Tuesday, 31 March 2015

The War On Boys. And its implications.

If the White male embodies The Enemy, destroy him before he reaches maturity. That seems to be part of The Program and it's going swimmingly. In every White nation schools have been turned into feminised hiveminded ghettos, strangled by rules geared, not towards learning or developing life skills but towards eliminating any form of conflict or offence. Hell on earth for boys, who are being transformed - reengineered - into little women. Should they rebel the full vindictive weight of latter-day Nurse Ratchetts will descend on them. If humiliating punishments, expulsions and sensitivity training boot-camps don't work then they get reclassified under one of the multiple 'conditions'  fabricated to diagnose and treat...........well, boys being boys. Little Johnny getting bored with his flower arranging class? He must have Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. So tranquilise him with Ritalin.

Being a boy has become a condition to be cured.

Across the country, schools are policing and punishing the distinctive, assertive sociability of boys. Many popular games have vanished from school playgrounds. At some schools, tug of war has been replaced with a "tug of peace" (I'm serious!!) while others are being phased out, being deemed too damaging to self-esteem and/or too violent. Young boys, with few exceptions, love action narratives. These usually involve heroes, bad guys, rescues and shoot-ups. As boys’ play proceeds, plots become more elaborate and the boys more engaged. This is how they learn and develop manly life skills. But action narratives have been replaced by stories of how Bill became a girl and is much happier now.

This war on boys has unsurprisingly had an impact on their academic performance which is deteriorating in relation to their female counterparts and even in absolute terms. Boys are increasingly disengaging from the school environment.  All of which seems certain to make a feminazi's moustache quiver with schadenfreude. But be careful what you wish for. Because the demise of the male will take with it  the comfortable lives of the drones who currently - unknowimgly - live off his creations. Every industrial and technological advance, almost without exception, has been the creation of the White male. (Jews have been accorded honorary White status for the purpose of this exercise).  The real breakthroughs have derived from those of stratospherically high intelligence (IQ in excess of  say 160), a cohort largely the preserve of the White male.

You see, whereas girls/women may on average score about the same as boys/men, the latter dominate among the highly intelligence, and the more intelligent you get the higher the proportion of males. This is particularly true when it comes to subjects like maths, computing and science. The corollary of course is that males have a proportionally higher ratio of retards than do women, who are clustered around the centre of the IQ histogram.

Now consider how women and vibrants of various hues enjoy and benefit from using the modern conveniences produced by advanced technologies. They drive their automatic cars and call their friends on the oh-so-simple iPhones. While not having a clue about what goes on under the hood. I have a simple technology rule of thumb: The easier it is to use the more complex the work done under the hood. And this explains the colossal dropout rate for women and vibrants from Computer Science courses everywhere. They think that computers are simple and they'd like to be 'techies' (like this shrike). But on taking up the course they find to their horror that they require deep analytical skills, strong maths, that there's only one right answer.....no  touchy-feely democratic consensus stuff here. And such draconian requirements blow them away.

Look at things this way. White males have created everything that differentiates us from a Third World standard of living. Or from that of the First World a century ago. Try some 'reverse forecasting' here for illustrative purposes. Several studies have shown patents awarded to male scientists to be at least twice the number awarded to females. Using that crude 2:1 ratio we can infer that the Industrial Revolution would have occurred about a century later than it actually did. And given that most inventions are founded on earlier inventions and research we can reasonably infer that we'd only be in the early stages of the IR had we been relying solely on female scientists and inventors.

So the modern feminazi waging war on our boys would be doing so without the benefit of telephone, cars, vacuum cleaners, air travel, let alone their treasured vibrators and dildos. And while the grrrls like Carly Fiorina and Tina Brown are busy in the boardrooms running their companies into the ground their manboobed husbands will be at home, furiously masturbating to internet porn. Under such a dispensation the world as we know it will come, if not crashing, at least spiralling down to a level we now can hardly imagine. Just like the brown America of 2050.  When such comes to pass the world created by the innovative genius, competitive spirit and inquisitive mind of the White male will have become merely a fading memory.

Be careful what you wish for.

