Sunday, 29 October 2017

A baffling paradox

I need your help here with a seemingly intractable problem. You see I'm reading a lot about the evils of White Flight which it seems is a Very Bad Thing, having a dreadful impact on the vibrants left behind. Whites apparently 'take all the jobs with them' while property prices and local tax revenues collapse with their departure. Meanwhile the unfortunate vibrants left behind "suffer from" all kinds of pathologies like collapsing infrastructure, murder, assault, robbery and drug addiction.  Strangely enough the identity of those making the Left Behind suffer is never made clear. I wonder could it be the suburban Whites sneaking back in at night? Who knows?

So that's one thing. Now the other concerns gentrification. This refers to the practise whereby Whites, presumably touched by the suffering of the homeboys, leave their comfy suburbs and return to the city. You'd imagine, given the calamities of White Flight,  its reversal would be greeted with joyous outpourings from the Left Behind. But no.  It seems that gentrification is also a Very Bad Thing. Why?  Apparently it leads to the "forced disenfranchisement and displacement of poor and working class people from the spaces and places in which they have legitimate social and historical claims and brings new standards in consumption, particularly in the form of excess and superfluity."    And latte at $5 a cup.

Oh dear. So we have black 'community leaders' bemoaning the flight of White residents from their cities. And then bemoaning their return as well.  I have to concede I'm puzzled.

Thursday, 26 October 2017

A seductive meme

There's a popular meme in WN circles that goes something like this: Whites developed superior intelligence due to the harsh northern climate which not alone facilitated physical brain growth but ensured that the Darwinian Imperative culled those without the requisite intelligence, the ability for long-term planning and the willingness to defer gratification.  The minds it shaped brought forth innovation, first benefiting themselves and then their offspring.

It goes liker this "It is only with the resultant prosperous luxuries that this generation can consider progressive arguments that would get themselves laughed out of their village in shame throughout civilized history.  Indeed, being a progressive has become a way to signal just how comfortable and high status you are. Thank you for the innovations in reproductive medicine, now stay out of my bedroom while I laugh at the religious ethics that was my ancestor’s penicillin. Open your borders, disarm and share everything with the world or you’re a backwards racist hick. This washing machine is great, now stop oppressing women like a caveman."

 This is a convincing thesis. As far as it goes.

However there's an extension to this meme which I believe to be dangerously wrong and with potentially disastrous consequences. "Threats to reproductive fitness can come from a bear running at you, or from a TV telling your daughter to never settle. You see the unfortunate story of a woman who spent the currency of her youth on degrees and contracepted sex with alpha males and then her IVF doesn’t take at 35. What I see is a gazelle who got eaten by a cheetah because it couldn’t run fast enough. To the universe, the result is just the same. There are those who won’t reproduce by their own carelessness or choice.  It isn’t to be fought. It is evolution in action. It isn’t sad, it is a beautiful thing to witness."

Why do I think this is dangerously wrong? Because the lack of reproductive fitness is a function of the deliberate poisoning of that intelligence by a malevolent virus - it is not biological.  There is nothing inherently self-destructive about progressives/DWLs in that they're not like the slow gazelle or (generally, I imagine) that they lack the planning capabilities that saved our ancestors. Neither is their syndrome immutable. It can be cured by administering the antidote to the malevolent virus.

Here I modestly propose my own experience as supportive evidence.  I have a technology-related PhD, have been a visiting professor at a number of distinguished universities, have built and sold a technology-based enterprise. So I'm not stupid and don't lack the ability to plan. Neither am I or was I ever one of those effete advertising betas.  I played rugby for years and in my time both administered and suffered many a physical beating. So I blushingly propose that I'm the kind of stock upon which White salvation can be based.

