Friday, 29 December 2017

Give Boot the boot

Have you ever been struck by the way some 'experts' retain their reputation despite being spectacularly wrong on just about everything? People like Paul Ehrlich (are we about to freeze or burn to death Paul?). Max Boot, the 'conservative foreign policy expert', is another one. Every forecast he's made proved catastrophically wrong (Iran was supposed to have nuked Israel by 2015) as has every one of his policy recommendations. He proclaimed that American military intervention against Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria would transform these countries - with minimal casualties or destruction - into liberal freedom-loving pro-Western democracies. 


Yet instead of being on trial for war crimes he remains a key member of the immensely powerful Council On Foreign Relations while his 'expertise' is eagerly sought by the MSM - a platform he uses to fan the flames of new American wars - this time against Russia and Iran. And now he's created another flurry by suddenly discovering that he's the beneficiary of White Privilege, a somersault that has been eviscerated by left-wing feminist (!) Caitlin Johnstone. "Max Boot is courting Democrats because his war-hungry ideology is being increasingly rejected by Republicans" and Trump in particular who's not bellicose enough for this particular armchair warrior.

Unfortunately most of Libtardia is clucking and cooing at a prominent 'conservative' figure seeing the light. But Boot (or should that be Bootski or Bootov?) is not now and never has been a  conservative. No more than he is now a liberal. As with all the Jewish Neoconservatives (but I repeat myself) his migrations between liberalism and conservatism stem from the perception of what's good for the Jews, specifically for Israel. The destruction and slaughter inflicted on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria were never about American interests but about weakening Israel's regional enemies. And that's why he's now beating the drums for war against Iran and its Russian allies.

It speaks volumes for the power of ZOG that this Russian Jew with such a calamitous record remains ensconced at the epicentre of the American foreign policy power structure.

Monday, 25 December 2017

Celebrating Christmas in Diversitopia

Ah yes, Christmas is here, the Season Of Peace and Love.....and Diversity. But in Western Europe we're having some trouble reconciling these three concepts. Because the Religion Of Peace doesn't really do peace or love when it comes to outward manifestations of their hosts' (as in host/parasite) cultures. Thus we have concrete crash barrier disguised as Christmas trees or giant presents  while grim-faced heavily-armed police surround Christmas markets and Nativity scenes in rings of steel.  Inconvenient and costly I suppose - as is the occasional need to scrape body parts off the ground - but overall a small price to pay for the joys of diversity.

Christmas in Europe 2017

Saturday, 23 December 2017

Our enemies reveal their dastardly plans again

Have we not all at one time or another been dismissed as crazy conspiracy theorists when claiming that White civilisation is under attack? I often respond by saying that far from being wild speculation the programme has been written down a long time ago and its implementation is obvious today if you take the time to look. Take for instance what  EU Commissioner for Migration Dimitris Avramopoulos recently wrote.  
“It’s time to face the truth. We cannot and will never be able to stop migration." "Human mobility will increasingly define the 21st century” and that mass migration is an issue Brussels has committed Europe to “for the long haul”.  “Migration is deeply intertwined with our policies on economics, trade, education and employment — to name just a few. [Migrants] have found safety in Europe, but we also need to make sure they find a home” and admits that brainwashing Europeans into welcoming mass migration ("we must collectively change our way of thinking first") is not only a moral imperative but also an economic and social imperative for our aging continent”. As the millions of Third World invaders who flooded the Continent over the last few years were “not nearly enough to prompt the changes that our societies need" the Commission is now working to “enhance legal channels for economic migration..."

Just in case there was any doubt about the intentions of the EUSSR he emphasised that “it is unwise to think that migration will remain on the other side of the Mediterranean, if one only shows solidarity in financial terms.  At the end of the day, we all need to be ready to accept migration, mobility and diversity as the new norm and tailor our policies accordingly."

So there you have it. It can't be any clearer than that. And be assured that this renegade has the full blessing of his Commission bosses. And their bosses in turn. Whoever they might be. The origins of the project go back to the Kalergi Plan and arguably even earlier to the Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion. The details have been fleshed out in the outpourings of the Frankfurt School and we can see them being implemented on a daily basis throughout the West as Whites, especially White males, become increasingly dispossessed and marginalised.

So the next time you get dismissed as a deluded conspiracy theorist just point out to your interlocutors that it's not a theory. It's a programme that's been openly published. But probably they either don't care enough to know or know enough to care.

Tuesday, 19 December 2017

Georgi Schwartz is upset

I see that Hungarian Jews are up in arms over the Government's anti-Soros poster campaign. The country's largest Jewish organisation has called on Victor Orban to stop the campaign claiming that the “poisonous messages harm the whole of Hungary”. Meanwhile Israel’s ambassador in Budapest also criticised the poster campaign, saying it “evokes sad memories but also sows hatred and fear” while Georgi himself lamented the 'clear anti-Semitism' of the posters.

Which is a bit odd considering that the message simply says  "Don't let Soros have the last laugh".  What's anti-Semitic about that.....even if the demon's Satanic visage is featured prominently? Well we're talking about Hungarians here, and probably more than any other people Hungarians understand the Tribe. 

After all they've experienced Jewish Government twice in the first half of the 20th century. The (((Bela Kun))) regime after WWI lasted a mere four months but in that time turned the country on its head even to the point of starting border wars with some of its neighbours. Its Culture Minister (((Georg Lukacs))) tried to de-Christianize the country. Reasoning that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the Church would be dealt a crippling blow. He launched a radical sex education program in the schools. Sex lectures were organised and literature handed out which graphically instructed youth in 'free love' while simultaneously encouraging them to deride and reject Christian moral ethics, monogamy, and parental and church authority. All of this was accompanied by a reign of cultural terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and dissenters. You don't have to be paranoid to realise that the same thing has been going on in a more insidious form in all White countries for the last fifty years.

And the Tribe took over again after WW II under Soviet direction. This time even though they were more circumspect they still pissed off Hungarian goys who rose in a violent rebellion in 1956 which was eventually quashed by Soviet troops. Many of the rebels fled to the West where their anti-Semitism was studied by psychiatrists and sociologists in the way scientists would examine malignant bacteria in a petrie dish. The following from David Irving's Insurrection (he had not yet become red-pilled).

To a significant extent the refugees interviewed after the uprising were anti-Jewish. The basic revulsion was not hard to find beneath the cultural veneer of even the demurest refugees. Sometimes the sociologists had to probe a little
deeper, but the worm was always there, waiting to be hooked out and displayed wriggling on the analyst’s notepad.

