob, you're Penguin's head of publishing, and you're that dumb?
They'll be 'offended' because there's lotsa money to be made in being offended. Bob, a whole industry has grown up around seeking out opportunities to be offended, and extracting large sums of spondoolucks from the offenders.
You know, it helps ease the pain.

Fascinating new academic research

The British regard people of mixed race as the most attractive and successful, say psychologists from Cardiff University. Celebrities such as formula one champion Lewis Hamilton, footballer Ryan Giggs and X Factor star Leona Lewis have helped boost the image of mixed race people The study used 40 female students to evaluate 1200 entries to Facebook – chosen completely at random, they insist.

But of course!
Naturally you’ll get some begrudgers. One said “Using high profile celebrities as "proof" of changing attitudes is spurious. There's no denying their looks and talent but they are celebrities precisely because they are talented and good-looking”
Another, of more philosophical bent claimed that “These ideas have been put into practise by lefties like MARX for years across Europe. With the sole intention to break down all forms of white European peoples and the eventual domination of communism.” While another claimed the whole thing was multi-culti PC “brainwashing”.

Many claimed that the candidate selection process was distorted so as to make mixed race and black candidates more attractive. Imagine such a thing! From academia!

All very confusing. So with a view to clarifying the matter I decided to hold our own contest on this blog, whose readers are without exception fair-minded and tolerant. I have chosen three candidates – completely at random, exactly like the academics at Cardiff Uni - and offer them to you now to vote on.

This vote must conform to the most rigorous research methodologies, so no double voting please!

Here are the three randomly chosen exemplars:

Candidate 1: White Race

Candidate 2: Mixed Race

Candidate 3: Black race

Will the results of this fascinating and eagerly-anticipated vote replicate those of Cardiff University? It’s up to you, dear readers.

Thursday, 15 April 2010

Rudd's "Abology"

You know of course that the Oz PM Kevin (“Cave-in”) Rudd took some time off from arranging mass immigration of non-whites to make a heartfelt apology to his ‘Aboriginal fellow countrymen’.
In a speech to Parliament he almost wept saying "for the indignity and degradation thus inflicted on a proud people and a proud culture, we say sorry." Mr Rudd said he apologised "especially" to the Stolen Generations of young Aboriginal children who were taken from their parents in a policy of assimilation which lasted from the 19th Century to the late 1960s.
According to the BBC “Mr Rudd received a standing ovation from MPs and onlookers in parliament, and cheers from the thousands of Australians watching outside.”

Now I've always been a bit confused by this because, as a dedicated cultural relativist, I always assumed that all cultures were equal. How then did the Stolen Generation suffer so much?

So I decided to spend some time researching the issue to determine just how much those kids suffered. After all, if the PM apologised in such profuse terms, they must have suffered a lot, right?

My main direct source was a book by Lloyd de Mause entitled The Origins of War in Child Abuse. This drew heavily on the work of leading anthropologists who studied the aboriginal culture and he quotes extensively from them.

I read early on that “the early infanticidal childrearing mode of Australian Aboriginals has been arguably the most abusive and neglectful of all tribal cultures”.

My goodness! Who could have imagined?

But surely it can’t be worse than what these innocents suffered under white adoption?

Well, I’ll let you be the judge.

According to the anthropologists who studied them (and who are highly complimentary to their, eh, culture) the Abos had some unusual proclivities. This from Roheim “the children who watched their mothers killing or eating babies suddenly avoided their parents, shrieked in their presence, or expressed unusual fear of them…recounting dreams about animal-man beings with the faces of parents smeared with blood. The fears and dreams get stored in their inner alters as time bombs to be exploded later in life."

Gee! I can't for the life of me imagine why.

Describing it as “a quite favourable picture”, Roheim tells us of “the custom of raping Aboriginal children, eating every second child and making the older children also eat them. Mothers regularly forced their children to eat their newborn siblings in the belief that the strength of the first child would be doubled by such a procedure. Sometimes the fetus would be pulled out by the head, roasted and eaten by the mother and the children and sometimes a big boy would be killed by the father by being beaten on the head and given to the mother to eat

Ok, so the unfortunate victims being reared by their white kidnappers missed out on some tasty baby food. But still, couldn't it have been somewhat upsetting for them to experience this, especially knowing that they themselves might be on tomorrow’s menu?

And not just tasty food. They also missed out on some kinky sex while in white captivity. Such as “the constant masturbation by mother of her children’s penis and vagina while she lies on top of them, twisting and pinching them as we saw was the practice in New Guinea.”

Apparently anthropologists report routine “incessant fondling of infants, masturbation by mothers kissing the boy’s penis, women passing baby boys back and forth over their heads, taking turns sucking the penis, lying on sons in the male position and freely masturbating them at night.”

