Tuesday, 31 December 2013


Much comment on the previous post about the possibility of Vladimir Putin and  Russia as the last best hope for White Nationalists. Are those hopes realistic? I've put my thinking cap on and here's my position.
Ok, first the positives.  For a start I love the way he refuses to be intimidated by ‘public opinion’ or warnings from his putative moral superiors in the West. Without messing he’s awarded Pussy Riot and the Greenpeace people hefty jail sentences and he’s banned the proselytising of homosexuality and same-sex marriage, outraging Western degenerates such as the ubiquitous Stephen Fry (who, you’ll never guess, equated it to the Holocau$st ‘where most of my family were exterminated’).
He’s also restored much of the power and wealth of the Russian Orthodox Church (it’s only with difficulty I see this as a positive, and only on the basis of my enemy’s enemy being my friend.)  And there’s no doubt that he has made some powerful observations on the moral and demographic decline of the White race (The white race is dying out.  Do you understand what I am saying?”) and has acknowledged that this destruction has been driven from the top by ‘powerful forces’.  The clear inference being that such a thing won’t happen in Russia under his watch.
But will it?
There’s cause for great concern.  First it’s clear that his style is more USSR Release 2, or that of a Czar, rather than that of a Russian nationalist.  Accordingly he’s set great store by accepting, nay, welcoming, huge numbers of Asiatics and north Caucasians…..overwhelmingly Muslim.  On my last visit to Moscow I was staggered at the demographic change, from about 95% White ten years ago to about 70% now. There is no doubt that, despite his fine words, Putin has facilitated this, directly and indirectly, (e.g. employment and welfare bias) and almost exactly a year ago introduced an Amnesty for millions of such illegal immigrants.  Does not all of this sound eerily familiar?
As in the West, a heavy clampdown on nationalism is a corollary of mass immigration. And have no doubt, Putin has come down very hard on Russian nationalists. Despite perceptions to the contrary, Russia has its own panoply of ‘hate’ laws and has applied them almost exclusively against nationalists.  Just like in the West, attacks by enrichers get ignored, attacks by Russians on enrichers attracts the full force of the law and media. Putin’s antagonism to nationalists stems at least in part from the fact that they represent his strongest opposition by far.  The embodiment of that opposition, the Rodina (Homeland) party, has all but been destroyed.  But the persecution still goes on.
Worth noting here that (reflecting his nostalgia for the old USSR) Putin has established a youth organisation which is the old Komsomol in all but name. Any ambitious youth just has to join. And the new Konsomol is into multiculturalism in a way that would put an American university to shame. Every photo of the happy kids must feature a predefined (or so it seems) selection of black and brown faces (faeces?) and owners of said faces are promoted way out of line with their numbers and capabilities.
Bad as all of this undoubtedly is, it’s Putin’s relations with Jews that causes me the most concern. Now my main source of information here is my friend Oleg, whose view of Jews…….well, let’s just say that were our own esteemed Uncle Nasty to fall into his company he (UN) would soon be nervously edging towards the door.  (Here's my earlier post on Oleg).  Yet Oleg is not a liar and everything that I could check has stacked up.  Essentially “Putin is surrounded, supported, mentored and befriended by Jews and anti-Whites in his administration and, in fact, has been throughout his whole career.  Indeed he has.  Don’t be fooled by the Khodorovsky affair. Apparently Russia’s Jews had little time for him, and vice versa, and his jailing resulted from a power struggle with Putin, having nothing to do with his being an oligarch or Jewish. The oligarchs who have bent the knee to Putin have been allowed get away with their ill-gotten gains.
Wikileaks has provided extensive information on this subject (worth checking out for yourself).  We get the unexpurgated views of the stakeholders, and they are indeed revealing.  Here’s one example from the American Ambassador to Russia:  “Lazar [Berel Lazar, Chabad Lubavitch Shliach to Moscow and Chief Rabbi of Russia] called Putin the most pro-Jewish leader in Russian history, referring to his deep admiration for Israel and the Mossad, his trip to a kibbutz, and his cooperation with the Jewish community. Lazar noted the increase in Russian reverse immigration from Israel, estimating 100,000 Jews had returned in the past four years. He cited Putin's tolerance as a principal reason for the uptick”.
Oleg swears that Jews are at the levers of power in every state institution, and as elsewhere, work assiduously at recruiting and promoting their own. Anatoly Chubais, one of the architects of the looting of Russia under Yeltsin as well as a whole catalogue of other atrocious criminal actions, far from being jailed or, more justifiably executed, is, and has been for over a decade, one of Putin’s most powerful allies. He’s free to continue robbing the country blind, empowering his own Jewish mafia as he does so.  Oleg tells me that ordinary Russians are fully aware of this but feel powerless to do anything. As under the early USSR, there are severe penalties for ‘anti-Semitism’ which in practice means criticising anything or anyone that’s Jewish. By the way Oleg is emphatic that Putin’s mother was actually Jewish and it seems great efforts have been made to sanitise the official records, especially the spelling of her name. I’m unable to verify this, accounts are conflicting.
And we know, to our cost, what Jews do when they take over a country. No need to go over that again, isn’t that right, Mr. Shatter?  Now some people argue that Putin is merely working with Jews, that they don’t control him. Maybe, but if so, good luck to him with that. So going back to my original question, does Russia under Putin offer hope for Whites?  Based on the foregoing it would appear as if he’s as bad as any of the western traitors guilty of selling out their own countries.  But there is one strange and contradictory coda: Almost all the ‘bad guys’ in the west, the Neocons, the libtards, the BBC, the New York Times etc. they all hate him. What’s not to love….  inimicus inimici mei amicus meus est (my enemy’s enemy) and all that?
My view?  I think Putin sees himself as a modern Czar of the Russian Empire, a kind of a cross between Peter The Great and Stalin. He demonstrates strength, intelligence and persistence and could go on to be one of the most famous of Russian leaders. But a friend of White Nationalists?  I don’t think so.

Monday, 30 December 2013

Hey Bandar, get fitted for that bullet-proof vest!

The explosions in Russia in the lead-up to the Winter Olympics in Sochi bring to mind the famous/notorious meeting between Putin and Saudi Prince Bandar in Moscow last August. Bandar, among other things, is head of Saudi Intelligence.  He also (I know this from my many visits to that country) has a reputation for being totally corrupt, debased and degenerate, even by Saudi standards.

Anyway it seems that at that meeting Bandar made the Russians a generous offer in return for the Russians abandoning Bashar Assad.  "As an example, I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics in the city of Sochi on the Black Sea next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us."

It seems Putin was enraged by this and responded  “We know that you have supported the Chechen terrorist groups for a decade. And that support, which you have frankly talked about just now, is completely incompatible with the common objectives of fighting global terrorism that you mentioned.”