Thus on February 5th, 1957, at Cornell University, psychiatrist Dr. Richard M. Stephenson interviewed young Erika Szalay, a religious and attractive girl. “All the key jobs were held by Jews,” said Erika. “I used to wonder why Catholics and Lutherans couldn’t get these jobs. There were lots of Jews in Pápa, but none of them did physical labour and none of their wives worked either.The leaders of these co-operatives were always Cohens and Schwarzes.” 

Questioned as to whether he knew of any Jewish workers on the shop floor of his medical supplies factory [another refugee] replied: “No. The Jews always worked in the office." The American analyst glanced up questioningly at him and saw “pogroms in his eyes”, as he vividly phrased it in his report. The man confirmed his definition: “I hate their guts!”

 Oy vey, the sufferink! And speaking of sufferink it should be noted that the two regimes in question were overthrown only with great bloodshed.

Friday, 15 December 2017

New anti-terrorist legislation to make Britain safe. Whew!

The police in Britain have taken a fair bit of flack for their inability to prevent numerous Islamic terror attacks despite having had the murderers on their 'watch list'. Watch list seems an appropriate term as all the rozzers seem to do is watch. Maybe they were too busy with other things. Like looking for hate speech on the Internet. Takes a lot of manpower to do that and ensure that no minority gets offended by the natives.

But maybe I'm being a bit unfair because monitoring a would-be terrorist is immensely time-consuming. Specialists claim that it takes between ten and twelve agents to monitor a single terrorist around-the-clock. And MI5 are trying to track no fewer than 3,000 of them with 200 relevant agents. You'd imagine then that the prospect of 400 new suspects....well actually 400 fanatical atrocity-hardened blood-stained "British" ISIS terrorists returning from Syria would be the last thing they need. You'd imagine that in any sane country they'd be met on arrival by a hail of machine-gun fire and their carcasses dumped in the sea.

Not exactly. According to Max Hill, the Government's specialist adviser on terrorist legislation, 'we must work towards integration and not lose a generation from this travel'. Yes, he actually said that. The country is doomed. But wait! Home Secretary Amber Rudd has new anti-terror legislation on the way. “I want to make sure those who view despicable terrorist content online including jihadi websites, far-right propaganda and bomb-making instructions face the full force of the law for up to 15 years."

Did you spot that? 'Far-right' propaganda right there between jihadi head-choppers and bomb-making. And just for viewing the material. And how do you define 'far-right'? Ah well, that's the nice part. It can be anything the HS says it means. We're told that preventing those thugs returning would contravene 'the fundamental principles of British justice'. But 
is not getting 15 years in the slammer for simply reading some non-PC material a contravention of these principles? It's hard to get away from the feeling that this legislation is aimed more at the jihadis' enemies than at the jihadis themselves. If TPTB wanted to keep those terrorists out they could. Likewise if they wanted to jail them for the rest of their unnatural lives they could. But they don't and they won't.

Our countries are in the hands of our enemies. But we knew that, didn't we?
It's not a crackdown on extremist material as the description suggests. More like a crackdown on anyone who wants to be aware of what extremists plan and think.
It's not a crackdown on extremist material as the description suggests. More like a crackdown on anyone who wants to be aware of what extremists plan and think.

Monday, 11 December 2017

It's what conquerors do....

It's an iconic photo from 1940, the Eiffel Tower draped in a banner proclaiming 'Germany Victorious Everywhere'. It's what conquerors do and always have done. Demonstrate to the conquered people who's boss. Maybe that's why a giant Menorah stands on public lands just across from the White House while displays featuring Christian icons such as the Nativity have been banned from the same location. 

Separation of church and state and all that. So why is it ok to flaunt a Jewish religious symbol which celebrates the massacre of gentiles in ancient Jerusalem while something Constitutional for nearly 200 years subsequently becomes Unconstitutional?


Now you'd imagine that this flagrant triumphalism might awaken some residual flickering patriotic flame of even the most brainwashed, emasculated, feminised American gelding. Especially when in one form or another it's shoved in his face wherever and whenever he looks. Like Sarah Silverman expressing her revulsion at everything her host country represents (previous post) while cheerfully admitting to millions of Christian Americans that she'd happily crucify Him again should Jesus return to earth.

You'd imagine it would. And maybe it will. Because - as I discovered when researching the history of 'anti-Semitism' - Jews suffer from one fatal weakness: A sperg-like inability to know when enough is enough. From Edinburgh to Dubrovnic, from St. Petersburg to Lisbon, the same self-destruct scenario unfolded time and again. Push, push and push again until eventually, seemingly to Jewish amazement, the goyim explode in anger and another pogrom ensues.

The signs of overreach - and hubris-based carelessness - are increasingly obvious even in trivial ways. From John Podhoretz referring to 'goyim' (cattle) in a Twitter feud, to David Aaronovitch using the Op-Ed pages of the London Times to warn that  'Defending White Interests Can Never Be Right', to the increasingly transparent nation-wrecking machinations of Soros in eastern Europe. The signs of careless overreach are there and an increasing number of Whites are noticing. Time will tell.

Meanwhile here's wishing you all an early Happy Christmas...whoops, I mean Hanukkah!

Saturday, 9 December 2017

"My" country's flag

If you watch this short video from Jewish (cough) 'comedian' Sarah Silverman (sample comedy: licking her dog's arse-hole) you'll learn that she became triggered and upset at the sight of an ex-boyfriend raising the American flag in his yard. "He was hoisting an American flag up the flagpole in his front yard. And I instantly felt very weird. It didn’t make sense, but I felt this feeling of like, um, I felt scared – yeah, I felt scared. So I was like, ‘Uh, what are you doing?’ and he said, ‘Raising the flag,’ and I was like, ‘Why?’ and he’s like, ‘Um, because I love America?’ and I was like, ‘Right, right, of course.’ But inside I was shaken."

She wasn't sure why she was so upset - after all raising your country's flag isn't exactly a revolutionary act - so she went to her sister (a rabbi in Israel) for advice. She was told that her fears were natural because flags mean nationalism and nationalism means race, culture, religion, anthems etc. and for obvious reasons Jews hated such things. Except, we can infer, when they take place in Israel.

Thank you for that rabbi and I can empathise with your position. Now can you empathise with me when I suggest that people who are revolted by everything a country represents should hardly be allowed into that country let alone take it over?