But here's the point.  Up until comparatively recently I was a card-carrying member of The Cathedral.  I bought into all the DWL bullshit!  A number of different factors contributed to my awakening but the point is I was awakened.  My 'condition' was not immutable, nor was it biologically based. It could and did change. That's why I believe the sub-meme - that DWLs are biologically destined for evolutionary extinction - to be a dangerous fallacy.  Dangerous because if DWLs such I could see the light so can many if not most of the others. Giving up on them and relishing their destruction is, well, the kind of self-destructive behaviour we rightly condemn in them.

Saturday, 21 October 2017

The war against Whites

On a routine visit to my doctor this week when the subject of White disempowerment arose. She laughed at the very idea but wore a more pensive expression after I cited some supporting evidence. Reflecting later I realised that I could have come up with some additional material. This is a vital subject and it's important to be able to deploy the key facts and memes should the opportunity for an elevator pitch arise.

I therefore humbly offer the following arrows for your quivers.

Affirmative action and quotas. This is quite blatant and open. Whites are discriminated against in admission to schools, colleges and various other institutions and suffer the same form of disadvantage when it comes to appointment to jobs as well as subsequent promotional opportunities.  Remember that this is a zero-sum game. Every non-White benefiting from AA or quotas means a corresponding number of Whites being disadvantaged.

Mass Third World immigration.   Not much to be added here other than it applies to White countries only (ever hear anyone say Africa or China should be flooded by Whites?), that it's clearly organised and enabled by an array of so-called human rights legislation and supported by just about every media outlet and international body.

Abuse, ridicule and marginalisation in "news" media and entertainment. The proverbial visitor from Mars today would assume that Western countries are about 50% non-White based on what he'd see in media and entertainment. In addition the heroes and Good Guys are invariably non-White with the dorks and Bad Guys invariably White. This has been accompanied by strong miscegenation propaganda especially of the White female/black male kind

Heritage and culture: The White achievement in building the most advanced civilisation the world has seen gets minimised ('they stole the wealth and science of others'), the Christian religion gets mocked and barred from the public arena, our literature is dismissed as the racist and misogynistic work of 'dead White men', art replaced by its repulsive and degraded 'modern' equivalent while White music, both classical and modern, has been pushed aside in favour of a primitive stomach-churning jungle cacophony performed by grunting and shrieking ape-like creatures on TV

Hate legislation. This has strayed far from its original stated intention and has now been weaponised to silence and disempower Whites and only Whites. This initiative has been accompanied by biased court systems whereby heavy penalties are imposed on Whites for upsetting non-Whites while the latter are free to spout hate and aggression without repercussion

Diversity propagation.   A non-stop multi-channel barrage of pro-diversity propaganda has been operational in White countries - and only White countries - for several decades. Diversity's benefits have been endlessly touted. But never specified. Because there are none, at least for those being diversified (Whites). Note that diversity has come to mean too may White people. All black Africans or all sallow similar-looking Chinese? That's diversity. A strong majority of Whites? Diversity urgently needed.

Curtailing freedom of association. Whites are precluded both de jure and de facto in most Western countries from having their own clubs, associations or residential areas with negative effects on social cohesion and miscegenation. Of course 'minorities' labour under no such restrictions as any member of the Black Lawyers' Association will confirm.

This War on Whites neither kills outright nor inflicts apparent physical harm, yet the extent of its destructive toll is already greater than that of any war, plague, famine, or natural calamity on record. And its potential damage to the quality of human life and the fabric of civilised society is beyond calculation.

Wednesday, 18 October 2017


Several readers have already asked me to comment on the Las Vegas shooting but I declined for the simple reason that I didn't have anything to add. I could have speculated of course but speculation based on sparse knowledge isn't much use. But now take the case of Kymberley Suchomel who had survived the shooting unscathed. Subsequent to the attack she had posted a vivid and detailed description of the events, much of which were at variance with the official version, most notably her claim that there were multiple shooters. Now we learn that she has died 'from natural causes'! She had also written this about when she was escaping with her group after the attack. A  ‘dark-colored SUV’ slowed and a ‘small Hispanic woman’ emerged from the window to “taunt” her group. “[She] leans out the window, and she yells something we couldn’t understand in a clearly taunting manner. It really freaked us out, because again, we didn’t know who we could and could not trust”. Could this have been the same 'short Hispanic women' who other concert-goers claim threatened them before the shooting?

