Friday, 30 December 2016

This year's greatest gift

2016 has given us many reasons to be hopeful, not least by way of the Trump and Brexit phenomena. But most of all as the year the (((mainstream media))) lost its credibility and therefore its power. This was the year of the Great Media Awakening, when the general public began to realise the true nature of the lies, equivocations and evasions, of the mind-rot peddled to them as news.

Earning credibility is a slow and painstaking process. Losing it can be devastatingly fast. Ordinary people can now discern The Agenda, maybe for now through a glass darkly, but soon they'll meet it face to face. Hard to see any way back for the presstitutes now that the internet provides a cornucopia of hard news, research, well written content - and most of all an alternative. Even The Donald, to their horror, largely ignored the MSM, instead communicating directly with the public via social media. And I believe that as President he'll still do this. I also believe that the full impact of this year's developments has yet to dawn fully on the media whores.

Their reaction, such as it is, has been soooooo, like, like .....pre-internet? I mean how McCarthy-era is it to ban readers from commenting, to close down offending outlets, to jail Thought Criminals? How about a spot of book burning for real authenticity? And now their war on "fake news"? Oh PULEEZE!!! In fact this has hit them with something even worse than distrust: Derision. Yes, there's now widespread laughter and ridicule at the idea of the MSM chasing down "fake news".

None of us of course will lose the run of ourselves here. The enemy still controls the commanding heights of the communications arena.....TV and print media, Hollywood, the main internet and social media platforms. And of course every Western government. We're still a bit like the samizdat rebels in the USSR.

But look how things worked out for them.

Tuesday, 27 December 2016

A development to celebrate

I see that the Democrats might elect a black Muslim as Chairman of the Democratic National Convention. I hope they do. Just like I hope the British Labour Party keep electing the likes of Dianne Abbot and Imram Khan as their public faces. And they probably will because as one splendid lady recently informed us 'we don't need White people running our (sic) parties anymore'.

Now much and all as I dread blacks being free to deploy their legendary organisational skills against us I otherwise welcome these developments because they'll accelerate the move to ethnicity-based politics. Or to be more specific they'll encourage Whites to finally wake up and embrace their own identity politics. Democrats and Labour will duly degenerate into a rag bag collection of blacks, browns, Muslims, sexual freaks and White cucks with nothing to bind them other than their antipathy to normal Whites. Cohesive they will not be. On the other hand an implicitly White party will, in an identity politics context, have every reason to be cohesive.

The position of Jews under such a dispensation is intriguing. Obviously White ethnic consciousness embodied in strong united Parties is their stuff of nightmares. But a black/brown/Muslim melange could be even worse, not least  because it'd give short shrift to any attempt at leveraging  muh Holocaust.  Bear in mind too that the Alt-Right, the genesis of White identity, carries a deep vein of scepticism towards the Tribe and their role in White displacement.

So yes, celebrate the ongoing takeover of the Dems and Labour by angry anti-White minorities. And in due course enjoy the sight of them scrabbling over the scraps they get thrown by their ethnically conscious White rulers. That's assuming we haven't sent them back to the hell-holes whence they emerged.

Saturday, 24 December 2016

Thursday, 22 December 2016

A rhetorical device

When dealing with whinging immigrants most of us have probably used a derivative of 'well if you don't like it here just fuck off back to where you came from'. But based on the principle that if you're explaining you're losing maybe posing this recommendation in question form might be better.

'Why are you here in a White country?'  'If White countries are so bad for you why didn't you go to a non-White one?' 

'Can we assume by your choosing to live among Whites ahead of your own you see Whites as more desirable co-citizens? If so aren't we justified in not wanting these less desirable people coming to our countries?'

'If your own people and culture are so good can we assume you'll be heading back at the first opportunity? If not, why not? If it's the case that you actually prefer to live in a White country can we expect that from now on you'll STFU and just be glad we left you in?'

This structure can of course also be used when arguing with libtards about whingeing immigrants, replacing second person singular with third person plural. 

Remember, if you're explaining you're losing.

Monday, 19 December 2016

An interesting thought

There's this young girl that I know, thirteen, maybe fourteen. Highly intelligent and for her age very articulate. Although third or even fourth generation in the town where we both live she has to travel to another town, ten miles away for her secondary education. You see there's no room for her in the local school because hordes of cultural enrichers have needs too.

Although her current school developed an excellent reputation over many years it's experiencing problems aplenty in recent times. Its rapidly declining academic performance has coincided with the enrolment of large numbers of Africans. This girl freely tells me that the five Africans in her class are irredeemably stupid, make little effort to learn, are highly disruptive and require all kinds of remedial services (including full-time translators!).They loudly jabber away in their own lingua franca, ignore the teachers, and communicate via "clucking" (her word) noises. Leading the teacher to one day burst into tears and warn that the whole class might fail to graduate.

Anybody familiar with teaching blacks won't be in the least surprised by any of this. But here's my big takeaway: This girl (and I confirmed that most of her class felt the same way) had no problem seeing her black 'classmates' as very different, of lower intelligence, as a severe drag on the White students. And they have no inhibitions about saying so. Now this might just be a localised and short-term reaction, with grim acceptance and cognitive dissonance setting in as the kids get older. After all just about every institution of power (state, churches, educational establishment, media) forces them to point out the Emperor's fine clothes.

Or maybe they won't change. Maybe experiencing diversity at first hand, and its direct and tangible impact on their future prospects, will over-ride the unnatural constraints imposed on them. What would happen then?

Time will tell.  

Wednesday, 14 December 2016

Are you still laughing?

"The achievement, if I can call it that, of inducing the most successful race in the world, the creator of the most advanced civilisation ever seen, to turn on itself and willingly self-destruct by way of societal degradation and internecine warfare is simply awesome. So incredible that, even as an agnostic, I sometimes wonder whether some supernatural agency is not after all involved."

wrote that some time ago as I metaphorically scratched my head at the West's ongoing destruction. I also wondered why those who'd already been amply rewarded continued their destructive role into old age. For example why does Peter Sutherland (now in his seventies and apparently in ill-health) still work assiduously to flood Europe with millions of Muslims and Africans despite the ensuing catastrophe that's coming down the line? Why does he not sit back and enjoy the millions "earned" during his career, or better again make some effort to undo the evil he's wrought?

Maybe the architect of the long march through America's institutions (and mentor for, inter aliaHellery Rodent Clinton and Obama) can shed some light on the issue. (((Saul Alinsky))) in Rules For Radicals, his blueprint of destruction, wrote the following in his introduction to that book. "Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer."