But don't worry – these experts assure us that these practices are fine. In fact they’re “nurturant”.

And it wasn’t just the boys who missed out. “The mutilation of young girls’ vaginas is also practiced by the Aboriginals, in which old men roll emu feathers with a loop of hair. This device is put into the vagina and then removed, pulling away a large part of the womb. The rest of the womb is then cut horizontally and vertically with a stone knife. When this wound is healed, the girl is then circumcised and made to have intercourse with many young men. The mix of blood and semen is collected and given to frail tribesmen as a fortifying elixir.”

Just in case you think there’s anything wrong with this (have you not heard of cultural relativism, where all cultures are equal?) we have renowned experts like the (in)famous Kinsey and Pomeroy, and indeed the even more (in)famous Margaret Meade to reassure us that “incest between adults and younger children can be satisfying and enriching.”

Well, if they said it, that’s good enough for me. And just in case we get the wrong idea, we’re admonished in closing that “the origins of the very violent personalities of Aboriginals are, of course, in no way caused by genetic differences, only developmental.”

But of course!! My goodness, how could we even consider such a possibility?

Anyway, do you still think old Cave-in’s apology was justified?

See this also.

Tuesday, 13 April 2010

The solution to airport scanning

Here is the solution to all the controversy over full-body scanners at the airports. Have a booth that you can step into that will not X-ray you, but will detonate any explosive device you may have on you .

It would be a win-win for everyone, and there would be none of this crap about racial profiling, and this method would eliminate a long and expensive trial. Justice would be quick and swift.
Case Closed!
This is so simple that it is brilliant. I can see it now: you are in the airport terminal and you hear a muffled explosion.Shortly thereafter, an announcement comes over the PA system, "Attention standby passengers... we now have a seat available on flight number..."

Monday, 12 April 2010

For f*ck sakes!!!!

The latest incarnation of South Africa Sucks (MySAS) has been taken down by its administrator. He's fed up of the infighting and attacking of Jews. I agree with him on both counts but appeal to him to keep it open.

South Africa desperately needs all the forums it can get and this is tragic, especially given its high profile. As I said in a comment to the previous posts, if SA whites could fight against the ANC as they do against one another, the bastards would be out on their ears by now.

In any event knorrig tells me that there will be a new incarnation at MYSASers to

Wednesday, 7 April 2010

South Africa? Armageddon time?

At the time of the birth of the 'Rainbow Nation' in 1994 not even the most pessimistic observer would have predicted the speed and depth of the ensuing black leadership decline. After Mandela you had Mbeki, a major decline in itself, but at least he was literate and wore a suit. He in turn was replaced by the prolific Jacob Zuma, a barely literate tribesman who prances around in animal skins and fucks any woman he gets his paws on.
And Zuma looks like being replaced by?
Well, let’s see what the man himself says. He declares that “Julius Malema is a future president of our country”.
Julius who?
Zuma and I are talking here about the ANC Youth League President, who was, for good measure, described by Limpopo Premier Cassel Mathale as “an example for the nation.”
An example of what he didn’t specify, but we can guess.
What unique leadership characteristics does Julius bring to the table? Well, we know he eventually ‘graduated’ from secondary school at the ripe old age of 21, unable to construct a sentence in English, do simple arithmetic, or nail two pieces of wood together (his grade in Woodwork was 20%).
But hey! - such trivialities won't hold a good man back. And within a few short years (he’s now only 29) this horny-handed revolutionary son of the soil had amassed a personal property portfolio worth at least R5m and cars worth R1.2m. At a recent celebration his proletarian comrades drank gallons of Johnnie Walker Gold Label whisky, which costs around R700 a bottle, and Moet et Chandon French champagne, which costs multiples of that. He struts around wearing Gucci suits and a Breitling watch worth about R250 000 and travels in a car with no number plates with no fear of prosecution.

But what might appear as blatant hypocrisy and corruption to us is, apparently, a selfless exercise in black consciousness building. Over to Julius again "If we [he always refers to himself in the royal ‘We’] are going to refuse the youth to drive these cars it means they are only good for white youth. Ours will never drive those cars. So we must sit and appreciate the good things by whites and not by one of our own. That's what we're trying to break."
Oh, I see!
Black South African writer Jacob Dlamini says “Strip away that caricature, kill the cartoon, and what you are left with is a cunning thug who is the nexus of a patronage network based in Limpopo but that cuts across provincial borders.”
Even by African standards he’s way out in front when it comes to getting his snout in the trough. But that doesn’t seem to bother his impoverished followers. It seems an African trait to flaunt gaudy ostentation like he does, with the implicit promise that some of it will rub off on said followers. And this brings us a again to the cargo cult syndrome, whereby wealth is something that just happens - the only work required is to spread it out.