You don't have to have a suspicious mind to draw the conclusion that the current bombings are payback for that rejection. After all, as Bandar said,  "the Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us."

So here I have a bit of advice for Bandar, worthless degenerate monster as he may be.  Get fitted for a Kevlar bullet-proof vest. You're not dealing with Obama, Cameron, Hollande or any of the other spineless drones who head western governments.  You're dealing with one tough cookie, former head of the KGB, one who has utterly defeated you and your allies in the war that you started in Syria. He will not react well to having his country and its citizens blown up.

I await his reaction with eager anticipation.  I'd happily accept a trebling of the oil price if it resulted from Bandar and his sick, vile kingdom being blown to, well, kingdom come.

Saturday, 28 December 2013

The nativists grow restless

As every schoolboy knows, Duck Dynasty reality star Phil Robertson was suspended from the super-popular show for (roll of drums)  HATE.  Specifically for saying - sorry, spewing, it's always spewing when it comes to HATE -  “It seems like, to me, a vagina — as a man — would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me."

What could be more hateful than that? 

And the good people at the A&E network immediately responded - following squeals of outrage from the gay 'community' -  by suspending Phil from the show. The suspension was greeted with predictable approval by the 'liberal' MSM.  To digress for a moment, it's perfectly clear that A&E, from the depths of their hermetically sealed Hollywierd cocoon, originally envisaged that the show would be for laughs, as their sophisticated viewers cracked up at the antics of the rednecks out in a Louisiana swamp.  But again, as every schoolboy knows, the show was a hit for precisely the opposite reason as the views and lifestyle of the down-to-earth family resonated to an extraordinary degree with the viewers.

Cue an explosion of outrage from said viewers when the suspension was announced,  followed by demonstrations and boycotts.  Immediately sensing the potential impact on the bottom line (as it were) the freaks at A&E ingloriously caved in and reinstated Phil.  This my friends is another sign that the nativists grow restless. Hopefully demonstrations and boycotts will soon be replaced by flaming torches and tumbrels.


Duck Quackers:  1

Fudge Packers:  0

PS: Off topic, but there's some very good stuff on bitcoin on the comment thread to this post.

Tuesday, 24 December 2013

Happy Christmas Everyone!

And note that I did not wish a Happy Xmas, or Happy Holiday, or Kwazoo or whatever else they use in the war against Christmas.
And may all your Christmases be WHITE! 

Tiger gets his Christmas Wish

Sunday, 22 December 2013

How to handle Deluded White 'Liberal' Females (and males)

This post is a follow-on to the previous one in that it was the same social occasion and the same people. As I've said before (and I accept that some of us are more vulnerable to 'liberal' (ha!) retaliation than are others) the best approach for a WN is to be unapologetic for what we say.  Works for me and this instance underlines its effectiveness.

DWLF in accusatory tone: 'So you're saying that blacks are inferior to Whites?'

Me: 'Are you serious?  Is this a serious question?'

DWLF falteringly: 'Well, yes'

Me: 'So let me understand this. You're asking whether the race that invented just about everything the world uses today is not superior to one that, right up to the present day, has no written language, no system of even the most basic mathematics, whose societies are  - without exception - poverty-stricken, barbaric and primitive? They never built anything more than a single story grass hut and never discovered the wheel.'

Listen, not only are they inferior to Whites, they're inferior to BEAVERS, who build much better and more complex homes. Why they're even inferior to the fucking DUNG BEETLE which at least discovered a rudimentary wheel structure to roll away the balls of shit.  Jesus, and you ask me if WHITES are superior?  Are you for real?'

 Beaver lodge architecture
Dung beetle 'wheel'

Now this was greeted with squeals of outrage-cum-laughter.  But note, mainly laughter.  I jokingly pretended to look into the ear of the DWLF purporting to check for a brain.  The interesting thing is that even she was laughing and her outrage was really de rigueur rather than heartfelt.

I felt safe in letting the subject change so as not to make it appear I was proselytising.  But for sure the seeds were planted, and more to the point a very touchy subject had been broached and handled without any comeback. I do recognise that every situation is different.  But I believe, more strongly than ever, that equivocating and apologetically trying to get your point across does not work and serves merely to whet the inherently bullying proclivities of today's, excuse me, 'liberals'.

On the same subject you might be interested in this.

Thursday, 19 December 2013

"You're a Holocaust denier!"

Such was the charge levelled against me in a conversation with friends and acquaintances last Tuesday evening.  Am I?  Well, you be the judge as I lay out my position.

1. The Jews in Europe did indeed suffer a Holocaust in which vast numbers of them were killed and otherwise lost their lives during WW II.

2.  The numbers come nowhere near the mythical (and it is mythical) figure of six million. I don't know what the number was, maybe nobody does but I suspect it was closer to a tenth of that figure.

3. Other peoples suffered a Holocaust as well during this time, at least as bad as that suffered by the Jews. I have in mind the Poles, Russians, Ukrainians and of course the Germans themselves. The ratio of Tutsis slaughtered in Rwanda dwarfs the ratio of Jews killed in their Holocaust. Yet Jews have cornered the genocide market.

4. There was no plan to exterminate Europe's Jews.  The plan was to get them into work camps, slave labour camps if you will, and at the end of the war expel them to Israel, Uganda, Madagascar or the steppes of Russia.

5. The majority of Jewish deaths resulted from the actions of the Einsatzgruppen and their local allies.  These forces operated behind German lines after Operation Barbarossa to suppress local resistance.  Such resistance was strongly associated with Jews who were in any event an easily identifiable target. Vast numbers were murdered and buried in mass graves. The local forces allied to the Einsatzgruppen undoubtedly took the opportunity to settle many an old score as part of the process. Typhus outbreaks in the camps were also a major contributor...possibly the largest.

6. The idea of the gas chambers as a form of mass slaughter is a complete fabrication.

7. The piles of skeletal bodies as seen in the iconic photos from Belsen and elsewhere represented the victims of typhus and starvation, the latter brought on by the bombing of German supply lines.

I have not arrived at these conclusions casually or quickly. I truly believe that they represent what really occurred.

Tuesday, 17 December 2013

Sunday, 15 December 2013

The real nutcases

If you're like me you got a right belly laugh at the antics of the by now famous Thamsanqa Jantjie, the guy who flailed his arms about during the obsequies for St. Mandela, pretending to translate into deaf-speak. A confession: I find it hard to keep a straight face looking at legitimate deaf interpreters so you can understand how this guy totally cracked me up.  I must have looked at  the clip about fifty times.  And of course it's perfectly obvious how he got the gig...via BEE, black economic empowerment which means that no matter what the required qualifications, a black must get the job.  Provided he greases a few greasy palms beforehand. So as well as providing the amusement, the episode illustrated to the world once again blacks' total ineptitude at everything and also served as a reminder of the fate that awaits the once First World South Africa.

