Friday, 29 December 2017

Give Boot the boot

Have you ever been struck by the way some 'experts' retain their reputation despite being spectacularly wrong on just about everything? People like Paul Ehrlich (are we about to freeze or burn to death Paul?). Max Boot, the 'conservative foreign policy expert', is another one. Every forecast he's made proved catastrophically wrong (Iran was supposed to have nuked Israel by 2015) as has every one of his policy recommendations. He proclaimed that American military intervention against Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria would transform these countries - with minimal casualties or destruction - into liberal freedom-loving pro-Western democracies. 


Yet instead of being on trial for war crimes he remains a key member of the immensely powerful Council On Foreign Relations while his 'expertise' is eagerly sought by the MSM - a platform he uses to fan the flames of new American wars - this time against Russia and Iran. And now he's created another flurry by suddenly discovering that he's the beneficiary of White Privilege, a somersault that has been eviscerated by left-wing feminist (!) Caitlin Johnstone. "Max Boot is courting Democrats because his war-hungry ideology is being increasingly rejected by Republicans" and Trump in particular who's not bellicose enough for this particular armchair warrior.

Unfortunately most of Libtardia is clucking and cooing at a prominent 'conservative' figure seeing the light. But Boot (or should that be Bootski or Bootov?) is not now and never has been a  conservative. No more than he is now a liberal. As with all the Jewish Neoconservatives (but I repeat myself) his migrations between liberalism and conservatism stem from the perception of what's good for the Jews, specifically for Israel. The destruction and slaughter inflicted on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria were never about American interests but about weakening Israel's regional enemies. And that's why he's now beating the drums for war against Iran and its Russian allies.

It speaks volumes for the power of ZOG that this Russian Jew with such a calamitous record remains ensconced at the epicentre of the American foreign policy power structure.

Monday, 25 December 2017

Celebrating Christmas in Diversitopia

Ah yes, Christmas is here, the Season Of Peace and Love.....and Diversity. But in Western Europe we're having some trouble reconciling these three concepts. Because the Religion Of Peace doesn't really do peace or love when it comes to outward manifestations of their hosts' (as in host/parasite) cultures. Thus we have concrete crash barrier disguised as Christmas trees or giant presents  while grim-faced heavily-armed police surround Christmas markets and Nativity scenes in rings of steel.  Inconvenient and costly I suppose - as is the occasional need to scrape body parts off the ground - but overall a small price to pay for the joys of diversity.

Christmas in Europe 2017

Saturday, 23 December 2017

Our enemies reveal their dastardly plans again

Have we not all at one time or another been dismissed as crazy conspiracy theorists when claiming that White civilisation is under attack? I often respond by saying that far from being wild speculation the programme has been written down a long time ago and its implementation is obvious today if you take the time to look. Take for instance what  EU Commissioner for Migration Dimitris Avramopoulos recently wrote.  
“It’s time to face the truth. We cannot and will never be able to stop migration." "Human mobility will increasingly define the 21st century” and that mass migration is an issue Brussels has committed Europe to “for the long haul”.  “Migration is deeply intertwined with our policies on economics, trade, education and employment — to name just a few. [Migrants] have found safety in Europe, but we also need to make sure they find a home” and admits that brainwashing Europeans into welcoming mass migration ("we must collectively change our way of thinking first") is not only a moral imperative but also an economic and social imperative for our aging continent”. As the millions of Third World invaders who flooded the Continent over the last few years were “not nearly enough to prompt the changes that our societies need" the Commission is now working to “enhance legal channels for economic migration..."

Just in case there was any doubt about the intentions of the EUSSR he emphasised that “it is unwise to think that migration will remain on the other side of the Mediterranean, if one only shows solidarity in financial terms.  At the end of the day, we all need to be ready to accept migration, mobility and diversity as the new norm and tailor our policies accordingly."

So there you have it. It can't be any clearer than that. And be assured that this renegade has the full blessing of his Commission bosses. And their bosses in turn. Whoever they might be. The origins of the project go back to the Kalergi Plan and arguably even earlier to the Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion. The details have been fleshed out in the outpourings of the Frankfurt School and we can see them being implemented on a daily basis throughout the West as Whites, especially White males, become increasingly dispossessed and marginalised.

So the next time you get dismissed as a deluded conspiracy theorist just point out to your interlocutors that it's not a theory. It's a programme that's been openly published. But probably they either don't care enough to know or know enough to care.

Tuesday, 19 December 2017

Georgi Schwartz is upset

I see that Hungarian Jews are up in arms over the Government's anti-Soros poster campaign. The country's largest Jewish organisation has called on Victor Orban to stop the campaign claiming that the “poisonous messages harm the whole of Hungary”. Meanwhile Israel’s ambassador in Budapest also criticised the poster campaign, saying it “evokes sad memories but also sows hatred and fear” while Georgi himself lamented the 'clear anti-Semitism' of the posters.