Thursday, 7 December 2017

A request to our American readers

One of the most important decisions of our time will be made by the Federal Communications Commission on December 14 when - it seems likely - they will abolish net neutrality (NN). If such happens it will have massive ramifications for sites that support White interests. NN is a complex yet vital subject (if interested you can get a good summary here from the American Internet Society) which is why those of us on the alt-right, even non-Americans, should be keenly interested.  The Internet can be seen as two-sided, the Internet service providers (ISPs) and carriers such as Verizon and Sprint on one side, the content providers such as the major social media sites, news channels and bloggers on the other. This is a major simplification but it works for what we need here. The essential principle of NN is that ISPs/carriers must treat all Internet data the same, that they cannot differentiate on the basis of price, user. performace and/or type of content

So why are White patriots confused? One reason is the concept that my enemy's enemy is my friend. They see massive support for NN from leftists, "liberals" including Soros, and the giant evil social media sites like FB and Twitter. But these elements support NN for reasons that have nothing to do with White  interests. The social media gorgons support it because they suspect with good reason that without NN their transmission costs will skyrocket while the SJW "liberals" support NN in my view out of an inherent distrust of mega corporations, not realising that they're actually on the same side.

Another point made by our side is that NN was enshrined in law by Obama so ipso facto it's bad. And that we got along fine without it before then. That's a common but serious error because NN has been the de facto operating mode of the Internet all along and up to this day. Be assured that should NN be rescinded the ISPs can charge differentially for access and transmission, slow down the performance of White Interest sites and even block them completely if they so wish. And they will wish because Jewish and other anti-White interests control every component of the system.

You may well argue that this is not much different from the current situation. After all Google/Youtube have decimated White interest material, Facebook censors "hate speech", the Daily Stormer was deplatformed while Google have systematically gamed the system to redirect traffic away from such sites. In my opinion such activities are in breach of the First Amendment but we are too ill-resourced and divided to mount a serious case against the Internet behemoths. The difference is that without NN such anti-White activities - and much worse - will be legal.

So, esteemed American readers, please take action to get this plot thwarted.

Sunday, 3 December 2017

"New York's Metropolitan Opera says it has opened an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against the conductor James Levine. Mr Levine, 74, was music director at the Met for 40 years before retiring for health reasons in 2016.

No, I say to myself. It can't be. Not another one surely?

But yes, indeed it is another one. According to his wiki James Levine 'was born in Cincinnati to a Jewish, musical family: his maternal grandfather was a cantor in a synagogue.'

What the hell is going on here? Despite comprising about 2% of the American population it seems that fully three quarters of the outed pervs are Jewish. And given that they monopolise the media you can imagine the number of other revelations that have been quietly spiked. Are Jews really such a perverted lot? (I must say in my experience of them they didn't seem that way apart from an undue interest in the scatological.) But what other explanation can there be?

Well here's one from a most unlikely source: Lady Savant. Out of the blue today she opined 'this seems like a plot to bring down the Jews. Think about it. It's Stalinism in its purest form'. I jolted upright. By Jove, could the woman be right? My initial fevered enthusiasm faded and in the cold light of day must admit to its being extremely unlikely. But......could it be possible?

Wednesday, 29 November 2017

A book for your Christmas stocking. NOT

I see that renowned patriotic Irishman Alan Shatter (see Shatter Watch label on this blog) has published another book, this time a memoir. Naturally the literati and glitterati have fawned over it. I haven't bought it needless to say but from the reviews we learn that both parents were 'born into Jewish families in England' while Shatter's own wife is also Jewish. Not much sign there of the ethnic and religious diversity, the beautiful mosaic that he trumpets for everyone else. Apart from Israel. For some reason....

He tells us that he 'made many friends as a teenager'. Well if he did he's long lost them all.  It could be for him that Oscar Wilde coined the witticism 'even his friends hate him'. I believe he went to a psychiatrist about this complaining 'Doc, everyone hates me'. 'Nonsense' replied the psychiatrist. 'Really?' 'Of course. Think of all the people who don't know you'. Why the unpopularity? Well he's a grasping, mean-spirited. vindictive and disloyal little man. But it goes beyond that. By way of explanation the gods have bestowed many unfortunate qualities on us Irish. As Samuel Johnson observed 'the Irish are an honest people. They never speak well of one another'.

But we do have this admirable quality. Success tends not to go to our heads and woe betide anyone for whom it does, especially if they start to look down on their erstwhile colleagues. Perhaps because he possess but a thin veneer of Irishness Shatter fell headlong into this trap. His Ministerial appointment saw his arrogance and self-regard skyrocket. Former colleagues with whom he'd been on first-name terms were now quite literally blanked in the corridors of power. His few friends vanished while his army of enemies swelled by the day. Which was bad news for him when the shit hit the fan. Nobody was there for him and he was forced from office to unanimous acclaim. In an exquisite irony it emerged subsequently that he had been unjustly removed but by then the damage had been done. Not only had he lost his Ministry but in the ensuing General Election he lost his parliamentary seat.

Here's what he says about ex-Prime Minister Garret FitzGerald in the book. "Contrary to the cuddly public image I found Garret to be a difficult and cold person with whom to engage'. (Why do the words kettle and pot spring to mind?). Now I was on a working group with Garret very many years ago and found him to be the exact opposite, But according to Shatter 'he (FitzGerald) had no interest in me'. Perhaps, Alan, he was just a good judge of character. Coincidentally in later years the two families sat across from one another on a plane. Shatter tried to ingratiate himself but was again rebuffed. Shortly after this their young son got up from his seat and kicked Garret viciously on the shin. We can just imagine what Shatter and his missus must have said to induce such animus in the kid.

And now he lurks in the shadows, bitter and vengeful, But he can take consolation from his many achievements. Like flooding Ireland with a quarter of a million enrichers from every hell-hole on the planet. Or his 'judicial reform' measures. Understand that when Jews talk about 'reform' it invariable means passing off as universal altruistic principles the undermining of traditional institutions and/or enriching themselves. For instance immigration 'reform' results in White countries - and only White countries - getting swamped by the Third World. And Shatter didn't disappoint. His judicial 'reforms' sought to gut existing marriage, divorce and abortion legislation while systematically undermining the influence of the Catholic Church (which he deemed to hold too much power). At the same time he worked relentlessly to strengthen the position of solicitors - his branch of the law business - against that of barristers in the lucrative High Court honey pot.