Don't know about you, but I'm no longer laughing at the supernatural dimension.

Sunday, 11 December 2016

The Cyprus solution

The partition of the Island of Cyprus into ethnically distinct semi-states has been universally deplored. It's self evidently a Bad Thing, and this  explains the endless efforts  to undo it.   But I'd argue that the current two-state arrangement is far better than the "unified" country it replaced because the Greek and Turkish communities had never really lived together in peace and harmony. Relatively peaceful co-existence was maintained only by force (or the threat of force) first by the Ottomans, then by the British.

The Constitution implemented after independence attempted to paper over the fissures arising from two very distinct and mutually-hostile communities having to live together under a single polity. Predictably the resulting compromise was arcane, complex and highly unstable. Clauses geared towards countering crude majoritarian rule (4:1 Greek/Turkish ratio) ended up creating legislative gridlock from the highest levels down to the street level. According to one Constitutional scholar 'the Constitution of Cyprus stands alone among the constitutions of the world".

Not surprisingly the two communities were at one another's throats from the outset. Issues of contention included schooling, media control, taxation and the ability to create ethnically and religiously based municipalities. Such disputes were resolved by violence on the ground rather than by political means. The 'land of the sirens' came to represent something very different to that portrayed in Greek mythology. 

Eventually the attempt to reunite with Greece in 1974 precipitated a Turkish invasion and the de facto two-country solution we have today, with Turks in the North, Greeks in the South. Obviously the creation of this entity was accompanied by mass ethnic cleansing in both directions and involved much suffering and dispossession. But in due course Cyprus (i.e. the Greek part) became free, peaceful, prosperous and democratic. The inter-communal violence that scarred the island for centuries is no more. There are no more ethnic enclaves. Ordinary Cypriots are free to go wherever they want in peace.

The Turkish-ruled North has been nowhere as successful, suffering as it does from Islamic obscurantism, a large (and deeply-resented) influx of peasants from the Anatolian plains and a generally limited entrepreneurial culture. To add to their woes they've been enriched by large numbers of  fast-breeding Africans. This large-scale immigration might in time lead to the kind of communal strife commonplace when the island was 'united'. But for now both sides of the Green Line are mercifully free of this scourge.

All of this lends credence to the old adage 'high fences make good neighbours'. They really do. The experience also underlines the insuperable challenges that can arise when incompatible peoples occupy the same physical space. The corollary being that those now working to beset White peoples with such an abomination are traitors and should be treated as such.

Wednesday, 7 December 2016

The Austrian Presidential Election

Austria's women gave the Green Party Candidate an astonishing 62% of their vote in the recent Presidential election in Austria, over-riding the strong majority of men who voted for the Bad Nazi guy. This is a huge imbalance but should not come as a surprise because as a general rule men invade while women invite. All over the West it's mostly women who brandish the 'Refugees Welcome' signs. They also staff the reception centres and write anguished letters to their politicians. But why would they support an invasion of primitive misogynistic thieves and rapists? 

For a start women react more emotionally than do men. And it's here where the meme of The Boy On The Beach proved to be so powerful. A brilliantly-staged piece of propaganda, it reinforced the ongoing pictorial representation of the migrants as hapless women and children (notwithstanding that most of the invaders are aggressive young men). Women also have narrower spheres of interest and shorter conceptual time frames. So they'll subconsciously assess the invasion on what they perceive to be its more immediate impact on their own family and social circle, neglecting the broader and longer-term societal impact. This becomes more understandable given that men have largely determined the course of human history (exploration, warfare, scientific advancement etc.) while women acted as nurturers and home makers. You don't easily gainsay 10,000 years of evolution.

Some unique pathologies of today's Western world also exacerbate the problem. For instance White women have been conditioned to 'liberate' themselves from their evil patriarchal menfolk and demonstrate it by having few if any children. This has resulted in a huge cohort of older middle-class women with neither husbands nor children. The  distressed and helpless migrants can then serve as surrogates for otherwise stunted emotional outlets. And of course they also win a valuable virtue signalling resource, secure in the knowledge that Khaled the camel humper won't be moving into their gated communities. Not yet anyway.

I wonder should we rescind their right to vote?

Sunday, 4 December 2016

The man with a plan

A few weeks ago the inhabitants of the stony and wind-swept Aran Islands off Ireland's West coast got an unpleasant surprise. The operators of the ferry announced that they were withdrawing the service until the middle of next March. Panic ensued (if we were to believe some of the claims the islanders would in quick order be reduced to cannibalism) and after frantic intervention by the Government the company promised to maintain the operation until Christmas.

As the Government flailed around for potential solutions they ignored one staring them in the face: Using Ireland's Navy. But our boys in blue had more urgent work in hand - 'rescuing' migrants in the Mediterranean and transporting them to Europe. An article entitled Something Strange Is Taking Place In The Mediterranean says this about how such so-called rescues take place. "Human traffickers contact the Italian coast guard in advance to receive support and to pick up their dubious cargo. NGO ships [Irish Navy does the same] are directed to the “rescue spot” even as those to be rescued are still in Libya. The 15 ships that we observed are owned or leased by NGOs have regularly been seen to leave their Italian ports, head south, stop short of reaching the Libyan coast, pick up their human cargo, and take course back 260 miles to Italy even though the port of Zarzis in Tunis is just 60 mile away from the rescue spot."

The report has elicited outrage from almost all of the readers. But many repeat the infuriating fallacy that the invasion is due to stupidity on the part of Europe's leaders. But these people are not dumb, they're not stupid, and they're not stumbling into what will be a challenge of existential dimensions. No. The NWO globalists are fulfilling the plan drawn up by a man they honour with a prestigious prize every few years: Count Coudenhove-Kalergi, who said that 'the man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. ...'
To repeat, the flooding of Europe by Third World detritus has been carefully planned. It's supported, despite the occasional tactical retreats, by all of the Continent's political elite. If you doubt this just consider an alternative: Europe builds and staffs a number of 'reception centres' for those supposedly fleeing persecution, and locates them in the Middle East and North Africa. They could house them at a fraction of what it costs in Europe and - here's the great part - all those drownings that they seem so concerned about would immediately end. But they have not done that and they will not do it. Because that would up-scuttle their plan for White genocide.