Sunday, 29 March 2015

Lee Kuan Yew

Was going to write a piece on the amazing Lee Kuan Yew, the man who transformed Singapore from a malarial swamp into a technologically advanced First World nation. He achieved this despite being surrounded by a sea of Muslims and with a large Muslim minority within his own national boundaries. And he made little secret of his contempt for the Religion Of Peace and its adherents. He was also a total realist when it came to race, feminism and multiculturalism and not afraid to call, if I may use the metaphor, a spade a spade. 

So rather than write about them let the great man's words speak for themselves.

I started off believing all men were equal. I now know that's the most unlikely thing ever to have been, because millions of years have passed over evolution, people have scattered across the face of this earth, been isolated from each other, developed independently, had different intermixtures between races, peoples, climates, soils... I didn't start off with that knowledge. But by observation, reading, watching, arguing, asking, and then bullying my way to the top, that is the conclusion I've come to.
The Bell curve is a fact of life. The blacks on average score 85 per cent on IQ and it is accurate, nothing to do with culture. The whites score on average 100. Asians score more … the Bell curve authors put it at least 10 points higher. [He's wrong here, it's about 3% and that applies only to North-East Asians] These are realities that, if you do not accept, will lead to frustration because you will be spending money on wrong assumptions and the results cannot follow.

And now in America itself after 30 years of experimenting with the Great Society programmes, there is widespread crime and violence, children kill each other with guns, neigbourhoods are insecure, old people feel forgotten, families are falling apart. And the media attacks the integrity and character of your leaders with impunity, drags down all those in authority and blames everyone but itself.  
The key question is: “do you make the Hispanics Anglo-Saxons in culture or do they make you more Latin American in culture?”

Multiculturalism will destroy America.  

How does the Malay [Malay = synonym for Muslim] in the kampong find his way out into this modernised civil society? By becoming servants of the 0.3 per cent who would have the money to hire them to clean their shoe, open their motorcar doors? 

From WikiLeaks website:
MM Lee responded that orthodox Islam was a powerful force capable of recruiting volunteers for terroristgroups. He noted Singapore's experience in 2001 and 2002 in dealing with Jemaah Islamiyah's terrorist plots in Singapore and characterized Islam as a "venomous religion." The problem of Islamic terrorism would not be easily extirpated, observed MM Lee.

Other communities have easier integration – friends, inter-marriages and so on – than Muslims... I could say, today, we can integrate all religions and races, except Islam. 
If, for instance, you put in a Malay officer who's very religious and who has family ties in Malaysia in charge of a machine gun unit, that's a very tricky business. 

If you don't include your own women graduates in the breeding pool and leave them on the shelf, you would end up a more stupid society... So what happens? There will be less bright people to support dumb people in the next generation. 

Equal employment opportunities, yes, but we shouldn't get our women into jobs where they cannot, at the same time, be mothers...our most valuable asset is in the ability of our people, yet we are frittering away this asset through the unintended consequences of changes in our education policy and equal opportunities for women. This has affected their traditional role … as mothers, the creators and protectors of the next generation.

Had the mix in Singapore been different, had it been 75% Indians, 15% Malays and the rest Chinese, it [the Singapore success story] would not have worked.

If only we had his likes in the West.....

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

What's the deal with Jews and gun control?

The American obsession with owning guns has always been a source of amazement to me. Why would any civilian want to be armed like a commando or have a house resembling Woolwich Arsenal? And if hunting - i.e. killing animals for pleasure - is your thing then why not take a job in an abattoir? Having said that the gun control movement there makes no sense in that probably 95% of murders are committed, not by ordinary citizens, rather by criminals who will not be even remotely deterred by more restrictive legislation. So why the raft of legislation and supporting propaganda over the last twenty years or so?

And boy, what a tsunami it's been. Doing some research on the subject I was overwhelmed, staggered, by the sheer number and scope of the laws introduced over that time frame. Looking more closely I was also struck by the overwhelming Jewish role in the whole control movement. The big breakthrough came with the Gun Control Act of 1968 which was introduced by Emanuel Celler (who also did sterling work in opening America to the Third World tidal wave) while later on Senators Howard Metzenbaum, Herbert Kohl, Diane Feinstein, Arlen Specter, Joe Lieberman, Barbara Boxer and Frank Lautenberg continued the good work. Same thing happened in the House. And of course where would we be without good old Chucky Schumer and Mike Bloomberg, who never ever give the subject a rest?