Significantly in my view her FB postings have been wiped from the Internet with her death. And here's another one that was disappeared from the Web. Nabarro's story concerned the valet named Chad Nishimura who parked Paddock’s car and told Nabarro that he chatted with Paddock briefly before parking his vehicle. He said that Paddock “seemed normal”and that he “didn’t have any bags with him upon arrival”. Well, that story has been completely scrubbed from the Internet as well as have Nishimura's social media accounts. Even his Linkedin profile.

It's hard to envisage an innocent explanation for these developments. Which in turn suggests that there's a conspiracy afoot. If so what's it all about? As of now we don't know despite many confident assertions to the contrary. And on the subject of conspiracies, what's the deal with Harvey Weinstein? One of the most powerful men in Hollywood, Jewish, strong supporter of Democratic and "liberal" causes, gets thrown to the wolves for.....casting couch antics? And it wasn't just the fact that he was 'exposed' so to speak. The whole thing seemed to be carefully orchestrated, everybody coming out of the woodwork at the same time, obliterating him within a matter of days. And the people who turned on him were the very ones you'd expect to support him.

All very odd. Will explanations emerge in due course?

Monday, 16 October 2017

Unanswered questions on foreign aid

Take up the White Man's burden,The savage wars of peace--
Fill full the mouth of Famine And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest The end for others sought,
Watch sloth and heathen Folly Bring all your hopes to nought.

The over-riding and all-consuming priority for every politician in a parliamentary democracy is to hold onto his seat. (I derive intense satisfaction from not saying ‘his or her’ seat). Irish politicians, due to the multi-seat proportional representation system, are more sensitive than most, as there's only a handful of really safe seats in the whole country. To keep his seat the pol must keep his constituents happy. This involves diverting as much government largess as possible to his constituency, and above all in avoiding closure of police stations, hospitals, schools quangos or any other publicly funded institution.

Naturally, the pols do everything in their power to prevent such cash-saving actions. They cajole every Minister, threaten to leave the party, to vote against it, to join the opposition or whatever. The pressure on those around the Cabinet table is immense. Small wonder that the battles are so fierce and prolonged despite the figures involved often being quite small, say €10 million annually. They scour every item of expenditure to save a million here, a million there. Always with an eye to the political impact (i.e. their careers). Awful, painful, career-ending cost-based decisions must be made.

As they tear at each other around the Cabinet table why doesn’t someone say, no, scream, ‘why the fuck are we talking about closing a hospital here when we could keep it open, and a dozen others like it, by keeping what we toss away on foreign aid?’  Would not €100 million be better spent on reducing health service waiting lists than on buying jet fighters for the Ugandan Air Force?  Yes, lying on the table, in all its glory, lies an annualised pot of about €700 million which the pols could redeploy overnight with zero impact on the voting public. Yet it remains sacrosanct.

But help might be coming from an unlikely source: Zimbabwe.  Dambisa Moyo in her Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working shows that  systematic aid increases corruption, destroys accountability and inhibits entrepreneurship, fosters laziness in governments and citizens, encourages “reckless consumption” instead of investment in the domestic infrastructure, and foments conflict — even civil wars — because warring factions are intoxicated by the prospect of gaining access to all that free cash. A position Bill Gates described as 'promoting evil' no less. And in fairness Bill is more than familiar with the concept of promoting evil.