Which is a bit odd considering that the message simply says  "Don't let Soros have the last laugh".  What's anti-Semitic about that.....even if the demon's Satanic visage is featured prominently? Well we're talking about Hungarians here, and probably more than any other people Hungarians understand the Tribe. 

After all they've experienced Jewish Government twice in the first half of the 20th century. The (((Bela Kun))) regime after WWI lasted a mere four months but in that time turned the country on its head even to the point of starting border wars with some of its neighbours. Its Culture Minister (((Georg Lukacs))) tried to de-Christianize the country. Reasoning that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the Church would be dealt a crippling blow. He launched a radical sex education program in the schools. Sex lectures were organised and literature handed out which graphically instructed youth in 'free love' while simultaneously encouraging them to deride and reject Christian moral ethics, monogamy, and parental and church authority. All of this was accompanied by a reign of cultural terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and dissenters. You don't have to be paranoid to realise that the same thing has been going on in a more insidious form in all White countries for the last fifty years.

And the Tribe took over again after WW II under Soviet direction. This time even though they were more circumspect they still pissed off Hungarian goys who rose in a violent rebellion in 1956 which was eventually quashed by Soviet troops. Many of the rebels fled to the West where their anti-Semitism was studied by psychiatrists and sociologists in the way scientists would examine malignant bacteria in a petrie dish. The following from David Irving's Insurrection (he had not yet become red-pilled).

To a significant extent the refugees interviewed after the uprising were anti-Jewish. The basic revulsion was not hard to find beneath the cultural veneer of even the demurest refugees. Sometimes the sociologists had to probe a little
deeper, but the worm was always there, waiting to be hooked out and displayed wriggling on the analyst’s notepad.

Thus on February 5th, 1957, at Cornell University, psychiatrist Dr. Richard M. Stephenson interviewed young Erika Szalay, a religious and attractive girl. “All the key jobs were held by Jews,” said Erika. “I used to wonder why Catholics and Lutherans couldn’t get these jobs. There were lots of Jews in P├ípa, but none of them did physical labour and none of their wives worked either.The leaders of these co-operatives were always Cohens and Schwarzes.” 

Questioned as to whether he knew of any Jewish workers on the shop floor of his medical supplies factory [another refugee] replied: “No. The Jews always worked in the office." The American analyst glanced up questioningly at him and saw “pogroms in his eyes”, as he vividly phrased it in his report. The man confirmed his definition: “I hate their guts!”

 Oy vey, the sufferink! And speaking of sufferink it should be noted that the two regimes in question were overthrown only with great bloodshed.

Friday, 15 December 2017

New anti-terrorist legislation to make Britain safe. Whew!

The police in Britain have taken a fair bit of flack for their inability to prevent numerous Islamic terror attacks despite having had the murderers on their 'watch list'. Watch list seems an appropriate term as all the rozzers seem to do is watch. Maybe they were too busy with other things. Like looking for hate speech on the Internet. Takes a lot of manpower to do that and ensure that no minority gets offended by the natives.

But maybe I'm being a bit unfair because monitoring a would-be terrorist is immensely time-consuming. Specialists claim that it takes between ten and twelve agents to monitor a single terrorist around-the-clock. And MI5 are trying to track no fewer than 3,000 of them with 200 relevant agents. You'd imagine then that the prospect of 400 new suspects....well actually 400 fanatical atrocity-hardened blood-stained "British" ISIS terrorists returning from Syria would be the last thing they need. You'd imagine that in any sane country they'd be met on arrival by a hail of machine-gun fire and their carcasses dumped in the sea.

Not exactly. According to Max Hill, the Government's specialist adviser on terrorist legislation, 'we must work towards integration and not lose a generation from this travel'. Yes, he actually said that. The country is doomed. But wait! Home Secretary Amber Rudd has new anti-terror legislation on the way. “I want to make sure those who view despicable terrorist content online including jihadi websites, far-right propaganda and bomb-making instructions face the full force of the law for up to 15 years."

Did you spot that? 'Far-right' propaganda right there between jihadi head-choppers and bomb-making. And just for viewing the material. And how do you define 'far-right'? Ah well, that's the nice part. It can be anything the HS says it means. We're told that preventing those thugs returning would contravene 'the fundamental principles of British justice'. But 
is not getting 15 years in the slammer for simply reading some non-PC material a contravention of these principles? It's hard to get away from the feeling that this legislation is aimed more at the jihadis' enemies than at the jihadis themselves. If TPTB wanted to keep those terrorists out they could. Likewise if they wanted to jail them for the rest of their unnatural lives they could. But they don't and they won't.

Our countries are in the hands of our enemies. But we knew that, didn't we?
It's not a crackdown on extremist material as the description suggests. More like a crackdown on anyone who wants to be aware of what extremists plan and think.
It's not a crackdown on extremist material as the description suggests. More like a crackdown on anyone who wants to be aware of what extremists plan and think.