And it's not just politicians. As far as I can see all of the major gun control lobby groups have major Jewish representation and financing, with the corollary that almost all major Jewish organisations support the restriction project.  This from the Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility which represents a virtual who's who of leading "American" Jewish organisations including: "The Anti-Defamation League, Bet Alef, Congregation Beth Shalom, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Jewish Family Service, Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle, Kavana Cooperative, Kol HaNeshamah, National Council of Jewish Women, Stroum Jewish Community Center, Temple Beth Am, Temple Beth Hatfiloh, Temple Beth Or, Temple B’Nai Torah, Temple De Hirsch Sinai, Tikvah Chadashah, Herzl Ner Tamid, Temple Beth El and the Washington State Holocaust Education Resource Center."

Why would Jews be so hostile to private gun ownership? After all, they portray themselves  - ad nauseam - as hapless hard-working victims of state-sponsored pogroms throughout history. But like so much of the Approved Version of History this trope doesn't stand up. In actual fact Jews have always managed to inveigle themselves into the role of eminence grise, at the side of or behind the actual rulers, as 'advisors', enablers, financiers etc. This role, so obvious in every Western country today, seems to have applied for centuries, even in Muslim regions. My own research into pogroms suggests that for the most part - there most certainly have been exceptions - but for the most part they've been spontaneous outbursts by the hoi polloi.

As an explanation for this apparent paradox I offer the experience of colonialism. Understand that every colonial power assigned top priority to disarming the colonised population. Check out this site to get an idea of the blood, treasure and variety of tactics (carrots, sticks, deception) deployed by the British Empire in separating the natives from their arms. Am I uncharitable in suggesting that Jews regard America as colonised territory, a territory in which their position relative to the general population is analogous to  that of - for example - Whites in Kenya under colonialism? The nightmare scenario for the settler there was the prospect of being surrounded by well-armed Kikuyu or Matabele tribesmen. Which explains why West Bank settlers are armed to the teeth day and night. (A practice with which Feinstein et al seem, strangely, to have no difficulty.) So maybe in the fevered imagination of Jewish gun control advocates White Christians represent the natives outside the compound poised to slit their throats at the first opportunity.

In that case if you are the Government  doesn't it make sense for guns to be controlled by the Government?

Tuesday, 24 March 2015

Norway's Alan Shatter

Meet Erwin Kohn, President of the Jewish Community in Norway and also - and you'll be surprised by this - Deputy Director of the Norwegian Centre Against Racism. Erwin is a busy boy. In this interview you can hear him say "Norwegian society is too homogeneous, too white. So there is a job to be done." And we all know the nature of that job, don't we, children?  Erwin shakes his head wearily. But at least money isn't a problem.  "We have generous funding" he assures the interviewer.. And who provides this funding?  Why, it's the Norwegian Government. You know, the ones sworn to represent the very people being blended out by Kohn's project.

But despite the size of the task, much good work has already been undertaken. Most of eastern Oslo has by now been enriched beyond recognition by New Norwegians from Pakistan, Somalia and Nigeria. With generous helpings of Iraqis, Kosovars and Albanians. Why, Mohammed is now the most popular boy's name in Oslo, the nation's capital. Mind you this has not been an unmixed blessing, not least because an epidemic of rape has coincided with the arrival of the New Norwegians. And the police report that every single rape in Oslo over a recent five year period was attributable to an enricher. Every single one. There's more. The armed forces now accepts hijab-clad female warriors for the "prophet" into their ranks

So could Oslo become another Malmo, of which the Jewish Tablet has this to say:

"Today, Rosengård has become the symbol of ghettoization at the heart of the Scandinavian welfare state. Out of Rosengård’s 22,000 inhabitants, 89 percent are immigrants or children of immigrants. Only 39 percent of residents between the ages of 20 and 64 are employed.
In 2008, when a mosque in Rosengård was refused a lease renewal, riots erupted. Cars were burned, and homemade bombs were thrown at police. Fire-fighters, ambulance drivers, and paramedics were welcomed in Rosengård with rocks and spitting. The Fire and Rescue service made the decision that ambulances could no longer enter the housing project without police escort, a policy that lasted for a few months.   Gangs command the street and deal drugs openly. Recently, the Swedish Postal Service decided that it would no longer deliver mail in the area, since its mail carriers were subjected to repeated attacks."
Seems to be what President Kohn has in mind for his adopted country (he's actually Hungarian).