However I'm posting here on a different aspect, namely the staggering security breach the incident represented.  Bad enough were the guy to be just another African crook trying get his paws on a few shillings.  But it's since emerged that he suffers from 'schizophrenia and hallucinations and saw angels while gesturing incoherently just 3 feet away from President Barack Obama and other world leaders'.  Adding grist to the mill it appears he has been accused of rape, murder and assault, charges which seem to have been dismissed due to his being a nutcase.

Yet as the report says and photographs confirm, he was within three feet of Obama and other world leaders. Which brings me to the all-pervading American 'security' apparatus, the one revealed in all its horrifying glory by Edward Snowden.  You know the one that bugs everybody's phone, that analyses every email, text message and Internet post irrespective of time, location or target (and then sends the analysis on to Israel)? The one that steamrolls over fundamental rights enshrined in the US Constitution and whose managers perjure themselves - without sanction - as they testify before Congress?

Yes, that's the security apparatus I'm talking about.

And it's been justified in the name of 'keeping America safe'.  Yet it failed to prevent an hallucinating schizophrenic, one accused of rape and murder, getting with three feet of their President. And as every schoolboy knows, schizophrenics hear voices instructing them to do things. He could easily got a message along the lines of 'that guy on your right was behind the Affordable Care Act website.  Kill!  Kill!'  

The security failure is gross enough to beggar belief.  But not if you consider an alternative focus for the apparatus, namely American citizens. And this seems by far the likeliest explanation.  Remember this apparatus has failed in virtually everything significant on an international scale, failing to predict national uprisings throughout the globe as well as the fall of Communism.  Their only success really lay, in conjunction with Mossad, in pulling off the 911 false flag.

Yet they continue to get away with it, gaining greater influence and power every year. So who are the real nutcases here......the American people or Thamsanqa Jantjie?

Wednesday, 11 December 2013

A great opportunity for the equality agenda

Remember before Janet Yellen got the Fed job it was supposed to be a contest between her and Larry ('Larry the Looter') Summers?     Remember when 'battle lines have been drawn over gender'.  You see, one was a man, the other a man a woman. Kind of.  And it was deemed 'a battle of the sexes'.  Yellen's eventual appointment was deemed a vindication of diversity, equality and all that good stuff. 

But now it seems we could be faced with another gender battle regarding her deputy.  Former Hawkish Bank Of Israel Head Rumored To Be Next Fed Vice Chairman says Zero Hedge, which has a very reliable record on such reporting. And that former head is another man.

Now I have a crazy idea.  How about an  insensitive battle about religion/race as well as gender?   How about some quotas here?  You know, the kind of thing that says you must have a proportionate number of blacks and whites in the Fire Department, even if the blacks fail all the tests and their  reading skills render them unable to distinguish between petrol and water?  Remember, we are solemnly and endlessly reminded that employment must reflect America's rich mosaic of races.

Always eager to help, I've done some herculean mathematical calculations here and have arrived at the conclusion that, were we to apply the same principles to Fed and Supreme Court appointments the number of Jews would be, well, zero actually.  Yet there are four Jews on the SCOTUS and as for the Fed bosses..........

So how about it guys? 

Sweden: The end

Can a society ever recover from such depravity?

'A paedophile who sexually abused five-year-old girl is given permission to adopt a child in Sweden. A social affairs committee deemed him at low risk of reoffending.'   Oh well, that's ok then.
He's been found guilty of 90 crimes including molesting a young girl from his neighbourhood in 2004 and  was suspected of raping a young teenage girl.  Despite not being charged for rape, social services ruled that the man needed to be supervised around his own children. he was considered at high risk of sex offending again, with his ‘probable victims’ were underage girls. Treatment was again recommended as well as parenting classes.

And he's allowed adopt a child.

This is of course part of  the overall programme of societal destruction being visited on us and we're all in the cross-hairs.  Check out this if your stomach can take it.

Saturday, 7 December 2013

Explaining the hysteria

I know that Mandela is a special hate figure for many if not most on this blog, especially South Africans.  But I don't see it that way.  You see he fought diligently, relentlessly and highly successfully for his own people.  That was very bad for Whites there and it gets worse by the day.  Yet if Whites had had a Mandela on their side who knows how things might stand today? And sure he was involved in violence where innocent people got killed, but that happens in every rebellion or civil war.  (Why, we  have another black man in the White House who does it daily on a much bigger scale and he has the Nobel Peace Prize on his cupboard.) Mandela was also a man of principle,  enduring many additional years in prison for refusing to renounce his policies.  And finally, in a way unknown in the rest of Africa, he did seek to embrace the country's Whites, albeit being too old ultimately to make much difference.

Having said all of that he was, or should be, a minor world figure. Yes, he 'inspired' his movement from prison, was ultimately successful and held the position of President for a few years. In terms of global importance his country would realistically be ranked mid-range, about the same as say Algeria or Roumania.  Now can you imagine the global reaction to the death of one of their Presidents? A few lines on the back page.   Or let's take Presidents with colossal geopolitical achievements, such as Michael Gorbachev, who oversaw the collapse of the Second World, or Helmut Kohl who rammed through German reunification.  Compare those achievements to that of Mandela who, in effect, lead the majority in a sometimes violent rebellion against a tiny and ultimately doomed minority in a country of little global importance.

Realistically he didn't achieve a lot more than did ben Bella in Algeria or even Mugabe in Southern Rhodesia . But you'd never think that from the MSM in the west.  I don't need to rub your noses in it anymore. But to take just a single example, the front page of the Irish Times yesterday had the paper's logo at the top, while every other single pixel went to make up a giant picture of Mandela (whom many of the cringing and slobbering madia have now taken to calling -excruciatingly -  Madeba.)  Suffice to say I have never - ever -  seen such blanket hagiographical coverage, not even for JFK.

All for the leader of a rebellion in a faraway country of modest importance.

The whole treatment bears an uncanny resonance with that of the Peace Prize Laureate himself, you know the one who starts undeclared wars and makes a list of people to be killed at the beginning of each week.  I remember when he burst on the scene on the basis of his speech to the Democratic National Convention. Now I'm not looking at this with hindsight but I really did think at the time 'ok the guy made a good speech. So what?'  I say the same about any speech from any politician. Because they have highly paid speech writers to create the words while the pol just reads them out. The words are analysed and parsed and run across focus groups interminably before they're finally loaded up onto the speaker's autocue. The 'soaring rhetoric' is someone else's creation

So really we're just seeing another example of the attempt to transmogrify elemental and localised black accomplishments into something profound and global.  And that in turn is part of the broader strategy to make blacks appear good, successful, intelligent and thus attractive brood stock for na├»ve and credulous White females. Probably 95% of those creaming themselves over 'Madeba' don't realise why they're doing it. But the elite few currently implementing the long-standing programme of White destruction know exactly what's going on. And why. As the following quotation from Mein Kampf underlines, the author was ahead of his time in so very many ways.