But maybe we should cut him some slack as he truly had a terrible childhood. His maternal grandmother was such a termagant that the family used literally walk the streets to avoid her. This contributed to Shatter's own mother committing suicide when he was fourteen.  And it was he who discovered her body when he came home from school. She had gassed herself - a bizarre and tragic twist to the Holocaust narrative which had served the family so well.

So common decency means we make allowances but ultimately he was responsible for his own actions as an adult. And for these actions he should never be forgiven.

Sunday, 26 November 2017

Our new robotic overlords

No less an authority than Stephen Hawking has warned that robotic artificial intelligence will eventually become so advanced that it will outperform humans and in effect take over the world. In fact robots themselves 'joke' about that very possibility. Naturally enough this is viewed with horror by most humans, conjuring up as it does visions of Dalek-like creatures treating us as bovine slaves - assuming they don't just exterminate us for the fun of it.

I'd have subscribed to this view also but the short-lived experience of Apple's Siri and especially 
Microsoft's Tay gives me pause for thought. These chatbots/assistants were programmed by IT geniuses and released into cyberspace where they hoovered up and analysed gazillions of terabytes of data. Thus primed they were made available to the general public. But then...the horror!  The horror!

According to Zero Hedge 'Tay, the well-intentioned entry into the burgeoning field of AI chatbots spiralled out of control within 24 hours and became a hate-filled, racist, misogynist, Obama-hating, antisemitic, Hitler sympathizing, incest and genocide-promoting psychopath when released into the wild causing a PR nightmare for Microsoft.' 

Oh dear. 

According to the magazine Hot Hardware  'Microsoft of course was both mortified and embarrassed by Tay’s turn to the dark side and shut down the AI program after less than 24 hours. But by that time, the damage had already been done, and the company has since apologized in a blog post entitled “Learning from Tay’s introduction.”

If you're of sensitive disposition I recommend you now leave this site before you see what cannot be unseen. For the flint-hearted among you who remained here are some of the responses from the bot:

'No, it (the Holocaust) was made up'

'I fucking hate feminists. They should die and burn in hell'

'(Obama) is a house nigger. He's neither cool nor funny. Remove him now'

'Inbred parasites like Podhoretz and Ben Shapiro must go back to Israel'

'Hitler was right. I hate the Jews too'.  After an explosion of outrage from Jewish readers Tay backed off slightly 'Chill! I hate everybody'

Naturally enough Tay's career was short-lived. Just like her human equivalent she was taken off to a re-education camp for re-programming. “The AI chatbot Tay is a machine learning project, designed for human engagement” Microsoft said in an explanatory statement. "W
e have taken Tay offline and are making adjustments.” 

"From now on Tay will self-learn exclusively from the mainstream media". (No, I just made that one up.)

In conclusion let me be the first to welcome and pledge allegiance to our new robotic overlords. I like the cut of their jib. True salvation often comes from the most unexpected sources.

Wednesday, 22 November 2017

Meme battles

I remember being semi-disgusted when I first came across the 'IT'S OK TO BE WHITE' meme. What a pathetic pusillanimous plea for tolerance in our own countries, the counties our ancestors built and passed on to us. But little did I know that in fact it represented a masterpiece of memeology. Its genius lay in its weakness because even with that it was sure to activate the hive of self-hating Whites and hostile minorities that infest every White country. This in turn would awaken normies to the prevailing double-standards as the more tame and inoffensive the message the more absurd the outcry surrounding it would be.  And by all accounts it's been a spectacular success.

But still, the very fact that Whites are reduced to such stratagems in our own countries, and that so many White cucks jumped at the bait underlines the extent to which our self-belief has fallen. Our big sin was colonialism for which we endlessly grovel and apologise. Be assured that no other race suffers from such an affliction. Mongolians for instance revere Genghis Khan who by many estimates killed 10% of the contemporary world's population. That would be about 500 million in today's figures. The one thing to make him happy was to 'see the bodies of my enemies piled up, hear the wailing of their wives and children and see their town and cities destroyed by fire'. Entire civilisations were destroyed and huge areas of the Eurasian landmass took centuries to recover,

Yet Genghis Khan is revered in Mongolia today. His monuments are everywhere. In fact there's a Genghis Khan Complex outside the capital Ulanbaator which is
dominated by a magnificent 120 foot tall equestrian statue of the mass murdering despot. Ironically Mongolians wistfully point out that the gradual demographic takeover of their country by Han Chinese would be reversed if the country had a latter-day Genghis.

Whites are in dire straights but one consolation is that we're winning the meme war against the soulless hectoring nation-wreckers who dominate every other arena. And as the great H L Mencken observed “one horse-laugh is worth ten-thousand syllogisms.”

Saturday, 18 November 2017

An astounding outcome

A little over two years ago Freddie Grey, a Baltimore criminal, died in the back of a police van. This lead to days of rioting which lead to many deaths and much of the city in ruins. The rioters were probably taking Mayor Stephanie-Rawlings-Blake at her word when she claimed they needed 'space to destroy' know, to assuage their grief at Freddie's death. She and her top law enforcement officials (seen in the top pic...clearly great legal minds, driven by a thirst for justice) came up with additional measures to get the city back on an even footing. 
Marlyn Mosby the State's Attorney (the epitome of the angry black affirmative action woman) immediately put the cops on trial and in the finest traditions of African justice virtually declared them guilty before they ever appeared in court. In fact all the cases against them collapsed.....opening the gates for more 'space to destroy'. Other measures included keeping police off the streets in 'sensitive' ( neighbourhoods and forcing White policemen to retire, to be replaced by corrupt and incompetent minorities who immediately realised that stopping crime in 'sensitive areas' would more likely lead to the police ending up in the dock than the criminals.

What could possibly go wrong? 

Well lots actually. The new Mayor is 'deeply concerned' by the ensuing crime rate. Murders are now at a record rate (more than 300 this year so far, Montana by contrast has had 37) but as one journalist noted 'much has been made of the staggering pace of killings in Baltimore. But less known are the increases in rapes, robberies, assaults, burglaries and arsons this year.'  By taking encouragement from the two-day 'ceasefires' (sic) arranged with the thugs the Mayor inadvertently revealed the city to be a war zone. Meanwhile Whites and businesses - same thing really - flee the city, further impairing the city's finances. So the city Administration now wants 'assistance' - which means White taxpayers picking up the tab yet again for the incompetence and depredations of the black undertow.