Monday, 28 November 2016

Know thine enemy

The bed-wetting SJWs who rule our moral ecosystem get more out of touch by the day, cowering in safe rooms while clutching their pearls as they contemplate the horror of Donald and Brexit. And this will increasingly cost them. Got an example today listening to a harrowing radio report from an Irish holiday-camp-turned-asylum-seeker-accommodation.

Well the whole thrust of the report and the introductory comments were meant to be harrowing, all about unfortunate victims who were getting only an extra €20 per child for Christmas presents. One after another the victims relayed their frustration and disappointment with the Irish taxpayer. 'You know children, they want all the best things for Christmas. And with five children [this guy is from the Congo] I'll have less than €100 to spend between them'. He then went on to helpfully suggest that '€100 per child would be acceptable'.

I have no doubt that all concerned believed they had struck a mighty blow on behalf of the asylum tourists, that listeners all over the country were scrambling for their cheque-books in a feverish attempt to alleviate the suffering. But your wise Savant knew better. In fact anybody working in a normal job and trying to provide for a family knew better. And the reaction wasn't long coming. The presenter triumphantly reported that their switchboard 'lit up' after the report....... only to plaintively follow shortly afterwards with a plea for tolerance and understanding. And the subject was then dropped.

They had of course shot themselves in the foot with a howitzer. And such developments take place all over the world in ever greater numbers, from the highest levels (a la Trump) down to the mundane and quotidian. You see by closing down all opposing opinions and marginalising those who hold them they've made warfare's most fundamental error (and remember this is warfare): they no longer know their enemy.

So continue to occupy the High Moral Ground my luvvies while we get on with business.

Friday, 25 November 2016

A pleasant surprise

Here's the single objective that characterises every Irish Government: Don't ever make an unpopular decision. And if you do so by mistake or through some fleeting and ill-advised commitment to the long-term good immediately concede and withdraw. Above all never ever upset the chattering classes in the media or the 'international bodies' like the UN or the EU. Paddy must always be seen as a good World Citizen.  Understanding this helps explain why the streets of Ireland today resemble a cross between Karachi and Lagos.

So you can understand my surprise when I read this.

"For a country that once boasted the '100,000 welcomes' to visitors, Ireland has become the least welcoming country in western Europe for refugees. Latest figures from the EU agency, Eurostat, shows Ireland at the bottom of the league for accepting refugees. Ireland may also have the highest level of refusals for asylum seekers in the EU, turning down more than 90pc of those who arrived here seeking refuge, the figures show.

In the 12 months to the end of June this year, Ireland received less than 10pc of asylum applicants to similar-sized EU states. Denmark, with a population of 5.4m, accepted 21,000 asylum applicants; Norway, with a population of 5m, accepted 28,000 applicants. Ireland is recorded by Eurostat as receiving only 2,780 applicants during the 12-month period to June this year.

Figures from the Department of Justice revealed that of a total of 1,552 applications for asylum to the Office of Refugee Applications Commissioner (ORAC) in 2015, only 9.8pc were granted leave to remain. The Department of Justice is also steadily closing down appeal avenues for asylum seekers, increasingly preventing them from seeking judicial reviews of their refusals, sources say."

The report goes on to say that "new systems which are being put in place are making the process of applying for refugee status, and of appealing rejection, harder and harder." As a consequence "asylum seekers are now believed to be avoiding Ireland". 

And it gets better. "Ireland would also appear to be, statistically, ahead of other EU countries when it comes to deporting illegal aliens. Last year the State deported 3,500 people with the figure for this year expected to increase to around 4,000, about double the 2012 figure for deportations, according to figures supplied to the Dail by Justice Minister Frances Fitzgerald."

I must confess to being extremely surprised - and impressed - by this.  By way of explanation I remember Rob McCarthy, a regular reader of this blog, pointing out some time ago that dedicated and patriotic civil servants were countering on the ground much of the damage caused by spineless politicians and traitors like (((Alan Shatter))). It looks like he might be right and could explain why an asylum centre in my town has been gradually emptied over the last few years. Maybe there is hope. However I should add that the correct rejection figure would be 100%. Because anyone fetching up here and claiming asylum must have travelled through other countries to get here. Ipso facto that makes them asylum tourists.

I close with a heart-warming story of two groups of 'vulnerable' parasites squabbling over taxpayer largess and celebrate the ensuing anguish of the SJWs as they grapple with the vagaries of the Victimhood Hierarchy.  A group of Irish travellers/knackers/gypsies protested at the allocation of a public housing unit to a family of Syrian asylum tourists. Interestingly the comments for the article were closed off with an hour of its appearance.

Tuesday, 22 November 2016

That didn't take long

During his eight-year reign Obama added more to America's national debt than all the other Presidents before him combined. Incredible but true. When he ascended the throne the debt stood at $10.9 trillion and in a spending frenzy that conjures up Caligula he doubled it in eight years to over $20 trillion. And strangely enough neither the (((Federal Reserve Board))) nor mainstream economists had much to say about it. To the extent they did get involved it was only to assure us that deficits would be offset by the ensuing stimulation. Eventually.

Strangely enough, just as Trump takes office, it seems the great and the good have become very worried about Government expenditure. (((Paul Krugman))) the doyen of talking head economists (and Nobel Laureate) as recently as last August was writing about The Folly of Prudence.  But that was when the Hildebeaste looked a shoo-in for the Presidency. Now that the beast has returned to its lair Krugman has suddenly donned the hair shirt and professes himself to be worried about the national debt and 'the quality of Trump's spending'. Many others have adopted a similar line, including former head of the Central Bank of  Israel (and now Fed Vice-Chairman) Stanley Fischer. Whatever he does or says I know Stanley will always have the interests of the American people uppermost in his mind.

But back to the Emperor and his doubling of the debt. The following chart uses a disarmingly simple technique to underline the gravity of the situation Trump has inherited. 

United States Tax Revenues: $2,170,000,000,000

· Federal Budget: $3,820,000,000,000

· New Debt: $1,650,000,000,000

· National Debt: $14,271,000,000,000

Now, remove 8 zeros and pretend it’s a household budget.

· Annual Family Income: $21,700

· Money the Family Spent: $38,200

· New Debt on Credit Card: $16,500

· Outstanding Balance on Credit Card: $142,710

What cannot last will not last. But who'll be left standing when the music stops? I can make a fair guess as to who will not be left standing.