“The Jews were responsible for bringing negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate.”

Couldn't put it better myself.

Thursday, 5 December 2013

Was Quisling a quisling?

Very few people can be said to have had their name become a word in its own right in the English language. Captain Jimmy Boycott, of Co. Mayo, would undoubtedly agree were he still with us.  Vidkun Quisling has also lent his name to the language albeit in an altogether less flattering way. Quisling has come to refer to the lowest form of traitor, the kind who supports the enemy against his own country.

So what did the eponymous Quisling do to merit such a reputation?

Vidkun Quisling was a Norwegian politician (he served as Norwegian Minister of Defence) and quasi philosopher. His family were it seems warm and friendly and stayed close right  up until his death. He was a brilliant student at all levels. In the 1920's he undertook humanitarian work in the USSR to help ameliorate the effects of the notorious famines there and also worked on behalf of the Armenians. By all accounts he was a superb administrator and proved highly effective in offsetting what he came to see as the catastrophic effects of Bolshevism. He also provided diplomatic (and some say spying) services for Britain during this time.  His humanitarian work lead to his later being awarded the Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) by the King of England and similar recognition from the governments of Roumania and Yugoslavia.

Later after serving in a number of Governments his party seized power with the aid of Germany in the turmoil that ensued after WW II broke out.  While leader he worked diligently to broker peace between Germany and the Allies.  Later in the war he broke into tears when it became apparent that Germany had no plans to reinstate Norwegian independence. Towards the end of the war he did everything in his power to minimise Norwegian casualties, refused to sign any execution orders, risking his own life in the process. Once German defeat became inevitable he ordered forces under his command not to offer resistance to either the Allies or the internal resistance movement.

I've read a lot about his trial and, absolutely sincerely, believe it to have been an outrageous miscarriage of justice, featuring one trumped-up charge after another.  For example his death sentence was contrived under a law that was enacted half way through the war by the government-in-exile . (On the other hand one Maynard Cohen declared the trial to be a model of probity). All witnesses to his execution concede that he died bravely and fearlessly. His last words were, "I'm convicted unfairly and I die innocent. Within ten years I will be seen as another King Olaf'  (a legendary 11th Century Norwegian patriot)..

Sorry Vidkund, but The Narrative had been well established within that time and you were the designated  'bad guy'. 

So what exactly had he done to merit the ultimate fate, and his name becoming synonymous with treason?  Siding with the enemy?  Well, maybe. But you see Britain had violated Norwegian territory before Germany did. They knew that Germany desperately needed Swedish iron ore and were therefore equally desperate to stop its shipment. Towards this end they mined Norwegian territorial waters - an act of war against Norway - and had drawn up detailed plans for the invasion and occupation of that country.  Towards this end they had planned a false flag operation as a pretext to invade and  'protect' (on behalf of the Scandinavians of course!) the mines and shipping routes from  the Germans.  The Altmark Incident confirmed to Hitler that a British invasion of some kind was imminent and this is what lead to the German action. The Germans just beat the Allies to the punch.

Norway would be invaded by one side or the other no matter what the Norwegians wanted or did.

Had the British had got there first they would for certain have done exactly what the Germans did....i.e. install a puppet government to help them achieve their war objectives. What would have happened to their Quisling - the Good Quisling -  at war's end?  Well, we all know the answer to that, don't we children?  Compare and contrast Quisling with King Victor Emmanuel of Italy. This guy had worked with Mussolini and had earlier instigated invasions of numerous countries, which ultimately lead to tens of thousand of deaths. But - in the finest Italian tradition - yon king had the good sense to change sides when the WW II tide was turning. He ended his life in peace and luxury as did countless other mass murdering villains from that war.

As Talleyrand so well stated, treason is only a matter of timing. A couple of centuries earlier Sir John Harrington put the same concept to verse.

"Treason doth never prosper; what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

Note: Most of my material came from Hans Fredrik Dahl's Quisling: A Study in Treachery, which, as the title makes abundantly clear, was not sympathetic to its subject.  Other sources were also used.

Monday, 2 December 2013

Nastiest Uncle: The final countdown

The issue of Nastiest Uncle has been dominating the airwaves again. And therein lies a problem. The debate about allowing him comment has been long-standing and I've covered the pros and cons more comprehensively here.   In general I believe that contrarian views should be allowed. After all, my awakening on the Jewish Issue came via the then contrarian views expressed by, inter alia, Uncle Nasty and kulak.

But I think the situation has changed for the following reasons. First NU posts too often. This was revealed in the comments analysis undertaken by katana which frankly astounded me. Second he invariably introduces a topic not related to the post in question......the thread then degenerating into an unstructured and unproductive melee of name-calling. These two factors mean that in essence he is, as claimed by multiple readers, derailing the purpose of the blog. And the only reason I do this blog is to try and awaken and explain to Whites to the plan for our ethnic destruction. If that's being undermined I need to respond.

Accordingly and reluctantly I'm imposing moderation sanctions on NU. I'm not reverting to the pre-approval form of moderation, rather consigning his comments, if they continue to appear, to the grim solitude of the ether.

Saturday, 30 November 2013

Ethics for thee but not for me

The heading and sub-heading from The Jewish Forward say it all.
'Jews Unite Behind Push for Immigration Reform*: Ethics and Self-Interest Drive Unusual Nationwide Effort'

Well whatever about ethics, self-interest certainly. Because - provided they manage to get away with it - a mongrelised dumbed-down America will surely strengthen the relative position of Jews. Those pesky Whites who created the greatest civilisations the world has ever seen will have become deracinated and marginalised. No longer real competitors. This of course begs the question as to whether the resultant society, which will inevitably resemble the likes of Brazil or Mexico today, will make the effort ultimately worthwhile. For sure their dusky citizens won't be as accommodating towards Jews as Americans have been.

Meanwhile half way across the globe lies a country closer than the USA to the hearts of those same 'united Jews'. Here they have a dramatically different approach to 'immigration reform'. Israel, according to the Interior Minister 'belongs to the white man'.  The horror! The horror! In fact  it's a land reserved for an even more specific race.   They're now bringing in DNA testing to ensure the Jewish racial purity of would-be Russian immigrants. Having already herded their black Untermenchen into concentration camps before turfing them back to the Dark Continent.