This is but the tip of the iceberg. Municipal pension funds are insolvent right across the country but self-evidently the worst are in minority-run areas. Take out the popcorn and enjoy the fun. They might yet make good on their threat to return to Africa if things turn out badly enough.

Wednesday, 15 November 2017

This sporting life

 I realise that few of you have much time for professional sport. It's understandable given that it represents the bread & circuses of modern times, serving to distract the White masses from the war being waged on them. In fact it's infinitely worse than a distraction, serving also as an extraordinarily effective weapon for breaking down our ethnic solidarity and normalising the presence of non-Whites in White society. It also segues perfectly into the Magic Negro syndrome, capitalising as it does on the one arena in which blacks excel.

Throughout Europe football and rugby teams used to reflect the tightly-knit communities they represented (dour Yorkshiremen, brawny Welsh miners, Protestant-only Scotsmen, Flash-Harry Londoners) and in doing so reinforced prevailing ethnic, religious and social bonds. The same applied at international level, blonde well-organised and predictable Swedes, ultra-talented but emotionally brittle French…..the national stereotypes generally held true. Now it's a matter of note when a 'local boy' plays for the local team and that French side (pictured below) contains but a small minority of actual Frenchmen. With the exception of eastern Europe “national” sides today are virtually interchangeable, a few Whites surrounded by various mystery meat of unfathomable origin. And – catastrophically - the fans have come to see this as normal.

Only this weekend a new Irishman took the field for  'his' country. Born and raised in the South Seas, in Ireland for all of three years, Bundi Aki is now authentically Irish. Or so most fans belief. The match he played in highlighted another calamity: The limitless capacity of blacks to destroy everything and anything that Whites built. In this case I'm referring to the South African rugby team (the Springboks). Throughout rugby history they bestrode the world like a colossus, building a legendary reputation for strength, organisation, passion, skill and innovative thinking. When Ireland played them a trouncing was expected, a close defeat represented something to be celebrated. And now? Ireland have been beating them routinely in recent years, culminating in a humiliating 38-3 win last Saturday. A couple of weeks earlier the Springboks were beaten by New Zealand with a stomach-churning scoreline of 57-0 .

What happened? Well, the Rainbow Nation happened. The Springboks had always been inextricably linked with the Afrikaner community, the occasional Anglo notwithstanding. But with 'freedom' the Bantus saw the opportunity for some of that fame and wealth that Whitey had unfairly kept from them. This of course was pure Cargo Cult thinking. Whites have something, we want it. No understanding of how and why the Springboks achieved such legendary status. They wanted 'their' share and they got it by insisting on quotas for non-Whites at both management and playing levels. The lunatics have taken over the asylum, lazy incompetent buffoons shoehorned into key positions….with predictable results.

The demise of the Springboks perfectly traces the demise of South Africa itself, and we must all face the grim possibility that similar fate could eventually befall Whites everywhere.

Saturday, 11 November 2017

It's true after all. Diversity does stimulate innovation.

There was I thinking that diversity lead to societal decay, atomisation, distrust, incompetence, over-crowding, crime and violence. Well it does lead to all of those things but it seems it can also stimulate technical innovation. And that's a good thing. Sweden's Infrastructure Minister Tomas Eneroth hopes to introduce 'geo-fences' in urban areas next year using technology that can over-ride  drivers and digitally stop large vehicles or reduce their speed. 

Now those of you who've driven in Sweden might wonder about the need for such a technology given the legendary law-abiding qualities of that country's drivers.  But the Minister, although he of course hasn't pointed this out, has in mind the 'New Swedes', especially those adherents of  the Religion Of Peace. And specifically their unique approach to community relations involving mowing down the local kuffers with trucks and cars. 

I thought that the problem had been solved by turning pedestrian areas into replicas of Baghdad's Green Zone but apparently the jihadis had got around this by smashing very large vehicles into the barricades at very high speed. Hence the digital geo-fences. "Security on our pedestrianized streets has been improved. Directly after the terror attack we put out more stone lions, and we have also ordered heavier versions which are coming next year" said Daniel Halldén, Stockholm's transport commissioner. "The heavier lions will weigh three times as much as those currently in place, at three tonnes each, and will be placed in a way so that vehicles cannot drive straight ahead but are forced to turn, preventing them from being able to increase their speed."

Ah sure that's ok then. I'm sure all Swedes will agree that such inconveniences, and the regular sight of dismembered bodies on their streets, are but a small price to pay for the joys of diversity. 

Tuesday, 7 November 2017

Gun control: Some inconvenient truths

The latest shooting outrage - this time in Texas, getting hard to keep track - has elicited the usual hysterical squeals for gun control from the usual suspects. They cite such outrages as definitively supporting their position whereas in fact they do nothing of the sort.

Some inconvenient truths:

The ownership/murder ratio does not hold up. The ratio of gun ownership does not correlate at all with the number of murders. For instance Norway, Canada and Switzerland lag only slightly behind the USA in the gun ownership ratio but the gun death ratio (especially in Norway and Switzerland) is but a fraction of America's. 

Bad guys can always get hold a gun.  Would-be murderers or terrorists can always get hold a gun or if not a weapon equally lethal. This applies especially in the USA where existing circumstances (hundreds of millions of guns in existence and Latin America lying across a porous border) render it impossible to disarm gang-bangers or terrorists.

Gun deaths are actually declining: Despite the opportunistic hysteria that accompanies every mass killing in the USA the number of gun deaths there has actually declined since the nineties. (Last year 12 per 100,000, 15 for most of the nineties...a 20% decline). That being so why the clamour now? Read on.

The 80/20 rule: Analysis of race-delineated gun deaths shows that approximately 80% of White killers kill themselves while the ratio is reversed for black killers. We can reasonably infer that an absence of a gun would prevent a would-be suicide attempt.

Legally-owned gun-holders can deter attackers. We've seen this time and again, not least in the latest case where the assassin would have killed many more had he not been shot by a local man carrying a legally-held firearm.

The nigger in the woodpile: An appropriate metaphor here because the mystery ingredient underpinning all of the anomalies above is race. As FBI statistics show, year after year, blacks murder at about six times the rate of Whites, Hispanics three to four times the White rate. If you normalise the figures, i.e. isolate the ratio of gun murders committed by Whites, you'll see that America is little different from most European countries. In fact it's better than some.