Saturday, 19 November 2016

The ticking anti-Semitic timebomb

"Jews have been the targets of an enduring, widespread, and volcanic animosity, the world’s all-time leading prejudice. Why are people around the world — this is especially relevant to Europeans — so susceptible to antisemitism?" Why indeed. Well if like me you're interested in finding the answer you wont't find it in the canonical work of Daniel Jonah Goldhagen who has built a lucrative career churning out book after book on this very subject. And you won't find it either from any of the other Jewish 'experts' in this field, all of whom metaphorically throw their hands in the air at the goyim's inexplicable perversity. Well actually they do offer some explanations, but 'mental derangement' and/or 'demonic posession' (Goldhagen) are unlikely to convince the impartial observer.

I've studied the history of numerous pogroms (inter-communal violence would often be a more accurate description) and it seems that anti-Semitism arose mainly as a reaction to strong Jewish ethnocentric behaviour and their acting as middle-men and usurers rather than producers. While irritating enough to elicit a backlash (often violent) from the goyim these contributors are minimal compared to the potential backlash to which Organised Jewry has exposed the Jewish people in more recent times.

Imagine if the general public became aware of the pivotal Jewish role in fomenting both World Wars, Bolshevism (including its financing), the 9/11 attacks, various wars in the Middle East and the destruction of White lands through mass Third World immigration (and this is a far from exhaustive catalogue). Can you imagine what would happen were this to become general knowledge? 

And why should this happen now given that it's slid under the radar so far? Back to Goldhagen: "The Internet in particular is available to everyone all the time anywhere, with the power of fuelling and sustaining prejudice that is vast, new, in this respect revolutionary, and continuing only to increase in scope and intensity.” Oy vey!  There can be no doubt that the truth is beginning to seep out just as he fears. This despite the Jewish monopoly of the most popular Internet and media platforms and a plethora of "hate" laws to foreclose discussion. 

Hard to predict the outcome. Suffice to say the goyim have a lot more to complain about today than they ever had in the past.

[One caveat: Most Jews will be unaware - or just dimly aware - of their leaders' machinations and the danger to which they have as a result been exposed.]

Monday, 14 November 2016

Anatomy of a deplorable

Have you noticed how the media and related 'experts', having totally and utterly failed in their pre-election analysis, are now, after a short period of reflection, returning to explain to us why Trump won and to issue us with instructions for taking things forward.  Silly me, I had assumed the first, last, and only thing they'd say would be: "Please, for the love of Christ, don't ever listen to us again." Naturally their post hoc attempts at rationalisation founder on their fundamental misunderstanding of what shaped the typical White male Trump voter. 

Now in his sixties, his first experience of "White privilege" would have been at school. A school not of his parents' choice, rather one dictated by the needs of diversity. Here he tried to gain an education while surrounded by low-intelligence, undisciplined and unteachable minorities. Here he came to understand that despite his people never owning slaves he owed - big time - people who themselves never were slaves. Throughout his schooling his confidence is systematically undermined by a media which massively over-represents blacks, representing them as cool, intelligent and sensitive while White males such as he get relentlessly mocked, denigrated and guilt-tripped. He sees every form of sexual degeneracy put on a pedestal while every tradition he held dear, even his flag, gets forced out of the public sphere.

Despite high SAT scores he's unable to gain entry to a good university - the kind of place founded by his antecedents for the likes of him. It pains him to see his place taken by unqualified minorities and to learn that most of the 'white' faculty and students he sees are in fact Jewish. Rejected, he takes a job in the private sector. Intelligent and industrious, he expected to make swift progress but instead found himself overlooked time and again as worthless minorities get promoted ahead of him. In due course he loses his job to a H1B Visa holder, whom he had first to first train in in order to qualify for the meagre severance package.

Ever resourceful, reflecting the stock that built the country, he sets up his own business, a business which thrives despite draconian EEOC (Eventual Elimination Of Competence) requirements which force him to employ an array of unproductive minority parasites. Meanwhile he walks on eggshells, fearful of bankrupting himself through offending them by way of some stray innocuous remark. Eventually he saves enough to buy a nice house in a nice suburb. The suburb is nice because it's almost 100% White....the only exception being a black guy down the road with his $200k p.a. Government Diversity Manager's job.

But this idyll doesn't last long as an invading army of Section 8 welfare bums soon swarms in. As he watches baby mammas and their bastard spawn destroy what had been his he reflects that his taxes and those of his neighbours finance this destruction. He wonders what will become of his family. He has no doubt as to the result of a divorce - he will, even if at no fault at all, lose half of whatever he owns and will incur discriminatory access to his children.

And his children, what is to become of them? Will there be another fifty years of litigation, marches, riots, white flight, reparations, affirmative action, section eight sprawl, diversity training, Whiteness Studies and other forms of anti-White brainwashing, midnight basketball, more portrayals of blacks as geniuses in the media while his boys are manhandled down the economic and social drain? Probably more than possibly.  So his anger builds. And the anger turns to implacable rage as the pension fund he laboured to build gets progressively looted by the untouchable criminals of Wall Street.

So now presstitutes, welcome to your average Trump voter. I just hope you traitors and your ilk can feel the hot breath of the impending White Uprising on their necks.

Friday, 11 November 2016

A terrible choice, a grim portent

In common with many Trump supporters on the alt-right I've long harboured a horrible doubt that - just maybe - he was a huckster using his marketing genius to tap into the zeitgeist, leveraging it to close the ultimate sale. Did he really plan to get on with Russia, de-fund NATO, pull American troops out of the Middle East (i.e. stop fighting wars for Israel) and instead focus attention and resources on domestic issues? If that represented his true beliefs then he literally could not have made a worse choice for National Security Adviser.

Former CIA Director James Woolsey recognised early in his career the boundless opportunities open to an energetic shabbos goy. Shamelessly throwing in his lot with the Israeli-Jewish power structure he became rich and powerful despite (or by way of) being mired in corruption and conflict of interest at every stage.

And he repaid his benefactors in full, enthusiastically supporting the slaughter and destruction in Iraq, Libya, Lebanon and Syria. On cue he's now agitating for war with Iran and for taking a 'tough stance' with Russia. He endlessly proclaims Israel to be "America's greatest friend and ally". His pandering on occasion has even embarrassed many American Jews, such as when he claimed that spy Jonathan Pollard was in jail only because of his Jewishness.

He's the Neocon's Neocon and Trump's stated position is not compatible with his. Someone will have to concede. I'm not optimistic.

Thursday, 10 November 2016

Rioting for peace and democracy

From all sides they came. They marched, they chanted. Their placards said it all.







And then they put the signs down and proceeded to smash windows, torch buildings and cars, attack police, beat up passing White men and call for Trump's death. Isn't it great to be an anti-Fascist?