Yet those 'united Jews'  seem to have no problem 'ethically' supporting immigration to the US while supporting Israel as it does the polar opposite.  The hypocrisy and chutzpah take the breath away. Which brings me back to the question above:  Will they get away with it? It seems incredible that they could - that anyone, in fact, could pull off such a blatant scam.  But they seem, as of now, to be doing just that.

*Immigration 'reform' = mass Turd World immigration to White lands and only White lands.

Friday, 29 November 2013

Oh happy day....

Following on from my previous post, this headline says it all.

CNN and MSNBC Lose Almost Half Their Viewers in One Year

Thank you God.  Yes folks, things are changing. And fast. A decline on this scale suggests something dramatic is afoot. And surely, as the transformation in reader comments underlines, it reflects the dawning on the general public that the corporate media is nothing other than a propaganda vehicle. One that's inimical to their interests.

A major transformation is indeed underway. But, as I asked in my previous post, will it be enough? And is it too late?

Monday, 25 November 2013

The MSM fights back against its readers

Back to a favourite subject of mine -   the disparity between 'journalism' and reader comments. The two worlds are here.  Now a  new book testifies to the effectiveness of on-line comments. As the title underlines, The “Nasty Effect:” Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies defines 'nasty' as in effect any non-PC comment.  Good.  It bemoans the dramatic change as readers unload on previously protected people and subjects in a manner previously unimaginable. It seeks 'solutions' but offers very little, recognising that having gained the taste for free speech, readers will simply move to other forums were it to be removed.

Not that the MSM isn't trying.  More and more outlets are refusing to offer a comment facility and it remains to be seen how this pans out.  One of these by the way is Popular Science which has thrown its hands up at those pesky people questioning orthodox - this is the word they use - .'doctrine'. Presumably they don't see that science and doctrine are mutually exclusive.  But hey, there are valuable global warming shekels at stake here, so to hell with the purity of scientific enquiry.

Some outlets turn off the comment facility when the subject is likely to elicit a storm of angry non-sanctified reaction. However this has been noticed by readers everywhere, further shredding what remains of MSM credibility. Some conventional sites render themselves even more ridiculous by crudely deleting specific unhallowed views, in many cases rendering the whole thread incomprehensible. However, one of the most effective is that deployed by the once great now reprehensible BBC.  'Selected Reader Comments'.  Have you noticed that?  Nice one, in that it presents the impression of being a representative sample while, needless to say, hewing rigidly to the prescribed doctrine.

The most important comment development of all however lies within the comments themselves. These have shown a stunning rate of awakening over the last few years. Even with moderators beavering away readers are unloading on political correctness, mass immigration, race, and the Jewish role in all of these.

It's very positive.  But is it too little and/or too late?

Friday, 22 November 2013

Don't know whether to laugh or cry...........

Sheffield City Council obviously has high hopes for its new Roma enrichers.

'Don't defecate or urinate on the street'
'Don't have sex on the street'
'Don't dump your rubbish in your neighbour's yard'
'Don't try to sell your babies'
'Don't shoplift'
'Don't rip out and sell the plumbing and other utilities from your taxpayer-provided housing'

Maybe the pictures shown here of a Roma settlement in Slovakia prompted the Council to issue these thoughtful suggestions.  If you think they're of Pakistan or India then it's because that's where these parasitic scumbags originated. And now they'll be swarming over the UK and Ireland in even greater numbers from next January as the already pathetic immigration controls are abandoned entirely.

We really have arrived at the apex of insanity where literally the lunatics run the asylum.

Want another example?

'We want to claim our streets back. Tensions are building here. We need to do something or it will be too late’. 

What's mad about that?  Well, the fact that it was uttered by one Kashmir Malik of Sheffield's Pakistani 'community'.  Yes, according to the Daily Mail 'the local Pakistani community association is running ‘official’ warden patrols between 8pm and 10pm every weekday with the intention of ‘educating’ the Roma population about ‘how to behave in England’.

'Our' streets............'how to behave in England'.

One's head spins. We descend deeper into the raging cauldron of insanity, of mass delusion as a nation self-destructs before our very eyes. We are the rats in the maze of this deranged experiment.  Sheffield in this instance is the petri dish. But listen. There's method to the madness.  It's an old totalitarian technique. Blatant and relentless cognitive dissonance, the absorption of one insane phenomenon after another, all serve to undermine the victim's (that's us) self-confidence, pride, dignity and by extension our capacity to resist. This tactic has been well established.

And what about this....... David Blunkett, a key member of the government that did more than any other to flood the country with the kind of people who build the kind of countries those same people are desperate to escape from........this guy warns that the area 'could explode into the ugly street warfare that broke out more than two decades ago'.  Words fail me.  Personally I'd take childcare advice from Casey Anthony before I'd take social advice from this decrepit horny old hypocrite.

Remember this, just in case the opportunity ever arises to roll out the tumbrels and bring these traitorous scum to justice.  They have waged an unrelenting war against the family, against the community, against tradition, against history, against wisdom and experience, against individuality, against ethics, against common sense, against classical aesthetics, against reason and statesmanship.

Against reality and human nature itself.

In Sheffield we can see at first hand the results of their evil machinations.  How cannot the great mass of people not see how they've had their country taken from them?  Is there any hope?

Monday, 11 November 2013

Denmark again 'happiest nation'. But for how long?

Denmark has repeatedly featured among the happiest, if not the happiest, nations in the world. They come out on top again in the latest survey. Take a look to what the ultra-PC France24 ascribes this achievement - this ascription being fully consistent with academic research in the field..

First is financial and physical security.  Comprehensive welfare state including subsidised childcare and unemployment insurance that guarantees 80-percent wages for two years if they lose their jobs together with a low crime rate, especially that of violent crime.

The second pillar of happiness is a 'high level of trust between people. This could be a spill-over effect from people's high level of trust in the government, which is underpinned by a low level of corruption'

Social cohesion is the third factor and in reality underpins  all of the others.

Denmark's unique history is adduced.as the final factor.

Now you'd imagine that with such a stunning rate of societal success the Danes would be loathe to tamper in any way with the formula.  But not only are they tampering with it they are undermining it at its most fundamental level.  This by way accepting massive numbers of immigrants from countries and cultures that are the total opposite of the Danes', that is, the saddest countries in the world.  Shoot to the bottom of the list and you'll see, quelle surprise, that it's comprised almost totally of African and/or Muslim countries.

Reflect on the factors that account for Denmark's success and then look at the sad countries. They are, unsurprisingly, the polar opposite. Does this not underline the evil and madness of the  multi-cultural experiment?  Healthy societies deliberately infected with a fatal bacillus.  The punishment for the perpetrators cannot be too severe as this, being virtually irremediable,  is literally the worst form of treason.