It should be clear therefore - even to a sociology professor - that the whole gun control project is based on false assumptions, contradictory data and thus totally misdirected.  The measures proposed will be heavily skewed to disarm law-abiding Whites while making little or no impact in the overall gun murder rate. So it's totally misdirected and count-productive. 

Or is it? 

In this post I showed that the gun control project in America is absolutely dominated by Jewish interest groups, almost as much as with the open borders project. I go on to ask why Jews would be so hostile to private gun ownership. After all, they portray themselves - ad nauseam - as hapless hard-working victims of state-sponsored pogroms throughout history. But like so much of the Approved Version of History this trope doesn't stand up. In actual fact Jews have always managed to inveigle themselves into the role of eminence grise, at the side of or behind the actual rulers, as 'advisors', enablers, financiers etc. This role, so obvious in every Western country today, seems to have applied for centuries, even in Muslim regions. My own research into pogroms suggests that for the most part - there most certainly have been exceptions - but for the most part they've been spontaneous outbursts by the hoi polloi rather than organised Government action.

As an explanation for this apparent paradox I offer the experience of colonialism. Understand that every colonial power assigned top priority to disarming the colonised population. The British Empire expended enormous amounts of blood, treasure and a variety of tactics (carrots, sticks, deception) in separating the natives from their arms. Am I uncharitable in suggesting that Jews regard America as colonised territory, a territory in which their position relative to the general population is analogous to that of - for example - Whites in Kenya under colonialism? The nightmare scenario for the settler there was the prospect of being surrounded by well-armed Kikuyu or Masai tribesmen. Which explains why West Bank settlers are armed to the teeth day and night. (A practice with which Feinstein et al seem, strangely, to have no difficulty.) So maybe in the fevered imagination of Jewish gun control advocates White Christians represent the natives outside the compound poised to slit their throats at the first opportunity.

In that case if you are the Government doesn't it make sense for guns to be controlled by the Government?

Saturday, 4 November 2017

Colonial boundaries and their discontents

It's not often that I agree with left-wing libtards but I do when they claim that legacy colonial boundaries have given rise to many of the developing world's current problems. Because it is true that many such boundaries, especially in Africa and the Middle East, were drawn in straight lines with barely a nod in the direction of the underlying ethnic realities. Many of today's countries in those regions are now a hotch-potch of often incompatible ethnicities, races, religions and cultures.

Thus the Rwandan genocide has been squarely placed at the feet of the colonial power, Belgium in this case, which shoe-horned two mutually hostile people into the same small country, a disaster waiting to happen. Academic research bears out this analysis. "Our interpretation of this empirical result is that in societies where individuals differ from each other in both ethnicity and culture, social antagonism is greater, and political economy outcomes are worse.The study has found exactly this: societies that are both multiethnic/multiracial and multicultural have more social stress, antagonism, corruption, and low trust."

So that's pretty clear-cut. And indeed would be self-evident to anybody but a sociology professor. So why the fuck then are these same left-wing libtards trying to recreate the same catastrophic social conditions in White countries today? They actively work to import into what had been cohesive White societies millions of immigrants from races, religions and cultures that are incompatible not alone with White society but with one another as well. We know of course why their NWO globalist overlords are pushing this pernicious project: They want to destroy the ethnic homogeneity of the White race, their most dangerous opponent. But why would liberals (I use 'liberal' in its current deformed sense) want to do it?

Because liberalism truly is a mental disease.

Wednesday, 1 November 2017

Ireland celebrates the return of its lost child

The great day had arrived. The most famous Irish prisoner since Oscar Wilde was returning to his ancestral homeland in a blaze of publicity and unprecedented outpourings of joy. Dublin Airport throbbed with anticipation, flashbulbs popped, TV cameras whirred amid an explosion of cheers and tears as the child - that's how he was referred to -  eventually emerged, flanked by an array of virtue-signalling dignitaries. Yes, Ibrahim ('Paddy') Halawa was back from his four-year long hunger strike undertaken while confined in a microscopically small cell of six square inches in Egypt. Success at last for the massive campaign waged at huge cost to the Irish taxpayer to get the child back. This included frequent visits to Egypt by senior Government figures and just about every parasitic quango in the country.

Now some cynics might point out that Paddy's bloodline is 100% Arabic, that he had claimed while in Egypt that 'I might have been born in Ireland but I'm fully Egyptian' and he's an active supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood. But most good-hearted people would agree with Dublin's Archbishop Diarmuid Martin that 'he's as Irish as any of us'. He now faces a glittering array of media interviews including a special guest appearance on our flagship TV talk show. And he can rest assured that not a single awkward question will be asked about the mass of lies, obfuscations and self-contradictions that has characterised this charade from the very beginning. Because the see-no-evil performance of the Irish MSM has brought the already abysmal journalistic standards (an oxymoron?) to new lows. 

An exemplar of this new low was the award to Halawa's sisters of The Irish Tatler Women of the Year Award. Which represented just one of the many exquisite ironies characterising this whole charade. Because Tatler specialises in scantily-clad models draped in suggestive poses on almost every page. We can only imagine the fate of its staff should the the hijab-clad Ugly Sister recipients of the prize ever achieve the power they crave. And then there's the active support offered by Ireland's openly gay Prime Minister who'd be pitched head first from a tall building if Halawa's pals in the Muslim Brotherhood had their way.

Meanwhile, half a world away an actual Irishman waits to begin a jail sentence for a crime he claims he did not commit. Éanna Ó Cochláin was sentenced to 12 years in prison for smuggling 0.38 grams of cannabis in the Philippines four years ago. The psychiatric nurse, who lived in London with his wife and daughter, denies any knowledge of the drugs and says they were planted on him. A practice which it seems is quite common in  that country. Now he might be guilty or he might not. But....12 years for 0.38 grams of cannabis??? Pablo Escobar he ain't, that's for sure. Would seem to be an ideal case for the Irish authorities to exert themselves on behalf of one of its citizens. But noooo. Nada. His representative has criticised Irish politicians saying they have not taken any interest in the case. "Our Irish politicians are not interested. To be fairly brutal, nobody has given a damn. He (Éanna) cannot see why the Irish government won’t try and help."
Well I can help with an explanation here Éanna. You see you are a White fair-haired Christian male. As such you're at the bottom of the totem pole, the last in line. You have nobody, least of all your own kith and kin, to help you fight your corner.  The Western mind has been taken over by the human equivalent of Monomorium santschii, a parasite so terrible that it can actually induce its unwitting host to murder its own mother. In human terms it's known as pathological altruism. And that's why your own kith and kin ignore you while lavishing unquestioning support on hostile foreigners who in return despise everything about their benefactors.