Wednesday, 9 November 2016

He did it!

"Thank you, thank you all. Now this is  not the time for reconciliation and graciousness. This is a time to kick ass, to root out the traitorous degenerate globalist cabal that has dispossessed the real Americans and to send the millions of illegal invaders back to where they came from."

Tuesday, 8 November 2016

Trump or C*nt, the illegals stay

If Trump wins the vote - and is permitted by the Permanent Government to take office - will he activate his promise to 'deport the illegals'?  No. Even in the unlikely event that he does try he has in fact no chance of succeeding. Look at it this way. Southern California has been demographically taken over by Hispanics and this, inter alia, has seen Whites ethnically cleansed from most police forces through affirmative action and tribal machinations. In the event of a clampdown on illegals by the hated Trump we can reasonably assume that such police departments will not enforce expulsion measures. In fact many will actively stymie them (an easy thing to do).

So what then? Start with the relatively small numbers of illegals in northern states? That would work, but only for a short while as the targets would soon flee to the safety of the barrios and Sanctuary Cities in the South West. This in turn would further distort the regional ethnic balance and copper-fasten ethnic solidarity. Now add into the mix the profusion of Hispanic gangs with hundreds of thousands of ruthless battle-hardened 'soldiers' operating in every city and town in the region. There's ample historical evidence to show how criminal gangs can segue into para-political organisations (and vice versa of course). And in the event of a showdown we can expect large numbers of Latino 'activists' to stream across the now defunct border, discreetly aided by the Mexican Government.

Pity the poor ICE agents who enter a barrio under such circumstances, assuming in the first place that this increasingly corrupt and Hispanicised (but I repeat myself) agency has the will to do so. So what does Trump do then? Send in the Army? No, this is banned by the Constitution - remember that? The other alternative is the National Guard. Even though strenuous efforts are ongoing to 'diversify' this organisation it remains largely White. But don't expect these part-time soldiers to engage in casa-to-casa fighting in the barrios against vicious and well-armed paramilitaries just itching to have a go at the hated gringo federales.

It's not going to happen. Demography is destiny and Hispanics (legal and illegal) have 'done a Kosovo' in that they've out-bred the natives and now demand control if not full independence for 'their' regions. The USA has lost control of a large swathe of its territory (not just SOCAL-  a similar dispensation applies all the way along the border, as far as Corpus Christi in Texas) and, short of a military coup, it won't get it back.

Let's not be too surprised. Such dispossession has occurred throughout history. That's how the USA got Texas. The brave men of the Alamo were Mexican citizens who rebelled against their government because their people were now the majority in the land. But there's one big difference between what's happening today and what took place in 1835: The leaders of the United States then supported their own kin. Today they support the Hispanic invaders. 

No, Trump or C*nt, the South-West is lost. It has been for some time.

Saturday, 5 November 2016

The enemies within

The full extent of Huma Abedin's links with extreme Islam have become apparent to me only by way of the recent wikileaks revelations. How someone with a background like hers could become the probable next President's closest advisor beggars belief. But maybe it shouldn't. After all a half-Kenyan Muslim sympathiser currently occupies that very position. In fact wherever you look power is wielded by a motley collection of blacks, dual-citizen Israelis, Hispanics, fact the only cohort in short supply seems to be the founding stock of the nation.

Although referring to Abedin, this guy brilliantly skewers those other usurpers as well. "Completely indifferent to the struggles of the Historic American Nation. Just a wicked, black-eyed, soulless political climber who happens to be one of the most powerful advisors in the world. Do you think she has the interests of the farmer in Kansas foremost in her mind? Does she get a patriotic rush when poring over America’s storied history or take pride upon hearing a a perfect pitch rendition of the Star-Spangled Banner? Is there any doubt that every thought that crosses her mind in relation to the American people is overtly hostile? She is the portrait of a globalized, hostile elite, the modern arch-cosmopolitan. Unelected, unaccountable, and completely alien to the people of the nation she “represents”.

The last sentence is particularly apposite: These people are for the most part un-elected and unaccountable. I'm referring to the likes of Lynch, Holder, Yellen, Fischer, the SCOTUS judges, all of whom wield far more power than the elected so-called representatives of the majority. How have things come to such a sorry pass? Maybe this guy can help.

In any event America now stands at the edge of the demographic abyss. If Hellery, that corrupt, psychopathic, murdering lesbian and her menageries of minorities win the White House the country will within thirty years resemble Brazil or Mexico today.

Wednesday, 2 November 2016

The sad death of "hard news"

Joyous tidings this week as Reuters announce the layoff of 2,000 staff from their world-wide operations. This follows earlier layoffs of 5,500  in 2013 and further underlines the implosion of the mainstream media brainwashing machine. Readership, advertising revenue and most of all reputation spiral downwards as readers flee to alternative sources.

This trend worries the "liberal" (and partially Soros-funded) Brookings Institution which notes that while radio and television (print news is finished) remain important, listener and viewer numbers have also "declined precipitously". And it seems that even "hard news" is now in danger" (stop laughing at the back!). "These trends have left many people wondering who will collect hard news for the general public. While the Internet world has made it possible for everyone to express their opinion widely — whether they know anything or not — it has also confused readers." Isn't that terrible!  The confusion stems apparently from the absence of "neutral intermediaries such as reporters, fact-checkers, and editors". And that means "readers are having a hard time judging the credibility of what they read." 

It's bad. Because without the forensic skills of the intrepid MSM sleuths who will we have to dig out the hard news on Obama's academic and birth records, to find out that "a Swedish man" was killed while fighting with ISIS in Syria, to detail the orgy of rape and pillage committed by Europe's 'migrants, to show the Clinton Foundation to be a criminal enterprise along the lines of the Mafia?  Though various factors are contributing to the MSM's demise, the biggest one will be loss of credibility. Americans’ trust and confidence in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly has dropped to its lowest level in Gallup polling history.  And their grotesque (mis)handling of the Trump/Clinton election will represent the coup-de-grace for whatever credibility remains.

Happy days, but the battle is far from won. Our enemies remain active on the alternative front, controlling the various electronic communications oversight bodies while enjoying a virtual stranglehold on social media and other alternative platforms. Armies of hasbaras and bots are working feverishly even as we speak in the battle against Thought Crime. But this new environment is difficult to control. For every impediment put in our way one of us will come up with a counter-measure. The battle will be fierce and unrelenting.