And here's what Judith Popinski a Holocau$t() survivor (I know, yet another one)  has to say about Malmo. "I never though I'd see this kind of hatred again in my lifetime. Not in Sweden anyway. This new hatred comes from Muslim immigrants. The Jewish people are afraid now."

Oy vey, the sufferink. The sufferink!

Maybe this lady should have a word with Kohn. And ask him, well, what the fuck he's up to in recreating a new Rosengård in Norway. Actually I can be of help here. I could explain to her that Jewish leaders in White countries really don't give a damn about the Judith Popinskis of this world, whether they suffer personal attacks or their synagogues get bombed.  These little people are unimportant, their travails the collateral damage of a far more strategic project. The objective of which is to to destroy the ethnic, racial and religious cohesion of Western countries. In other words to destroy the very essence of those - our - countries.

As for you Kohn, you despicable back-stabbing nation-wrecking ingrate I hope that one day you roast in the Seventh Circle of Hell along with your fellow-travelling fifth columnists such as Alan Shatter, Barbara Lerner Specter and Anetta Kahane.

Saturday, 21 March 2015

Heretical thoughts on economics

You know, I was sitting down today when this this crazy idea crossed my mind. I thought....maybe, just maybe, economists aren't wrong about everything after all.  Now I admit that when it comes to economic forecasting you'd be better off going by Mystic Meg at the fairground. But what about measuring Gross National Product?

We know for example that when a burned-down house gets rebuilt the cost of rebuilding will be added to GNP figures even though all that's been done is to restore the status quo ante. All the work done by the builders and the materials they used are added to the production figures. Then there's the recent practice of including the services of prostitutes and the sale of illegal drugs. And why not? After all, how is this any different to including the services of psychiatrists  (who have never cured a patient in all recorded history) or the sale of cigarettes?

So maybe economists are correct again when they extol - as they endlessly do - the economic benefits of mass immigration. And the more I thought about this the more I began to realise that, by Jove, they had a point. An excellent point. Here are just a few examples:

() Building all those extra jail places

() Hiring additional police, judges and prison staff to capture and incarcerate criminal enrichers

() Gynaecologists treating female genital mutilation victims and birthing all those little turdlers we see running around every day

() Lawyers endlessly working asylum tourist appeals through the court system

() The velocity of money (M1 or M2) contribution to GDP resulting from injecting billions of Euros in enricher welfare payments into the economy every year

Now I am not, a la Oscar Wilde, lightly playing lightly with ideas here. My musings have highly practical implications for every Eurozone country. Why? Because budget deficits are supposed not to exceed 3% of GDP. Hence the bigger a country's GDP figure the bigger the deficit allowed in absolute terms. And the bigger the deficit the more money politicians have available to buy votes. Why else do you think the Italians, Irish and Greeks...and in fact almost all EZ countries are so keen to boost nominal GDP?

That's the reason.  Seriously

So, in the spirit of magnanimity for which I'm renowned I freely offer these thought to the world. Or at least the EZ world.

Wednesday, 18 March 2015

A case of rats and sinking ships?

Hark!  What's that squeaking and splashing I hear in the background? Can it be the sound of rats deserting sinking ships?


I ask because Trevor Phillips, one of the most astute and perceptive rats on board seems to be restless. For those of you who haven't heard of Trevor, well he is - or was - Britain's "Equality Czar". (And look, I'm not referring to the Trevor Phillips in Grand Theft Auto, FFS!). Arriving in Britain as a penniless teenager from the jungle swamps of Guyana it took him no time at all to identify the endless stream of White Man's goodies available to any black brandishing a Race Card. After getting the British taxpayer to fund his education he went from one lucrative public "service" sinecure to the next.  Never did a productive day's work in his life but in due course was appointed Chairman of the super-quango the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Here he (cough) 'earned' £130,000 per annum for three days a week 'service' and exercised control over a £70 million taxpayer funded budget.