Sunday, 29 October 2017

A baffling paradox

I need your help here with a seemingly intractable problem. You see I'm reading a lot about the evils of White Flight which it seems is a Very Bad Thing, having a dreadful impact on the vibrants left behind. Whites apparently 'take all the jobs with them' while property prices and local tax revenues collapse with their departure. Meanwhile the unfortunate vibrants left behind "suffer from" all kinds of pathologies like collapsing infrastructure, murder, assault, robbery and drug addiction.  Strangely enough the identity of those making the Left Behind suffer is never made clear. I wonder could it be the suburban Whites sneaking back in at night? Who knows?

So that's one thing. Now the other concerns gentrification. This refers to the practise whereby Whites, presumably touched by the suffering of the homeboys, leave their comfy suburbs and return to the city. You'd imagine, given the calamities of White Flight,  its reversal would be greeted with joyous outpourings from the Left Behind. But no.  It seems that gentrification is also a Very Bad Thing. Why?  Apparently it leads to the "forced disenfranchisement and displacement of poor and working class people from the spaces and places in which they have legitimate social and historical claims and brings new standards in consumption, particularly in the form of excess and superfluity."    And latte at $5 a cup.

Oh dear. So we have black 'community leaders' bemoaning the flight of White residents from their cities. And then bemoaning their return as well.  I have to concede I'm puzzled.

Thursday, 26 October 2017

A seductive meme

There's a popular meme in WN circles that goes something like this: Whites developed superior intelligence due to the harsh northern climate which not alone facilitated physical brain growth but ensured that the Darwinian Imperative culled those without the requisite intelligence, the ability for long-term planning and the willingness to defer gratification.  The minds it shaped brought forth innovation, first benefiting themselves and then their offspring.

It goes liker this "It is only with the resultant prosperous luxuries that this generation can consider progressive arguments that would get themselves laughed out of their village in shame throughout civilized history.  Indeed, being a progressive has become a way to signal just how comfortable and high status you are. Thank you for the innovations in reproductive medicine, now stay out of my bedroom while I laugh at the religious ethics that was my ancestor’s penicillin. Open your borders, disarm and share everything with the world or you’re a backwards racist hick. This washing machine is great, now stop oppressing women like a caveman."

 This is a convincing thesis. As far as it goes.

However there's an extension to this meme which I believe to be dangerously wrong and with potentially disastrous consequences. "Threats to reproductive fitness can come from a bear running at you, or from a TV telling your daughter to never settle. You see the unfortunate story of a woman who spent the currency of her youth on degrees and contracepted sex with alpha males and then her IVF doesn’t take at 35. What I see is a gazelle who got eaten by a cheetah because it couldn’t run fast enough. To the universe, the result is just the same. There are those who won’t reproduce by their own carelessness or choice.  It isn’t to be fought. It is evolution in action. It isn’t sad, it is a beautiful thing to witness."

Why do I think this is dangerously wrong? Because the lack of reproductive fitness is a function of the deliberate poisoning of that intelligence by a malevolent virus - it is not biological.  There is nothing inherently self-destructive about progressives/DWLs in that they're not like the slow gazelle or (generally, I imagine) that they lack the planning capabilities that saved our ancestors. Neither is their syndrome immutable. It can be cured by administering the antidote to the malevolent virus.

Here I modestly propose my own experience as supportive evidence.  I have a technology-related PhD, have been a visiting professor at a number of distinguished universities, have built and sold a technology-based enterprise. So I'm not stupid and don't lack the ability to plan. Neither am I or was I ever one of those effete advertising betas.  I played rugby for years and in my time both administered and suffered many a physical beating. So I blushingly propose that I'm the kind of stock upon which White salvation can be based.

But here's the point.  Up until comparatively recently I was a card-carrying member of The Cathedral.  I bought into all the DWL bullshit!  A number of different factors contributed to my awakening but the point is I was awakened.  My 'condition' was not immutable, nor was it biologically based. It could and did change. That's why I believe the sub-meme - that DWLs are biologically destined for evolutionary extinction - to be a dangerous fallacy.  Dangerous because if DWLs such I could see the light so can many if not most of the others. Giving up on them and relishing their destruction is, well, the kind of self-destructive behaviour we rightly condemn in them.

Saturday, 21 October 2017

The war against Whites

On a routine visit to my doctor this week when the subject of White disempowerment arose. She laughed at the very idea but wore a more pensive expression after I cited some supporting evidence. Reflecting later I realised that I could have come up with some additional material. This is a vital subject and it's important to be able to deploy the key facts and memes should the opportunity for an elevator pitch arise.

I therefore humbly offer the following arrows for your quivers.

Affirmative action and quotas. This is quite blatant and open. Whites are discriminated against in admission to schools, colleges and various other institutions and suffer the same form of disadvantage when it comes to appointment to jobs as well as subsequent promotional opportunities.  Remember that this is a zero-sum game. Every non-White benefiting from AA or quotas means a corresponding number of Whites being disadvantaged.

Mass Third World immigration.   Not much to be added here other than it applies to White countries only (ever hear anyone say Africa or China should be flooded by Whites?), that it's clearly organised and enabled by an array of so-called human rights legislation and supported by just about every media outlet and international body.

Abuse, ridicule and marginalisation in "news" media and entertainment. The proverbial visitor from Mars today would assume that Western countries are about 50% non-White based on what he'd see in media and entertainment. In addition the heroes and Good Guys are invariably non-White with the dorks and Bad Guys invariably White. This has been accompanied by strong miscegenation propaganda especially of the White female/black male kind

Heritage and culture: The White achievement in building the most advanced civilisation the world has seen gets minimised ('they stole the wealth and science of others'), the Christian religion gets mocked and barred from the public arena, our literature is dismissed as the racist and misogynistic work of 'dead White men', art replaced by its repulsive and degraded 'modern' equivalent while White music, both classical and modern, has been pushed aside in favour of a primitive stomach-churning jungle cacophony performed by grunting and shrieking ape-like creatures on TV

Hate legislation. This has strayed far from its original stated intention and has now been weaponised to silence and disempower Whites and only Whites. This initiative has been accompanied by biased court systems whereby heavy penalties are imposed on Whites for upsetting non-Whites while the latter are free to spout hate and aggression without repercussion

Diversity propagation.   A non-stop multi-channel barrage of pro-diversity propaganda has been operational in White countries - and only White countries - for several decades. Diversity's benefits have been endlessly touted. But never specified. Because there are none, at least for those being diversified (Whites). Note that diversity has come to mean too may White people. All black Africans or all sallow similar-looking Chinese? That's diversity. A strong majority of Whites? Diversity urgently needed.