Continue to fight the good fight.

Sunday, 30 October 2016

I offer my help to Old Nick

Whatever else Ireland is short of it's not preening self-appointed Moral Crusaders. Among them St. Bob Geldof, Bono and of course the nodding lizard itself Mary Robinson, former President and Head of the UN Human Rights Commission (a body of which a key department is headed by none other than Saudi Arabia). Despite her endless demands of taxpayers to open their pockets to 'the most vulnerable' she has, in common with just about every other Moral Authority, demonstrated an uncanny ability to keep her own pockets firmly closed. Unless the moolah is going the other direction. 

Despite being the beneficiary of three gold-plated index-linked pensions (Trinity College, Irish State and the UN) she's now come up with another wheeze: To donate her papers to a dedicated Presidential Library in the bleak windswept backwater of North Mayo. She has emphasised that she's donating said papers, not getting a brass cent for them. Although it seems she has negotiated a tax credit for them worth more than €1 million. You must understand that this is totally different to actually charging the State €1 million. I admit that the distinction eludes me. But if the MSM say it's so.....well that's good enough for me. And she's even been good enough to scout out a building for the Library, a run-down tenement which just happens to be owned by her brother and for which the citizens of Mayo are to pay treble its market value.

Noam Chomsky, whom she greatly admires, would be proud of her.

But let our minds wander to the plight of Nick, her unfortunate husband, and specifically to what it must have been like for him to try and get his leg over this basilisk. An experience which approximates to that of the male black widow spider. This creature literally faces an existential dilemma. Driven by the two most elemental instincts in nature (procreation and survival) he warily circles the object of his desire, acutely aware that one false move and she'll literally have him for dinner. Now think of Old Nick, eyeing up his ice-cold, reptilian, humanoid spouse, her gimlet eyes boring through him as he shivers before the freezing force-field that shields her from human contact. 

With this dilemma in mind I offer her the use of the following eForm (free of charge, although I wouldn't mind f he could swing a tax credit) to help love find a way. 


Proposed date and time (dd/mm/yy, 24 hour clock format)

Planned duration (not to exceed 15 minutes)

   Procreation []
   Gratification []
   Urgent release of testosterone buildup []

Details of required services
   Missionary position []
   Doggy-style []
   Oral []
   Other (please specify)


Mary Robinson, President and Chairperson of UNHCR

Thursday, 27 October 2016

Those who will not be voting for Trump

In the current issue of the London Review Of Books Elliot Weissberger (I know, I know) provides us with a catalogue of 'those who will not be voting for Trump'. 


African Americans and Jews
‘Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are little short guys that wear yarmulkes every day.’

Also listed are the Bush (Crime) Family and the Neocons, inclusions which Weissberger somehow regards as reflecting negatively on Trump. Anyway, it's an interesting concept and in my legendary helpful way I now add a few more to his catalogue.

Corrupt time-serving politicians
Trump will introduce a constitutional amendment to place term limits on all members of Congress and a 5 year-ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government service.

AIPAC and its support constellation
"I will implement a complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections." 

“We will no longer surrender this country or its people to the false song of globalism. The nation-state remains the true foundation of happiness and harmony.”

"First I will announce my intention to renegotiate NAFTA or withdraw from the deal under Article 2205. Second I will announce our withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership." 

Education debasers
Trump's programme 'redirects education dollars to gives parents the right to send their kid to the public, private, charter, magnet, religious or home school of their choice, ends Common Core and brings education supervision to local communities.'

Trump's programme will cancel all federal funding to Sanctuary Cities, begin removing the more than 2 million criminal illegal immigrants from the country and cancel visas to foreign countries that won’t take them back. 

Global Warming hucksters 
‘This very expensive GLOBAL WARMING bullshit has got to stop. Our planet is freezing, record low temps, and our GW scientists are stuck in ice. I will cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate change programs and use the money to fix America’s water and environmental infrastructure.'

You're welcome, (((Elliot))).

Sunday, 23 October 2016

Tell The Truth And Shame The Devil

The brilliant book The Myth Of German Villainy has been much commented on this blog and covered extensively over at katana. I've now just finished an even more dramatic work which explains how behind the scenes, events are controlled by a coterie of ethnic puppet-masters who work their marionettes in high places out of public view. How did this world get to the dark place it is today? Who could have stopped it and what can we now? Given that the author is the son of legendary violinist Yehudi Menuhin and the latest in a long line of rabbis those whom he identifies as 'the coterie of ethnic puppet-masters' will surprise you.

'The book consists of three sections. The first concerns Adolf Hitler, and the real causes leading up to the outbreak of WWII.  The second section enlarges on the activities of the real culprits, provides a historical overview of their progress, their nature, their power over finance and the media, and the methods by which they achieved it. The third concerns the two World Wars, their conception, funding and inescapable continuity; our current laws against freedom of expression, and the evolution of the Orwellian state.'

Not surprisingly the author has suffered greatly for his honesty, losing his job at the Menuhin Foundation and suffering expulsion from polite society. But he fearlessly persists. He is, as a German nationalist writer described him, 'a noble Jew'. And on this point let us spare a thought for the other Jews out there who have taken on their tribe in the pursuit of the truth. There are a lot more of them than you might think. 

Of them I echo Hitler's observation to his family doctor Eduard Bloch. 'If enough Jews were like you there would be no anti-Semitism'.

Please buy this book, read it and proselytise.

Coda: Flanders, one of our top commentators, has sent this link regarding the current terrible situation in Germany, by an author whose German lineage goes back 500 years. Please check it out.

Wednesday, 19 October 2016

Why Syria is being destroyed

The Pipeline Theory is the prevailing explanation for the current destruction of Syria. The theory goes like this: The Saudis and Qataris want to run a gas pipeline to Europe to gain extra market share and to put one over on Putin. The Assad regime refuses to give them right of way, hence he has to go. And if that means the destruction of the country and the deaths of up to a million people, well, too bad.  I never bought into this, not least because they don't need to go through Syria. They could go through Iraq instead. 

Call me a cynic but when the USA starts blowing up Israel's (cough) neighbours my thoughts turn to the Yinon Plan, not pipelines. Lo and behold, confirmation comes via a recent release from Wikileaks of an email between Hildebeaste Clinton and some other State Dept. criminal.