Thankfully, alone of the Nordic countries, Denmark has - belatedly - taken steps to ameliorate their society's destruction so there's some hope. Sweden?   Irrecoverable, in my view.

Friday, 8 November 2013

Shatter and Lentin's handiwork

Taking up from the previous post we learn from the first Interim Report of the Child Care Law Reporting Project that African families in Ireland are '20 times more likely' to end up in child care courts. Apparently 'Neglect is the number one reason for children to be taken into care, commonly because a parent is suffering from a mental illness'.

Isn't that wonderful?  Say a nice big thank you to Mr. Shatter and Ms. (or is it also Mr.?) Lentin.

Displaying the customary stunning naivety of the people who draw up such documents the authors paint a picture of a "cohort of children who need protection and nurture if they are to grow and develop and who are not getting this from their parents for various reasons"  So are we to assume then that if they get the requisite protection and nurture the little black ones, when they grow up, will become model and productive citizens?

Like they do everywhere else.  So that's all right then.

The one silver lining was the reader reaction as embodied in the comments. Even on the 'liberal' Journal.ie they were heavily negative. For example this was approved by a 22:1 ratio: 'I have been to Africa and I seen who  [sic] in African culture it is normal for a man to beat his wife and children when he gets pissed off. There was one time a man had his wife on the ground kicking her on a busy street and nobody even looked.  It’s a culture thing.'  Several readers also pointedly mentioned that the Irish taxpayer would be picking up the tab for this societal disaster inflicted on us by YKW.

PS: Lo and behold, when I went to check just now on the Indo comments I found they had disappeared - or rather been disappeared - since the report was published.   Same thing happening everywhere folks, but I think and believe that this is actually a good thing and that the moderators are ultimately fighting a losing battle.

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

Another treacherous interloper

A reader sent me this link which nearly made me throw up my rasher sandwich in rage. It features one Ronit Lentin who heads up the Race, Ethnicity and Conflict Studies department at Trinity College Dublin.  What's she doing here in Ireland?  After all she was born in Israel to Jewish immigrants from Roumania. Well what she's doing here is the same thing her co-ethnic Alan Shatter is doing. Race replacing the Irish people.  Yes, an Israeli Jew of Romanian parentage is directing our destruction......and berating us for our racism while doing it!


She talks about Irelands’ 'long and shameful history in its treatment of migrants since the state's inception'.  Yeah, right.  What she does not talk much about is how her actual homeland - Israel - handles its own racial problems. As in rounding up its Africans and stuffing them into concentration camps before booting them back to Africa. (Which I strongly approve of, by the way). When challenged in another forum she did grudgingly concede that 'Israel was a racial regime but was not based upon colour nor ethnicity.'

Thanks, so that's cleared that up then.

And can I now put to rest a particular canard that's a staple of the anti-racist fever swamps which this lizard frequently brings up to silence Irish race realists: Namely that for many years in America the Irish were deemed to be non-White.  True as far as it goes, but that's not  very far at all. Because the whole issue of classifying people as White at that time had to do with power, voting rights, religion etc. and not with colour or ethnicity. Which explains why Germans, Finns and some  other northern Europeans were also classified as non-White for some time.  Anyone making even a cursory analysis of the subject would readily realise this.  But of course the anti-racist industry has other objectives in mind, namely to keep programming Whites with the meme that race is a social construct.

Like Shatter and other Jewish luminaries in Ireland, Ronit Lentin never misses an opportunity to berate the Irish on the tiny number of Jewish refugees we accepted in the early twentieth century. 

Lady, what ever the number was it was too big.

Saturday, 2 November 2013

Learning from Obituaries....

It seems that every couple of days New Orleans loses one of its treasured
Let’s get the players straight before we go on with this..


His Companion : Kawanner Armstrong

His Sons : Christian Allen
Kwan Allen
Larmondo Allen, Jr.

His Daughters : Deidra Allen
Larmenshell Allen
Lamonshea Allen
Larmomdriel Allen
Larmerja Allen
Korevell Allen

AT AGE 25 - He had 9 Children.

His Father: Burnell Thompson
His Mother: Esther Allen
His Stepfather: Bruce Gordy

His Brothers: Burnell Thompson
Edgar Thompson
Wil Willis
Danta Edwards
Reshe Edwards
Mattnell Allen
Burnell Allen
Lester Allen

His Sisters: Shannail Craig
Lekiksha Thompson
Gwendolyn Carter
Jessica Willis
Katina Gordy

Grandparents: Delors Allen
J.C. Allen
Anna Laura Thompson
Will Thompson




He was 25 and had 3 sons and 6 daughters.
welfare recipients collecting $950 each ....
That equals $8,550a month !!! Now add

Food Stamps ,
Free medical, Free school lunches,

And on and on
Do the math... $102,000+ /year .
Anyone out there, sittin' on their butt while reading this, making A HUNDRED GRAND doing nothing?

Now that, to me, is a real Entrepreneur.

Internalise or rebel?

Which of two outcomes follows from repeated exposure to insane  '1984' style cognitive dissonance? Do the general public internalise the new normal, i.e. the insanity, or at some point does recognition dawn, to be followed by outraged rebellion?  The answer will determine whether the West and the White race can be saved.

Here's a trivial yet exemplary case in point. First, a bit of context. The European Champions League is really big business. Massive amounts of money involved.  The results also mean an awful lot to an awful lot of people. (Full disclosure: I'm biting my nails for the duration of each Celtic match). Should a referee or player be found to have corruptly influenced a result the punishment would be severe.  And as any fan knows, playing before your home crowd offers a huge advantage.......typically a defeat away is reversed by a victory at home.

Now to my example. In a game between Manchester City and CSKA in Moscow Yahya Toure claimed some of the home fans made monkey noises towards him. Net result a whole section of the ground has been closed off for future CL matches, and if the offence is 'repeated' future games would be played in an empty stadium.  As happened recently in Hungary.  This would probably mean the difference between CSKA progressing and going out of the competition.

Now get this. Nobody - nobody - apart from Toure 'heard' the monkey chants. Not the referee, the linesmen, the fourth official, the team manager, Toure's team-mates (including the other black players). Everyone denied that there were chants. In fact CSKA themselves have black players who said that they heard nothing and had never had any racial problems at all.  So all of the severe problems for CSKA derived from an accusation by a single player, an accusation totally uncorroborated by anyone else.

By any objective yardstick this is total and utter insanity, inmates running the asylum stuff.

Those of us on this blog know of course the agenda behind things like this.  But what about the proverbial man in the street? Will he just internalise this as the new normal.......or will he stop and ask what the hell is going on here?  It's a vital question.  Because an awakening could open up the whole Pandora's box in my view.   I personally see evidence of a reaction, but that might just be wishful thinking on my part.