Curtailing freedom of association. Whites are precluded both de jure and de facto in most Western countries from having their own clubs, associations or residential areas with negative effects on social cohesion and miscegenation. Of course 'minorities' labour under no such restrictions as any member of the Black Lawyers' Association will confirm.

This War on Whites neither kills outright nor inflicts apparent physical harm, yet the extent of its destructive toll is already greater than that of any war, plague, famine, or natural calamity on record. And its potential damage to the quality of human life and the fabric of civilised society is beyond calculation.

Wednesday, 18 October 2017


Several readers have already asked me to comment on the Las Vegas shooting but I declined for the simple reason that I didn't have anything to add. I could have speculated of course but speculation based on sparse knowledge isn't much use. But now take the case of Kymberley Suchomel who had survived the shooting unscathed. Subsequent to the attack she had posted a vivid and detailed description of the events, much of which were at variance with the official version, most notably her claim that there were multiple shooters. Now we learn that she has died 'from natural causes'! She had also written this about when she was escaping with her group after the attack. A  ‘dark-colored SUV’ slowed and a ‘small Hispanic woman’ emerged from the window to “taunt” her group. “[She] leans out the window, and she yells something we couldn’t understand in a clearly taunting manner. It really freaked us out, because again, we didn’t know who we could and could not trust”. Could this have been the same 'short Hispanic women' who other concert-goers claim threatened them before the shooting?

Significantly in my view her FB postings have been wiped from the Internet with her death. And here's another one that was disappeared from the Web. Nabarro's story concerned the valet named Chad Nishimura who parked Paddock’s car and told Nabarro that he chatted with Paddock briefly before parking his vehicle. He said that Paddock “seemed normal”and that he “didn’t have any bags with him upon arrival”. Well, that story has been completely scrubbed from the Internet as well as have Nishimura's social media accounts. Even his Linkedin profile.

It's hard to envisage an innocent explanation for these developments. Which in turn suggests that there's a conspiracy afoot. If so what's it all about? As of now we don't know despite many confident assertions to the contrary. And on the subject of conspiracies, what's the deal with Harvey Weinstein? One of the most powerful men in Hollywood, Jewish, strong supporter of Democratic and "liberal" causes, gets thrown to the wolves for.....casting couch antics? And it wasn't just the fact that he was 'exposed' so to speak. The whole thing seemed to be carefully orchestrated, everybody coming out of the woodwork at the same time, obliterating him within a matter of days. And the people who turned on him were the very ones you'd expect to support him.

All very odd. Will explanations emerge in due course?

Monday, 16 October 2017

Unanswered questions on foreign aid

Take up the White Man's burden,The savage wars of peace--
Fill full the mouth of Famine And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest The end for others sought,
Watch sloth and heathen Folly Bring all your hopes to nought.

The over-riding and all-consuming priority for every politician in a parliamentary democracy is to hold onto his seat. (I derive intense satisfaction from not saying ‘his or her’ seat). Irish politicians, due to the multi-seat proportional representation system, are more sensitive than most, as there's only a handful of really safe seats in the whole country. To keep his seat the pol must keep his constituents happy. This involves diverting as much government largess as possible to his constituency, and above all in avoiding closure of police stations, hospitals, schools quangos or any other publicly funded institution.

Naturally, the pols do everything in their power to prevent such cash-saving actions. They cajole every Minister, threaten to leave the party, to vote against it, to join the opposition or whatever. The pressure on those around the Cabinet table is immense. Small wonder that the battles are so fierce and prolonged despite the figures involved often being quite small, say €10 million annually. They scour every item of expenditure to save a million here, a million there. Always with an eye to the political impact (i.e. their careers). Awful, painful, career-ending cost-based decisions must be made.

As they tear at each other around the Cabinet table why doesn’t someone say, no, scream, ‘why the fuck are we talking about closing a hospital here when we could keep it open, and a dozen others like it, by keeping what we toss away on foreign aid?’  Would not €100 million be better spent on reducing health service waiting lists than on buying jet fighters for the Ugandan Air Force?  Yes, lying on the table, in all its glory, lies an annualised pot of about €700 million which the pols could redeploy overnight with zero impact on the voting public. Yet it remains sacrosanct.

But help might be coming from an unlikely source: Zimbabwe.  Dambisa Moyo in her Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working shows that  systematic aid increases corruption, destroys accountability and inhibits entrepreneurship, fosters laziness in governments and citizens, encourages “reckless consumption” instead of investment in the domestic infrastructure, and foments conflict — even civil wars — because warring factions are intoxicated by the prospect of gaining access to all that free cash. A position Bill Gates described as 'promoting evil' no less. And in fairness Bill is more than familiar with the concept of promoting evil.

So why does the West continue to pour money into international aid? As with most other weighty issues the answer will be found if you 'follow the money'. And in this instance the money keeps a massive aid industry (estimated to employ in the region of 500,000 world-wide with the World Bank octopus-like at its centre) in continuous operation. And here I'm in agreement with the many African nationalists who claim that the aid industry actually doesn't want to cure the economic ills of Africa for the simple reason that were such ills to be miraculously cured they all be out of their comfortable well-paid jobs. In this they're like big pharma which would be out of  business if cures  for  major illnesses were discovered. I experienced this myself directly when heading up the design team for a national telecommunications infrastructure project in Ghana about twenty years ago. Within two weeks it became clear that the project's resources would be plundered by the local bigwigs while designated local staff lacked the necessary skills and experience. I recommended to the WB Project Director that the initiative be abandoned before serious money was flushed down the drain.His reaction was astonishing. He nearly freaked out and came close to admitting that his criterion for success was more about the ability to spend the money rather than achieve the stated objectives.

But that still leaves the question hanging as to why national politicians are so reluctant to tuck into this trough of goodies. After all the numbers directly working in aid industry are comparatively small (although any number is too big) and while the SJWs and their media shills would have a collective fit of the vapours the general voting pubic would be far more grounded. Or based as they say now. 

So..... are there other  forces at work?