The best way to help Israel deal with Iran's growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria [yeah, right] overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad. Negotiations to limit Iran's nuclear program will not solve Israel's security dilemma. Nor will they stop Iran from improving the crucial part of any nuclear weapons program — the capability to enrich uranium. At best, the talks between the world's major powers and Iran that began in Istanbul this April and will continue in Baghdad in May will enable Israel to postpone by a few months a decision whether to launch an attack on Iran that could provoke a major Mideast war. 

Iran's nuclear program and Syria's civil war may seem unconnected, but they are (sic). For Israeli leaders, the real threat from a nuclear-armed Iran is not the prospect of an insane Iranian leader launching an unprovoked Iranian nuclear attack on Israel that would lead to the annihilation of both countries. What Israeli military leaders really worry about -- but cannot talk about -- is losing their nuclear monopoly. An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. 

The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today. If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself. Back to Syria. It is the strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel's security — not through a direct attack, which in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel has never occurred, but through its proxies in Lebanon, like Hezbollah, that are sustained, armed and trained by Iran via Syria. The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel's leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests. 

Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel's security, it would also ease Israel's understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted. Right now, it is the combination of Iran's strategic alliance with Syria and the steady progress in Iran's nuclear enrichment program that has led Israeli leaders to contemplate a surprise attack — if necessary over the objections of Washington. With Assad gone, and Iran no longer able to threaten Israel through its, proxies, it is possible that the United States and Israel can agree on red lines for when Iran's program has crossed an unacceptable threshold. 

The United States Government is ZOG. Totally owned by a foreign power.

Saturday, 15 October 2016

Trump skirts the Third Rail

Gladdening the hearts of those of us who feared he had taken the Blue Pill, Trump let rip thusly at a packed meeting in Florida a few days ago.

This is not simply another four-year election, This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we, the people, reclaim control over our government. The political establishment that is trying to stop us is the same group responsible for our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration, and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry. 

This election will determine whether we remain a free country in the truest sense of the word or we become a corrupt banana republic controlled by large donors and foreign governments. Our corrupt political establishment, that is the greatest power behind the efforts at radical globalization and the disenfranchisement of working people. Their financial resources are virtually unlimited, their political resources are unlimited, their media resources are unmatched.

If ever there was a dog-whistle this was it. And the limp-wristed faggots  in the media took the bait. Here's Mother Jones: Many internet users were alarmed at Trump’s language, noting its reliance on anti-Semitic themes and more suited to a fascist dictator than a presidential candidate. Throughout the speech, Trump used harsh language that evoked old and ugly anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about international bankers who supposedly infiltrate national governments and control the global agenda.

What a crazy idea, international bankers who supposedly infiltrate national governments and control the global agenda! But here's a logical response from (((Jonathan Taylor))) on Counterpunch. By making this association, these supposed defenders of the Jews are in fact the ones at risk of fostering anti-Semitism. If “globalists” are conflated with Jews by Jews, then doesn’t that means that globalists ARE Jews? If “international bankers” is a cover for anti-Semitism, than by simple deduction most international bankers must be Jewish! Bringing up anti-Semitism then just reminds people of how much influence and power Jews have. Casually hurling charges of anti-Semitism at critics of globalism is incredibly ill-advised and unhelpful.

Which is why I welcome it! More please. As Chateau Heartiste commentator Matt King observes They can’t snuff us out without a trace now that Trump has “taken the slings and arrows” on our behalf. The paper tiger of the left has been exposed. They cannot intimidate or credibly threaten us anymore. Trump had more to lose than perhaps any of us, and he pushed it all to the center of the table, showing us the way it will be done in the second revolutionary era.

Imagine if we were really about to see the advent of a new and truly revolutionary epoch?

Wednesday, 12 October 2016

"First they came for the straight White men......"

The London Independent  tells us that 'a BBC presenter has condemned the broadcaster’s diversity strategy and claimed he was dismissed from his role for being a “white man”. Jon Holmes, a Bafta-winning writer and comedian who has appeared on Radio 4’s The Now Show for 18 years, claimed bosses let him go after informing him the show was being recast with “more women and diversity”.

In the finest traditions of a Stalinist Show Trial Holmes prefaced his complaint with the following disclaimer:  "I totally understand and agree with ....harder quotas and diversity targets.  Diversity is important. Of course it is. We know it is. That's beyond argument.  But maybe it's time to open up the debate - and, in all honesty, not just because I'm on the receiving end.” Oh ho ho ho Jonny boy. Being on the receiving end is the one and only reason you're belatedly calling for a debate. Whereas I'm not familiar with your work my assumption is that during your current affairs comedy career at the HebeBC you never once called for such a debate. Because had you done so you'd have been out on your ear pronto.

'If we are now openly giving jobs to people based on the colour of their skin, surely that is only emphasising just the kind of social division that the equality that I was brought up to embrace strives to eliminate?  So what if – and I know this is radical – but what if everything and every job in all walks of life was open to everyone equally, and we all just agree that everyone's the same, by which I mean – you know – 'human'?'

Now tell me something Jon. Early in your article (the part where you paraded your PC credentials) you professed yourself in favour of  'harder quotas and diversity targets'. Any chance you'd reconcile this with your wish that 'everything and every job ..... was open to everyone equally, and we all just agree that everyone's the same, by which I mean – you know – 'human'?  You can't, can you? And that's because the two concepts are mutually irreconcilable. You can have diversity quotas - or - you can have appointments based on merit.  It's one or the other. And it's a zero-sum game.

So welcome to the world of the straight White male. Despite what you hear about White Privilege it's not an easy world to live in. In contrast to every other demographic you'll find yourself mocked, abused and ridiculed with impunity. But you know that, don't you? After all you've been doing it yourself for the last 18 years at the Beeb.  And as you search for that new job you'll find to your horror that you're on the lowest rung of the ladder. The top rung - in the country your forbears built - will be occupied by a black transgendered Muslim or some such. 

It's tough. So I'll conclude with a word of advice. Be very careful with all this talk about a 'debate on diversity'. The people who now enforce the law in what was your country might deem such talk to be 'hate crime'. By the way, have you ever heard of the Alt-Right?

Saturday, 8 October 2016

Jewish Boy Privilege: A poem

You surely have come across by now the poem 'White Boy Privilege' by 14 year-old (((Royce Mann))) delivered at his $22,000 a year private school in Atlanta. If not you can get a transcript here. (I recommend the transcript as the actual video will surely induce an attack of projectile vomiting.) Anyway it's come to my attention that little Royce now plans a more narrowly-focused follow-up entitled 'Jew Boy Privilege'. The following is a sneak preview of the first draft.