Thursday, 31 October 2013

Just a thought...........

The flooding of Ireland with African cultural enrichers has, if nothing else, provided me with an opportunity to study them in the raw, so to speak.  Yes, I've worked in Africa but that was usually by way of shortish (a couple of weeks) assignments, most of which were taken up with a hotel-to-meeting-back-to-hotel work day.

In Ireland I have noticed, or at least I think I've noticed, two things. First, black males invariably have a mobile phone stuck to their ear while walking.  Whether they're actually talking or just doing it for effect I don't know.  The other thing is that they continually check around and behind them in a way Whites never do. Maybe I'm imagining this but I don't think so.

Imagine my surprise then a few nights ago when my impressions received startling confirmation.  Well, kind of. You see I was half tuned in to a nature programme that Lady Savant was watching when, lo and behold, it showed apes doing the same thing.  According to the narrator, this was a defence mechanism to check for potential predators sneaking up on them.

Is there a connection?  I do not know.  But I think we should be told.

Tuesday, 29 October 2013

Tragedy at American Renaissance narrowly averted

It all began with a wailing of ambulance sirens, followed by a squealing of brakes as the vehicle shuddered to a halt in a cloud of dust outside the hospital. The crew whipped open the rear doors and wheeled out a ghostly apparition, more dead than alive. Ghastly pale, wheezing through his oxygen mask, an intravenous drip attached to his arm, it appeared to onlookers that the poor guy was not long for this world.

Happily, thanks to the frantic work of the emergency medical staff his life was saved and he's now out of danger.  Enquiries revealed that his near demise arose from labour exhaustion. 'He worked as a comment moderator at the Amren web site' a hospital spokesman spokesperson tersely announced. Further enquiries revealed that the unfortunate victim, who had been moderating this article on the site, was overcome by an avalanche of unsanctified reader comments, too great for him to handle.

Working feverishly he deleted comment after comment, but, like the hydra monster, the more he deleted the more seemed to come in. Whack-a-mole ad infinitum. Eventually fellow workers heard a strangled cry and saw him collapse to the office floor, sweating profusely, his breath coming in short strangled gasps. Quickly recognising the criticality of his condition they called emergency services. And the rest you know about.

As Obummer would say, he is in our prayers. 

Sunday, 27 October 2013

My daughter

My daughter just walked into the living room and said "Dad, cancel my allowance immediately, rent my room out, throw all my clothes out of the window, take my TV, stereo, iPhone, iPod, and laptop. Please take all of my jewellery to the Salvation Army or Cash Converters. Then sell my new car, take my front door key away from me and throw me out of the house. Then disown me and never talk to me again. And don’t forget to write me out of your will and leave my share to my brothers."

Well, she didn't put it quite like that... she actually said...

"Dad, this is my new boyfriend, Mohamed"

Wednesday, 23 October 2013

Hungary..............what's the story?

What’s the story with Hungary?  It’s a really big one yet one that’s receiving amazingly little media coverage.  For a start they’ve taken a lot of pain and paid off the usurious IMF loan, but have gone further and told that organisation to get the hell out of their country. They’re now talking of issuing a new debt-free currency and possibly even leaving the EU. The Government there has made it plain that they want to get permanently out of the clutches of the Rothschild central banksters.

Given the dearth of MSM information I reactivated contact with some former colleagues from Hungary. So I’m admitting straight off that I might be getting a biased take. However, all three made very similar assessments, apart from their opinion of PM Victor Orban. So here’s a summary.
The previous Socialist Government was utterly disastrous, sold out the country to ‘international bankers’.  That government was ‘full of Jews and Israelis’ who plundered local companies. The ‘Socialist’ Government was all set for a massive privatisation programme of state assets with the usual suspects set to get massively rich a la the oligarchs under Yeltsin. The schools were packed with ‘liberals’ who trashed traditional learning in favour of the PC multicultural claptrap which is destroying the West today.  A little like what Bela Kun and Georg Lukacs inflicted on that country in earlier times.  Little surprise then that uber-reptile Tony Blair was one of the Government’s strongest foreign supporters.

The current Public Prosecutor is now putting the three previous Prime Ministers on trial, a la Iceland, for the criminal amount of debt into which they plunged the country. The Government has in addition restructured the Board of the Central Bank (Hungarians for Hungary in charge), defining marriage as only between a man and a woman and the family unit as being comprised of husband wife and their children. Even though endorsed by the overwhelming majority of the electorate the EU, for some reason, deemed these moves ‘undemocratic’.  Whatever else they are they’re not undemocratic.
Unbelievably, a member of the Jobbik Party stoof up in Parliament and said "I think it's high time the government made a survey of how many persons of Jewish origin are residing in Hungary, especially of those who are members of Parliament and serve in public office in the government because they pose national security risk to Hungary.”

Oh dear.  Apparently Jobbik’s popularity leapt after this announcement. One correspondent told me that Jews are more unpopular in Hungary than in any other European country.
While some say the country is thriving after these moves others disagree. They say  the VAT rate at 27% is too high, that skilled people are fleeing the country, that the dependency ratio is too high. Also that Orban is a complete chameleon who changes his colour on a purely opportunistic basis. Seems he used to first a young Communist, then a liberal, then a conservative before landing the current patriotic nationalist gig. It's also claimed that he corruptly diverts Government business to his favourite large conglomerates.

Be that as it may the Hungarians, in casting the money changers out of the temple, introducing their own debt-free currency and aggressively reacting against Jewish machinations are doing what nobody has done since a certain Mr. A Hitler during the thirties.  And that’s the surprising thing. I would have assumed that the proverbial ton of bricks would have descended on them and they’d have been whipped into line pronto. For sure, the EU cancelled a whole range of development projects and the interest on existing loans has been jacked up. But if anything the EU’s position seems to have softened in the intervening time and there has been no call for boycotts.  Compare that to Germany in the thirties, or currently the war on Golden Dawn in Greece (which remains just an opposition party).
Interesting, is it not?  I just can’t believe that the international powers that be will let this go.  Maybe they’ll work in a less direct and slower way. Either way developments in Hungary are most interesting. Watch this space.

Monday, 21 October 2013

The stresses of a football manager

A football manager must be one of the most precarious of professions.  Endless stress, dog's abuse from fans and media and, as with politicians, most careers ultimately ending in failure. England's Manager, the affable Roy Hodgson, has suffered the inevitable slings and arrows that accompany the position with remarkable sangfroid and dignity.  But even he was reported to have blown his top as he was engulfed by the latest example of PC gone wild.