Given his tribal origins this was like letting a fox into the hen house and Trev didn't take long to introduce Guyana-style governance to the Commission (whose staff is 70% minority - so much for equality) which became mired in corruption from the outset. A notable example was his awarding a contract to his buddy Samir for the sum of £300,000. This raised eyebrows. Unsurprisingly, as the estimated cost was £30,000 while the lowest bid was £12,000! But Trev brazened it out. Didn't bat an eyelid.  And then he came up with a really cracking wheeze. He directed the EHRC to harry and persecute any organisation deemed to be insensitive or insufficiently diligent when it came to equality. Especially racial equality.

But although persecuting them he also offered them a solution to their problem, a la Rev'unds Jesse and Al. He formed a private company (the Equate Organisation) that would - for a generous fee - provide equality and sensitivity training for the offenders. So as head of the publicly-funded EHRC he issued proceeding against an organisation. Then after a quick visit to the cloakroom he was back, this time wearing his Equate Organisation cap to make an offer they couldn't refuse. The conflict of interest was so blatant that even the pusillanimous Board of Directors rebelled and mass resignations followed. Despite this and the ensuing public furore he was nonetheless reappointed by that wicked witch Harriet Harman. (His initial success also enabled him to acquire a light-skinned Indian wife. But following his rise to the dizzy heights of the EHRC - and the plunder that came with it - he was able to trade her  in for an upmarket fully White one. The de rigueur status symbol for ambitious blacks.)

But this is just background and you can read in detail about his colourful commercial exploits here. And his explanation for the tsunami of corruption?  "I may have been 'naive'." Now there's one thing Phillips is not and that is naive.  In fact he's an unscrupulous conniving opportunist ready to leap onto whatever successful bandwagon emerges on the scene. And hence my earlier reference to rats and sinking ships . Because this guy has come out in the most trenchant way against multiculturalism and mass immigration.  Really gone in heavy on it. So I ask, does he sense an impending epochal shift? As he sniffs the social and political winds do his delicate quivering nostrils sense a dangerous restlessness growing among the natives? And is he positioning himself as the noble selfless black immigrant whose integrity forced him to ask the Questions-That-Cannot-Be-Asked?

Now admittedly he has raised similar views in the past....but still.

Watch this space.

Sunday, 15 March 2015

What's Shat The Rat up to now?

The calls and texts came thick and fast last night. "Turn on the TV. That bastard Shatter is on helping the Muslim terrorist who's in jail in Egypt". And similar. Some background. There's this "Irish"... "teen", a lovely kind innocent dindonufins moderate Muslim who's in jail in Egypt. It seems the poor lad just went over there for a holiday, and when there - you know kids - publicly burned his Irish passport and renounced Irish citizenship, and then by sheer coincidence dropped into a mosque where - again by sheer coincidence - the local Muslim Brotherhood were planning a terrorist attack.

You know yourself.  That kind of thing happens to all of us all of the time.  Anyway his capture by the Egyptian security services rapidly reignited his enthusiasm for Irish citizenship and he's now demanding that the Irish Government - you know, the one whose passport he burned -  use every means possible to spring him from the slammer. Indignant are his family that "we" are not doing more to help "a fellow Irishman".  But that's not really the point of this post. You can if you want get more background on the would-be ISIS beheader here. Suffice to say that he and his family, who have been given sanctuary and citizenship here, are up to their necks in extremist activities.

No, the issue is why Shat the Rat would leap to the defense of extremist Muslims, his sworn enemies. As I pointed out at the beginning, this has caused consternation in many quarters, not least among this blog's readers. And it's even garnered Shatter some brownie points (so to speak) on the deluded MSM for his 'magnanimous gesture' in supporting the ragheads. Given, as we all know but dare not say, their ambition to slit the throat of any Jew they can lay their hands on.

So allow me to explain. Shatter is doing the same as HochJuden in every White country: Turning formerly ethnically and culturally homogeneous societies into fissiparous, balkanised, miscegenated multicultural hell-holes. That's 'good for the Jews' you see.  And to hell with the rest of us. Muslims aren't good for much but as agents of this nefarious agenda they're a Godsend. Will a few lower-level Jews get whacked by way of this? Undoubtedly.  Will a few synagogues get burned down? Of course. But it's a small price to pay for the destruction of the hated White Christian societies.

And that my friends is why Shatter, the reptilian Fifth Columnist, was on that TV show last night.