Therefore Malema’s gaudy parasitic lifestyle is what they’re invited to emulate. He’s saying to the youth (just like one of my favourites, the Cheef Ejukator) that you don't need an education, or need to work hard, or to be provident. No, just go into ‘politics’ and wait your turn for the goodies to be spread out to you.

Now there another side to him, that of an endlessly provocative buffoon, blowing away all accepted standards of civility. He enthusiastically recites the rollicking old ANC favourite “Kill the boer, kill the farmer” at every opportunity. A recent rendition of this ditty preceded the hacking to death of AWB leader Eugene Terreblanch a few days ago. He insults and threatens whites in a way that would have been inconceivable from any black politician even a few years ago, and he's attacked in the most egregious terms even ANC Government ministers. The non-black ones, that is.

More than one observer has likened him to a young Idi Amin.

Yet nobody in government has anything other than good things to say about him.

What’s going on here? In fact, what’s going on in South Africa generally?

I'm only an outside observer (albeit a regular visitor and one with many friends in that country) so my views have to be discounted to some extent. But sometimes an external observer identifies developments that may not be obvious to those on the ground, wrapped up as they are in the daily grind of surviving.

My view is that something major is going down and that it’s not going to be pretty. Why is Malema being tolerated, indeed encouraged, by powerful forces in that country? How does this fit in to other developments now underway?

Here are a few theories.

1. The ANC are using Malema as a holding operation

Under this scenario Malema is being tolerated because, whereas he’s pissing off the whites, they’re not going to react in any violent way and he is, maybe inadvertently on his part, keeping the increasingly restive native ‘youths’ pacified….. as they wait their turn at the trough when he gains power.

2. Malema plans to oust the ANC old guard

Under this scenario Malema is using his outlandish behaviour to divert attention from his real objective, viz, to bide his time until the country's ‘youths’ tire of the old guards’ failed promises and sweep Malema into power to deliver to them what he has, in splendid fashion, delivered to himself.

3. Extreme elements are setting Malema up for ‘martyrdom’

Here I see the possibility that extreme elements, e.g. SACP and the ANC youth wing, possibly a lot more, want the excuse to foment a full race war and get their hands on the loot, unencumbered by due process and such nonsense. If Malema were to be ‘assassinated’ and the killing blamed on ‘white extremists’, the pretext for all-out war of white genocide would be in place.

4. Malema’s being used to provoke a white reaction

In this scenario Malema becomes so provocative both verbally and physically (like with the murder of Terreblanch) that some whites will react by staging some form of armed resistance. This will be the excuse for black extremists to launch a genocidal attack on whites while maintaining the support of the rest of the world as they ‘put down the white reactionaries’ rebellion’.

5. He’s being used to unify white resistance

Ok, this is probably far-fetched, but I’ll give it to you anyway. My theory on this one is based on Malema’s clearly stated intention to have the country’s mines ‘returned’ to the blacks, without compensation. (“Here in Zimbabwe hear you are now going straight to the mines. That's what we are going to be doing in South Africa"). It’s a logical ‘progression’ of his ‘thinking’. Now this is the one thing calculated to put the wind up the ultimate power brokers in SA, the Oppenheimers and their like. Even without this latest development they must be worried about the way the country is going.

So, my (not very plausible) theory is, they see the need for whites to unify and defend ‘law and order’, now that the ANC seem incapable/unwilling to do this. Malema’s outrageous and threatening behaviour, singing ‘kill the boer’, and then having one of the boers’ leaders hacked to death would surely galvanise the, so far, supine whites. A unified, cohesive white force would easily overpower a numerically superior African opposition. At which point the mines would remain safely in the ownership of South Africa’s elite!

In any event, I think things are going to come to a head fairly soon. The catalyst could be the conclusion of the World Cup, the death of Mandela, or just a semi-spontaneous re-igniting of the ‘struggle’. Friends and colleagues there tell me that they’ve noticed a subtle change in attitude among their own black co-workers and other associates. There seems to be a pulling back and oblique references along the lines of ‘if something happens to whites it won't be my fault, even though you’ll have brought it on yourselves’.
They say it’s scary.
It is.

Saturday, 3 April 2010

A new talent for the Obama Administration

I thought the ‘Cheef Ejukator’ of Detroit couldn't be surpassed when it came to grotesque ignorance and stupidity until I saw this from Congressman Hank Johnson of Georgia. (check this link).
This guy his so dumb that he should be, well, maybe Education Secretary? He is a ‘person of colour’ after all, just like Obama's Surgeon General (see this)