So why does the West continue to pour money into international aid? As with most other weighty issues the answer will be found if you 'follow the money'. And in this instance the money keeps a massive aid industry (estimated to employ in the region of 500,000 world-wide with the World Bank octopus-like at its centre) in continuous operation. And here I'm in agreement with the many African nationalists who claim that the aid industry actually doesn't want to cure the economic ills of Africa for the simple reason that were such ills to be miraculously cured they all be out of their comfortable well-paid jobs. In this they're like big pharma which would be out of  business if cures  for  major illnesses were discovered. I experienced this myself directly when heading up the design team for a national telecommunications infrastructure project in Ghana about twenty years ago. Within two weeks it became clear that the project's resources would be plundered by the local bigwigs while designated local staff lacked the necessary skills and experience. I recommended to the WB Project Director that the initiative be abandoned before serious money was flushed down the drain.His reaction was astonishing. He nearly freaked out and came close to admitting that his criterion for success was more about the ability to spend the money rather than achieve the stated objectives.

But that still leaves the question hanging as to why national politicians are so reluctant to tuck into this trough of goodies. After all the numbers directly working in aid industry are comparatively small (although any number is too big) and while the SJWs and their media shills would have a collective fit of the vapours the general voting pubic would be far more grounded. Or based as they say now. 

So..... are there other  forces at work?

Monday, 9 October 2017

The perils of blending

This from Nilus, popular commentator and ace jewdar sleuth in the comment section of the previous post: "Tell me there's not an Irishman that could watch this and not get furious". Well nilus here's one Irishman who got seriously furious, suffused with a cold anger. He was referring to a series of ads running for Tullamore Dew blended Irish whiskey (here and here). No surprise that they're straight out of the Great Book Of Diversity Cliches.

Authoritative-Black-Female walks out on Mewling-White-Beta boyfriend contemptuously dismissing the 'Irish' on her way. This of course is most certainly not racist, just cute. Cut to panel of typical Irish bar-flies, White-guy, Black-guy, Asian-guy to whom Mewling-White-Beta spouts stage Oirish 'poetry' (the Oirish are all poets you know) as he mourns the loss of his magic negress. Then, in a stunning demonstration of their Irishness the mystery meat barflies break into a heartfelt rendition of 'Danny Boy'. See, they're just as Irish as any of us!

Which leads me to my first question. If blacks and Asians (and by inference anybody else roosting here) can be authentically Irish then what does being Irish mean?  Prior to the very recent immivasion the Irish gene pool was made up virtually 100% of Celts, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Normans. This blending over a thousand years and more gave us the characteristics that today define Irishness, the memes the company deploys to hype its products while portraying typical Irish barflies as multiracial hybrids. Inconsistency?

Then we come to the central dilemma of diversity: We're bombarded day and night with the manifold (though never explained) benefits and joys of diversity. Yet the race-mixing that they promote with equal enthusiasm will logically lead to the elimination of diversity as we all become coffee-coloured mixed-breeds. Indeed Tullamore Dew lay great emphasis on the subtle blending that's gone into the development of their products. So they'd be the first to admit that should some naughty employee drop a juicy turd into the whiskey vat the blend might suffer somewhat.  Indeed. Point being, blending can make something worse or better whether you're making whiskey or making a nation. As one commentator put it "a successful blend needs to be poured slowly, be well thought out, with ingredients that complement it and improve it, whilst staying true to it's natural character. "

In conclusion I reiterate my cold bitterness towards those who develop and publish the traitorous bilge that these ads represent. 
Frank Galton reveals that the ad campaign was developed by NY agency (((Opperman Weiss))).


Friday, 6 October 2017

Slobodan Milosovic - what we can learn

When writing on the Rohingya (self-induced) crisis a few weeks back I observed that when the USA, all of its Western lapdogs, the UN, NATO, the mainstream media, all the 'independent' think fact when every official source speaks with one voice you can be sure of but one thing: A major mind-fuck is underway. Hark back now to Slobodan Milosovic and the breakup of Yugoslavia, the Bosnian Civil War and its subsequent bastard child in Kosovo.