Wednesday, 11 March 2015

Revenge Of The Nerds

Women and technology don't mix. Black women in technology are as incongruous as a pork chop in a synagogue. It's not that women are stupid. It's just that they're...different.  (Fred Reed has a good article on the issue here)  In my time I have indeed come across a few actual feminine women in technology but most are just useless unproductive orbiters, parasiting on the real work done by White males, The exemplar you'll find to be a shrieking malodorous man-jawed dyke who could sweep the floor with her pubic hair.

Exhibit 1, Adria Richards.  This "techie" was at a conference when she heard two White male developers behind her - she wasn't in their conversation, didn't even know them - make an apparently lewd joke by referring to 'dongles' and 'forking your repository'.  At which point 'I stood up slowly, turned around and took three clear photos. Yesterday the future of programming was on the line and I made myself heard. [My italics]” 

The hag made herself heard by first complaining to the event organisers, which resulted in the nerds being carpeted for their 'insensitivity'. But that wasn't enough for this latter-day Joan of Ark. Now get a load of this. "Accountability was important. These guys sitting right behind me felt safe in the crowd. I got that and realised that being anonymous was fuelling their behaviour. This is know as Deindividuation.  Theories of Deindividuation propose that it is a psychological state of decreased self-evaluation causing antinormative and disinhibited behaviour. Deindividuation theory seeks to provide an explanation for a variety of antinormative behaviour such as violent crowds, lynch mobs, etc...."

Did you get that?

And of course this "techie" was nothing of the sort. (A bit like this guy). Otherwise she'd have known what a dongle is (for God's sake!!!) and that 'forking a repository' means taking a copy of another programmer's code and working on it independently. Some 'techie', isn't she? Actually her official job title is - hold on to something solid here - "Developer Evangelist". In other words an affirmative action black female made-up job which involves little more than rudimentary PR. Still it paid well enough for her to rent a $5k a month apartment. Diversity ain't cheap.

So what did she do after the guys had been been warned by the organisers? She took to the Twitter airwaves, berating the unfortunate joker ('Hank') while revealing to the world his full personal and professional details. This in turn activated the hive of dykes and perpetually offended parasites who feed on the technology industry as lampreys ("characterized by a funnel-like sucking mouth") leech on healthy fish. These shrieking hags demanded his firing. His company of course immediately caved in, leaving a productive developer with a wife and two kids out on the road and with a black mark (pun intended) on his bio. And by the way. this despite the customary profuse and abject grovelling, which I could have told him only whets the ghouls' appetite for further human sacrifice. So to summarise she eavesdropped on a private conversation, took a photograph of those conversing without permission, and posted it and her slanderous and inflammatory comments on several social media sites. There was no sexual harassment, no sexism, no "female objectification".

So was she regretful for the damage done, bearing in mind the grovelling apologies? Now listen to this - this creature really is a piece of work. “Not too bad. He’s a white male. I’m a black Jewish(!) female. He was saying things that could be inferred as offensive to me, sitting in front of him. Maybe it was 'Hank' who started all of this.. No one would have known he got fired until he complained. Maybe he’s to blame for complaining that he got fired. [My italics] It was his own actions that resulted in his own firing, yet he framed it in a way to blame me… If I had a spouse and two kids to support I certainly would not be telling ‘jokes’ like he was doing at a conference. Oh but wait, I have compassion, empathy, morals and ethics to guide my daily life choices. [My italics] I often wonder how people like him make it through life seemingly unaware of how ‘the other’ lives in the same world he does but with countless less opportunities.”

Isn't this just breathtaking? Have you ever come across a more entitled, egotistical, self-obsessed, sanctimonious, self-righteous harridan in your whole life? And an utter hypocrite. See the third picture down. Another Twitter extract....not so much sexual innuendo there, more full-frontal bawdiness. But of course, as every schoolboy know, if you're a black 'Jewish' female the rules don't apply to you. Only to the people whose work and dedication enable your parasitical lifestyle.