At half time in the match against Poland he told what he presumably felt would be an inspirational joke about monkeys in space. Cue an outbreak of PC hysteria, this being seen as a gross insult to the team's black players. (As with so many formerly European countries, about half of the 'England' team is black).  Anguished calls for his resignation filled the air.  For example a four-page complaint from Race for Sport, an off-shoot of the execrable Society for Black Lawyers, called for "cultural intelligence" training (i.e. a spell in a re-education camp) for Hodgson and all football managers.

What makes me smile about this and similar cases is that, contrary to their professed beliefs that we're all equal, 'liberals' deep down know that we're not and that blacks are indeed closer to monkeys. Hence the howls of anguish.

And now to another football manager, fired by his club.  He took this blow to his career so badly that he attacked five cars belonging to club bigwigs.  Door panels were scratched, crosses and symbols were etched across bonnets, tyres were punctured and an offensive word was gouged into paintwork.  Personally I think the relentless pressure for results must have tipped him over the edge.

Even, as in this case, while being Manager of the Nuneaton Under 9 team!

Friday, 18 October 2013

A message to 'R'

There was an interesting comment from 'R' to the previous post.

I've been here a million times and have never said a single word. I enjoy coming here; thank you for the information and the entertainment as well.

Everything you write makes sense and seems to fit well with reality, if a person is paying any attention whatsoever. Also I've done quite a bit of reading on the Jewish question over the past five years or so and the facts appear to be the facts - and they are everywhere on the Internet, as well as right in front of one's face. (not that I claim to be an expert, I'm not - but I've spent some time on this, especially the holocaust.)

What is exceedingly disturbing to me is that most conservatives in the US simply refuse to consider this point of view, AT ALL. This goes for both virtual conservatives, as well as live ones. Or worse, conservatives start screaming "anti-semitism" like a liberal screaming "racism".

Many other readers have provided similar stories, all asking in effect one question: Are we beaten?

Well 'R' we might be but I don't think so. Don't forget that the people you refer to have been brainwashed for their whole lives. When this happens it's very difficult to acknowledge contrary evidence, no matter how strong.  But there is a change in the air.  People are waking up. If as you say you're a regular reader you'll be familiar with my analysis of the disparity between MSM 'reporting' and reader comments. The latter are massively non-PC, by many, many orders of magnitude. And here I'm talking about mainstream outlets, not the likes of Amren.

Bear in mind that in my won case, up until about ten years ago (nearly 60 years old!), I was a textbook guilt-tripped liberal doing voluntary work in Africa for these gentle unfortunate people who had been so exploited by evil Whitey.  My time on the ground there rapidly opened my eyes and lead to my questioning all the crap I'd been fed. And bear in mind that all my life, since I was a child I'd been a voracious reader. Yet I'd bought into the propaganda.

Even by the start of this blog I was an almost unstinting admirer and supporter of all things Jewish. Thanks to the promptings of Uncle Nasty and Kulak, and some others I undertook a research project utilising all the unsanctified material I could get, and now I'm cured of that as well. (I wrote about it here).

Sooooo........less than ten years ago I was typical of the type of person who so vexes you now.  And look at me now!  (Note: I'm I still retain a considerable residue of programming as I'm still unable to utter the 'n' word).  So there is hope.  Will the White race and Western Civilisation be saved?  I really don't know, but what I do know, with absolute certainty, is that a significant change is underway.

So take heart, and keep spreading the word.  Nil desperandum.

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

How to succeed in business without really trying

I used to do some work for venture capital companies, albeit in a small way, many year ago. Mainly by way of assessing for them the technical viability of promising Irish IT companies. It was this experience that left me with an abiding hatred of Microsoft. Horrible predatory crooks who'd stitch up a small local innovator for the equivalent of five minute's Microsoft profits. I wish Gates, Ballmer and the rest of the vile reptilians the worst that fate can bring them in terms of health, wealth and happiness.

On this point I met a guy I knew during this time who focused solely on the VC scene and subsequently went to Silicon Valley, where he's done extremely well.  Given my fascination with Jewish control of just about everything, whetted by GTRman's jaw-dropping revelations, I asked him the score.

First, and I'm not being melodramatic here, he was clearly nervous.  He spoke only on the condition that I would reveal nothing at all that might reveal his identity.  That in itself spoke volumes for me. He told me, and this was no surprise, that Jews control the money. But it went much further than that. Take the case of a start-up with some brilliant new technology. They want to take it to the market but need big investor cash. They find that the first VC they go to offers support, but on condition that you take X and Y on to your board and provide them with a substantial shareholding.  X and Y, as you can guess, will be Jewish.

Not liking this they go to another VC but are made a similar offer. And on it goes. And they get the eerie feeling that their supposedly private negotiations are in fact being fed to other potential investors in advance.  They realise very rapidly that they're trapped and most at this stage cave in.  There are more stubborn innovators who'll fight this racket, and they might get lucky with, for example, some Asian investor.  But then stories begin emerging in the technical press. 'Industry sources' tell us that Company X's product has hit serious technical problems. This is then picked up by the financial press and the independent IT king-makers like Gartner and Forrester (both heavily Jewish owned and run, by the way).  Such treatment brings even the toughest to their knees.

But it gets even better. Let's take a Facebook-like situation, whereby the ownership and origins of the intellectual capital come into dispute.  There are lots of Larry Summers' around who will use their positions to find in favour of the Jewish protagonist, as Summers did at Harvard. And in the unlikely event that you're still standing after all of this you'll find the courts will be organised against you.  The case and/or the appeal will - inevitably - be heard by a Federal Judge with a name like Ruth Silverstein who will - equally inevitably - find in your adversaries' favour.

So that goes a long way towards explaining the incredibly high Jewish involvement at the top levels of tech companies. It seems that once you control the sources of funding and the arbitration process you control the whole game.  I believe it's commonly known as the Farnsworth Syndrome. This stems from the fact that television was invented by a farm boy from Idaho named Farnsworth, but he ended up with nothing once the Jewish Mafia at RCA had finished with him.

That's not to say goyim can't survive. But to do so they must recognise that this ecosystem is  a Jewish one, and you play by their rules. If you do that you'll be allowed some of the pie. At the cost of your integrity, if nothing else.

My take on all of this?  Well, they're ruling by fear and coercion at present.  Will it last? Maybe. Because Whites are totally atomised, no solidarity whatsoever. (In fact my friend told me that any suggestion of contributing to a White or traditional cause would instantly result in the Mel Gibson treatment). And the problem is exacerbated by the fact that Chinese and Indians now have their own ethnic Mafias as well, Mafias which, by the way, don't have the slightest hesitation in stealing IP and rebranding it for themselves.

In such an environment it's hard to be optimistic, is it not?