Dear White people. I'm  sorry for what we did to you. Capitalised on your good nature to surreptitiously steal your country from under you....the institutions and wealth bequeathed to you by your forebears. I'm sorry that we used that power and wealth to turn it into a degenerate hell hole by debasing and corrupting education, entertainment, banking and politics, flooding it with Third World detritus, diverting your blood and treasure to fight my country's wars in the Middle East, for robbing your advanced military technology and selling it to your enemies.

Dear women, I’m sorry that we have transformed you from first rate women into second-rate men, for turning you against your White male kin, for convincing you to abjure your nature by not having families (and for killing your babies should you get pregnant), for  tricking you into believing your 'career' would compensate, and for your inevitable future as barren embittered and lonely cat-ladies.

Dear black people, I’m sorry that my ancestors brought your ancestors over here as slaves in their ships and for maintaining that slave status to this day by reducing you to welfare parasites dependent on productive Whites for your very existence.

I say now that I would change places with you in an instant, but if given the opportunity, would I?

Probably not.   Because to be honest, being privileged is awesome. You see our ethnic network ensures that I'm privileged at every stage of my life while simultaneously enabling me to claim victim status as and when required! How good is that? And should some goy point out the scam we'll destroy him with our time-worn catch-cries of anti-Semitism,  The Holocau$t™ and Hitler.

So White boys, keep acting like women.....White girls, keep acting like men. And become atomised, rootless, androgynous and dumbed down peons. You'll be happy.  Trust me.

Thursday, 6 October 2016

Contrasting tales of tails wagging dogs

Like many others on this blog (and hopefully many more to come) I'm reading The Myth Of German Villainy by Benton Bradberry. As an aside the book reminded me again of the contrasting reactions in Russia and Hungary to their respective Bolshevik takeovers at the end of the Great War. In both countries the Bolshevik leaders were almost entirely Jewish and/or foreign, proportionally their numbers were minuscule, yet they still managed to forcefully subdue the native populations.

Soon after seizing power they unleashed the Red Terror in both countries and worked to destroy everything about their culture and heritage. Not exactly a popularity winning programme! In Russia they were entirely successful while in Hungary their rule lasted only about 100 days. Admittedly the Hungarian people  received significant military assistance from Roumania but it's almost certain that they would have done the job themselves in quick measure anyway.  Germans did an even faster job of liquidating their own Soviets in Bavaria and Berlin.

So how could the Russian people allow a minuscule band of non-Russians take over their enormous country which then suffered hitherto unimaginable levels of bloodshed and destruction? Part of the explanation lies in the Bolsheviks initially stabilising their power by meeting populist demands such as land distribution, worker ownership and of course ending Russia's role in the Great War. While it might be argued that for instance the British and Spanish Empires also took control of vast regions with relatively tiny resources there is a fundamental difference: In their cases the fighting was done by the British and Spanish themselves, albeit with the aid of some natives hostile to the dominant tribes. The natives were directly conquered after military defeat by militarily superior invaders.

But had the Russian people united against their Bolshevik oppressors the latter's end would surely have been swift. Instead there was "a weary capitulation without any spirit, helplessly, with a sense of doom” as Solzhenitsyn described it. Even the powerful Red Army stood by as its office corps was systematically wiped out over a period of a few years. 

Are the Russians of today a different breed? I sure hope so as it could be that they're the White race's only hope.

Coda: A majority of the Bolshevik nomenklatura changed their Jewish names to Russian-sounding alternatives. This surely had a significant impact on the public perception of their project, disguising its essentially Jewish nature. It still goes on to this day, as Jon Liebowitz Stewart knows.

Monday, 3 October 2016

The blessed life of a Moral Crusader

Being a Moral Crusader is a great gig in that you get the best of all worlds, public acclaim and a luxurious lifestyle just for self-righteously calling on others to meet the moral standards that you define. Enter Noam Chomsky who according to Wikipedia "in his youth developed a dislike of capitalism (a "grotesque catastrophe") and the selfish pursuit of material advancement". He laments the increasing inequality resulting from the gutting of finance industry regulation and warns of an "unaccountable and deadly rule by corporations."  But amazingly he's managed to become a highly successful capitalist himself, making millions of dollars through adroit management of Brand Chomsky.

Books represent his biggest earner by far. He churns them out on an industrial scale (they're largely rehashes of earlier speeches and articles) and charges a hefty capitalist price for them.  As he does for his speeches.  If you want him  to deliver The  Selfish Pursuit Of Material Advancement - one of his favourite lectures - your university will first have to fork out for the $15,000 fee plus the cost of First Class travel and a five star hotel that this horny-handed son of the soil insists on.  And should you want to download material from his web site you'll be met with this stern warning: "Material on this site is copyrighted by Noam Chomsky and/or Noam Chomsky and his collaborators. No material on this site may be reprinted or posted on other web sites without written permission." Such permission being granted on payment of a hefty fee.

And what about this: Following the 9/11 attacks he discovered that the demand for his learned opinion had, well, exploded. Despite his intense dislike of the "grotesque catastrophe of capitalism" he immediately jacked up his speaking fees by 30%.  Don't you just love that?  And within weeks he'd churned out another book to exploit the disaster, this one purporting to explain its causes and significance. However on closer inspection (after you'd forked out your $40) you'd have learned that it was - yet again - made up of already published material spliced together with some hastily-written linkage text.

At a speech in Philadelphia entitled "Noam Chomsky: Media and Democracy" he told the audience that "a democracy requires a free, independent, and inquiring media." After the speech left-wing 'journalist' Deborah Bolling tried to get an interview with him. No problem...if the "free, independent, and inquiring" reporter first forked out $35 for the privilege!  Clearly he didn't have the likes of her in mind when he wrote "The responsibility of the writer as a moral agent is to bring the truth about matters of human significance to an audience that can do something about them."

And wouldn't you expect him to invest the resultant fortune in a blind trust or better again in green eco-friendly stocks? Maybe, but unfortunately such companies offer poor returns and high risk. Unlike those for example in the military-industrial complex, Big Pharma or the oil companies. But that's not an option given that he sees them as exemplifying the "grotesque catastrophe" of predatory capitalism. Oh wait - one quick intellectual somersault later and he's plunged headlong into their stocks, greatly enriching himself in the process.

And now he strides the intellectual firmament like a colossus, wealthy, feted, admired, a sought-after guest while remaining a champion of the poor and a defender of the environment. The long and happy life of a Moral Crusader. 

(More good stuff on Noam here).