Milosovic we were told was a war criminal of the worst kind, in fact the greatest mass murderer since WW II, on a par with Hitler, responsible for the massive ethnic cleansing, mass graves and death camps of Bosnia. He was the master-mind directing Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadžić whose militias carried out the atrocities on the ground. The whole sorry mess was brought to an end only by the eventual and reluctant involvement of NATO whose relentless bombing campaign forced Serbia and Milsoveic to surrender.

And then justice was served as he was brought to trial in a blaze of publicity at the Hague for his 'war crimes'. His death during the trial was presented by the media and the Western political establishment - but I repeat myself - as justice denied to his countless victims. However the subsequent verdict of the court painted a very different picture. Here's an excerpt of the Tribunal's General Conclusion (full report here)

"With regard to the evidence presented in this case in relation to Slobodan Milošević and his membership in the JCE, the Chamber recalls that he shared and endorsed the political objective of the Accused and the Bosnian Serb leadership to preserve Yugoslavia and to prevent the separation or independence of BiH and co-operated closely with the Accused during this time. The Chamber also recalls that Milošević provided assistance in the form of personnel, provisions, and arms to the Bosnian Serbs during the conflict.

However, based on the evidence before the Chamber regarding the diverging interests that emerged between the Bosnian Serb and Serbian leaderships during the conflict and in particular, Milošević’s repeated criticism and disapproval of the policies and decisions made by the Accused and the Bosnian Serb leadership,the Chamber is not satisfied that there was sufficient evidence presented in this case to find that Slobodan Milošević agreed with the common plan."

Naturally these findings were buried by the whores in the Western media who'd have been forced to admit that the whole pantomime was a ploy by our globalist overlords to achieve multiple goals by using its economic power and NATO's military might to destroy a friend of Russia, an opponent of NATO, a strong nationalist and an Orthodox Christian. They succeeded. And they're still at it in the same region by stoking Albanian resistance in Macedonia just like they did in Kosovo. All in the name of freedom and democracy of course.

The sad part for me personally is that I fell for the whole charade at the time. But I've learned from that mistake. Hopefully we'll all recognise it the next time they try it on.

Monday, 2 October 2017

Every little bit helps!

Stefan Molyneux has built up an enormous Youtube following with a platform  that should on the face of it make him a hero to us on the at-right (I'll use that expression as a catch-all to cover those defending White interests). He exposes the devastating impact of feminism on society, calls out 'liberals' for their hypocrisy and double-standards, traces the spread of the Cultural Marxism infection through our institutions, exposes the insanities of the equalist and globalist agendas, isn't afraid to highlight black criminality and low achievement.

So what's the problem? The problem is that Molyneux, himself being Jewish, fails to identify the central Jewish role in the pathologies he rails against. In fact it'd be fairer to say that he carefully redirects his listeners' attention away from the centrality of the Jewish role. That's bad of course and as a consequence his standing is pretty low on the alt-right. And it is true that a failure to identify the war on Whites for what it is - a Jewish project - means we'll never win it.

But I'd still argue that Molyneux and others like him (e.g. Jordan Peterson) that avoid the JQ provide a valuable service. First by the very fact of identifying and refuting the pathologies that beset us. At a minimum this leads to large numbers of people questioning The Narrative of our globo-homo overlords. The biggest obstacle we face is ignorance and the apathy that follows from it. SM is waking such people up. Crucially, many of the awoken then begin to go further and ask how things have come to this and who is responsible. That's where it gets interesting because, as can be seen from the comments section, many of his fans are putting two and two together and coming up with a total which undoubtedly makes him uncomfortable. Even were the editorial scalpel to be wielded ruthlessly what has been seen cannot be unseen.

And essentially that's my point. Molyneux and others like him are doing the Lord's work even if part of their objective is misdirection. They're waking Whites up and that is the first step and an essential one. So cut him some slack and capitalise on his work by using his comments section. Every little bit helps!