So what's all this about the nerds striking back then? Yes indeed, I bring you tidings of great joy. It takes a lot to activate nerds, notorious as they are for, well, nerdiness. But this creature and her antics were so grotesque and vile that even the nerds logged out of World Of Warcraft and declared real war instead. And their response represented a tantalising glimpse of the White male's potential untapped power, power just waiting to be unleashed. Because in short order they had brought her employers' website down, a Denial of Service attack overwhelming their Web servers and effectively bringing their operations to a close. The company was given an ultimatum: The attacks will stop once Richards gets fired. Publicly. Which she was by close of business (so to speak) the following day.

Now get out your handerchief and if you've got tears prepare to shed 'em. “I cried a lot, journaled and escaped by watching movies. I felt betrayed. I felt abandoned. I felt ashamed. I felt rejected. I felt alone.’’ And it's gratifying to learn that death threats continued even after she was fired. "Things got very bad for her. She had to disappear for six months. Her entire life was being evaluated by the Internet. It was not a good situation for her at all.”

And as far as I can judge she's still unemployed. And probably unemployable, certainly as - oh, ma achin' sides - a Software Evangelist.

I just love a story with a happy ending, don't you?

Sunday, 8 March 2015

The Incredible Disappearing Man

Of course you all know of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. Who doesn't?  Legendary Russian dissident during the Soviet era, prisoner in the gulags, starved, tortured, ostracised.  But never broken. He spoke truth to power like few have ever done. His novels such as The Gulag Archipelago, The First Circle and Cancer Ward were not only brilliant literature but offered the rarest of insights into the life of a dissident in the USSR.  He came to be regarded as one of the most eminent writers and philosophers of his age.  Which contributed to his being awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1970 "for the ethical force with which he has pursued the indispensable traditions of Russian literature".

Feted wherever he went, his books became international best sellers, translated into dozens of languages, the world was at his feet.  Then almost overnight it all stopped. He became a non-person. The transformation was virtually unprecedented in the field of literature. Why did this happen? Because Alex stepped on the Third Rail.  Well he didn't so much step on it, rather dived on it full length. You see he wrote a book called 200 Years Together that traced the Jews' colourful relationship with the Russian people and especially their role in the Bolshevik Revolution and its ensuing murderous tyranny.

He didn't pull his punches.  He placed Soviet Jews centre place in perpetrating the worst mass murders of the 20th century. While acknowledging that some Jews also suffered under this tyranny he clarified that it was not as Jews per se, rather that they were in the wrong faction at the wrong time. Solzhenitsyn's own estimate for the number of Christians (his word) who died was 60 million.

He documented all of this in meticulous detail.... names, dates, times. But he did something else, something more insidious and dangerous. Something that had strategic international consequences for the Tribe. For a start he shone a light on the extraordinary Jewish capacity to magic themselves into the position of victimhood irrespective of their actual accountability. This in turn depended on - as he pointedly noted - their uncanny ability to seize control of media outlets.  "There are pages of this history which one does not open without trembling. And these are the pages that are systematically and purposefully eradicated from the consciousness of the Jews."

Other observations that cut to the bone included their practice of manipulating the legal framework to reflect Jewish interests.  (Think "hate" legislation.) “Russian people are now confronted by a Jew both as their judge and hangman. Why was it that anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka could count with high probability on standing before a Jewish investigator or being shot by a Jew?" He meticulously debunked Jewish writers who sought to portray Soviet Jews as having no choice in what they did. 'Just following orders'  How ironic is that? He carefully traces the ways in which Jews, both within the USSR and internationally, favoured and supported Jewish interests under the cloak of universalistic altruism.

Sound familiar?

I haven't even begun to describe what he wrote in '200 Years Together' not least because I haven't read it, only certain chapters.  So why have I not read it? Aha, therein lies a tale!  You see, Solzhenitsyn's legendary status and guarantee of vast sales would in normal circumstances have had international publishers slavering at the prospect of getting their hands on the rights. But none did. None wanted it. It was never published in the West. In fact, incredible as it seems it has never been formally translated into English! Given that English translations exist for almost every half-assed writing in the most obscure of languages the disappearance of 200 Years Together is mind-blowing. The author himself became a non-person just as he had in the USSR.

Think about it. It is, as I said, mind-blowing. What sort of pressure could have resulted in every Western publishing house, every Western TV company, every Western magazine being intimidated into passing up such a unique and hugely profitable publishing coup?  How exactly was this Jewish power exercised?  Was it overt, subtle, physical, financial....or what?

It truly is frightening.

Is it any wonder that the American armed forces were afraid of commemorating the attack on the USS Liberty? Or that the country's so-called legislators should prostrate themselves before their true rulers in the sight of all?

Friday, 6 March 2015

A German Jihad is born

Happy days, a cause for celebration. We sup yet again from the chalice of diversity because a 34 stone (240 kilo) Turkish land-whale in Germany has given birth to a 13 pound (6 kilo) monster which she has suitably named Jihad (Holy War). Can't you just see it in a few years time, mother sticking bloated head of the window and calling 'Holy War, your dinner is ready'. So very Germanic. He'll fit right into the multicultural paradise of the New Germany.

The land-whale reminds me of this creature who I described as "just following the dictates of her Darwinian script and at taxpayer expense eats, drinks, breeds and defecates, wallowing in the putrescence of her chosen state."

But there is an upside to this development as the case has - surprisingly - been afforded extensive coverage in the German media. And what could better exemplify the catastrophe that is multiculturalism than  seeing their taxes showered on a bloated, semi-literate free-loader and her 13 other children, a free-loader so culturally deaf as to name one of her turdlers after the people blowing up the taxpayers' country?

Andreas, a German reader of this blog tells me that reader comments in the local media are almost universally hostile while the number of deleted comments bears mute testimony to the public's feelings.

I close with one question: Did the father of Jihad inseminate the birthing unit by using a fire hose? If not, how?

Tuesday, 3 March 2015

The Nemtsov killing: Cui bono?

In the normal course of events I'd have assumed that Putin had been involved in the murder of  his opponent Boris Nemtsov either directly or indirectly.  But times are certainly not normal given the constant provocation of Russia by the 'West' - primarily the USA and its lapdog Britain.

Having  applied punitive sanctions, conspired to crash the price of oil.  provoked civil war and bankruptcy in Ukraine  (whose gold has been whipped out to America for 'safe-keeping'), we now learn that oily Dave Cameron plans to send 250 'military advisers' to that unfortunate country. As if they needed more soldiers.

Even Mikhail Gorbachev himself has warned of  the danger of nuclear war if the provocations continue.

On cue the Western MSM, just like they did with flight MH-17 (notice how that story suddenly disappeared once the black box was analysed?) and, without a shred of evidence, assigned responsibility to Putin. And Nemtsov became a fearless national martyr, the Man Who Dared Challenge The Great Dictator. So here's a little offsetting background on our hero Nemtzov. Prominent in Yeltsin's Jewish Mafia, after the fall of Communism he organised the  handing over of numerous multi-billion dollar publicly owned enterprises and resources to the appointed ones for a pittance . Thus he midwifed the birth of the Russian Oligarchs.

Before getting his hands on the loot at national level he had had a dry run as Governor of the Nizhny Novgorod region, a position he reached at the remarkably tender age of 29. Purely on ability, I have no doubt. Yeltsin then catapulted him and another top Jewish Mafioso Anatoly Chubais into "direct unsupervised control" of the state asset disposal. Having duly enriched himself and The Family he then, like Khodorovsky, sought elective political power. This attempt became legend as he made his election appeal - on behalf of the 'common man' - from the lounge of his luxurious private jet.  As you can imagine this didn't go down too well with the newly impoverished nation. His appeal was as a consequence limited and he was nowhere close to being an electoral threat to Putin.

On any occasion such as this one must ask cui bono?  Putin has gained nothing apart from getting rid of an irritating gadfly. But the downside for him is major, providing a propaganda bonanza for his enemies, turning up the volume of the war drums in the West, opening the possibility of a "Maidan Moment" of destabilisation in Moscow, and undermining the chances of a peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian and Syrian crises. So if Putin was indeed behind this he's made a very bad and stupid move. And we don't associate him with bad and stupid moves.

I don't for one minute claim to know what happened or who's responsible. But it looks all too like another dangerous escalation of hostilities by Russia's enemies. I truly believe that the world is in serious danger of a major war, a war without doubt provoked by the ZioCons in America and their British satrap.

Our best hope of avoiding it lies in the European nations showing a bit of backbone for once and telling the ZioCon War Party in America to take a flying fuck.

But I'm not holding my breath.