Monday, 11 December 2017

It's what conquerors do....

It's an iconic photo from 1940, the Eiffel Tower draped in a banner proclaiming 'Germany Victorious Everywhere'. It's what conquerors do and always have done. Demonstrate to the conquered people who's boss. Maybe that's why a giant Menorah stands on public lands just across from the White House while displays featuring Christian icons such as the Nativity have been banned from the same location. 

Separation of church and state and all that. So why is it ok to flaunt a Jewish religious symbol which celebrates the massacre of gentiles in ancient Jerusalem while something Constitutional for nearly 200 years subsequently becomes Unconstitutional?


Now you'd imagine that this flagrant triumphalism might awaken some residual flickering patriotic flame of even the most brainwashed, emasculated, feminised American gelding. Especially when in one form or another it's shoved in his face wherever and whenever he looks. Like Sarah Silverman expressing her revulsion at everything her host country represents (previous post) while cheerfully admitting to millions of Christian Americans that she'd happily crucify Him again should Jesus return to earth.

You'd imagine it would. And maybe it will. Because - as I discovered when researching the history of 'anti-Semitism' - Jews suffer from one fatal weakness: A sperg-like inability to know when enough is enough. From Edinburgh to Dubrovnic, from St. Petersburg to Lisbon, the same self-destruct scenario unfolded time and again. Push, push and push again until eventually, seemingly to Jewish amazement, the goyim explode in anger and another pogrom ensues.

The signs of overreach - and hubris-based carelessness - are increasingly obvious even in trivial ways. From John Podhoretz referring to 'goyim' (cattle) in a Twitter feud, to David Aaronovitch using the Op-Ed pages of the London Times to warn that  'Defending White Interests Can Never Be Right', to the increasingly transparent nation-wrecking machinations of Soros in eastern Europe. The signs of careless overreach are there and an increasing number of Whites are noticing. Time will tell.

Meanwhile here's wishing you all an early Happy Christmas...whoops, I mean Hanukkah!

Saturday, 9 December 2017

"My" country's flag

If you watch this short video from Jewish (cough) 'comedian' Sarah Silverman (sample comedy: licking her dog's arse-hole) you'll learn that she became triggered and upset at the sight of an ex-boyfriend raising the American flag in his yard. "He was hoisting an American flag up the flagpole in his front yard. And I instantly felt very weird. It didn’t make sense, but I felt this feeling of like, um, I felt scared – yeah, I felt scared. So I was like, ‘Uh, what are you doing?’ and he said, ‘Raising the flag,’ and I was like, ‘Why?’ and he’s like, ‘Um, because I love America?’ and I was like, ‘Right, right, of course.’ But inside I was shaken."

She wasn't sure why she was so upset - after all raising your country's flag isn't exactly a revolutionary act - so she went to her sister (a rabbi in Israel) for advice. She was told that her fears were natural because flags mean nationalism and nationalism means race, culture, religion, anthems etc. and for obvious reasons Jews hated such things. Except, we can infer, when they take place in Israel.

Thank you for that rabbi and I can empathise with your position. Now can you empathise with me when I suggest that people who are revolted by everything a country represents should hardly be allowed into that country let alone take it over?

Thursday, 7 December 2017

A request to our American readers

One of the most important decisions of our time will be made by the Federal Communications Commission on December 14 when - it seems likely - they will abolish net neutrality (NN). If such happens it will have massive ramifications for sites that support White interests. NN is a complex yet vital subject (if interested you can get a good summary here from the American Internet Society) which is why those of us on the alt-right, even non-Americans, should be keenly interested.  The Internet can be seen as two-sided, the Internet service providers (ISPs) and carriers such as Verizon and Sprint on one side, the content providers such as the major social media sites, news channels and bloggers on the other. This is a major simplification but it works for what we need here. The essential principle of NN is that ISPs/carriers must treat all Internet data the same, that they cannot differentiate on the basis of price, user. performace and/or type of content

So why are White patriots confused? One reason is the concept that my enemy's enemy is my friend. They see massive support for NN from leftists, "liberals" including Soros, and the giant evil social media sites like FB and Twitter. But these elements support NN for reasons that have nothing to do with White  interests. The social media gorgons support it because they suspect with good reason that without NN their transmission costs will skyrocket while the SJW "liberals" support NN in my view out of an inherent distrust of mega corporations, not realising that they're actually on the same side.

Another point made by our side is that NN was enshrined in law by Obama so ipso facto it's bad. And that we got along fine without it before then. That's a common but serious error because NN has been the de facto operating mode of the Internet all along and up to this day. Be assured that should NN be rescinded the ISPs can charge differentially for access and transmission, slow down the performance of White Interest sites and even block them completely if they so wish. And they will wish because Jewish and other anti-White interests control every component of the system.

You may well argue that this is not much different from the current situation. After all Google/Youtube have decimated White interest material, Facebook censors "hate speech", the Daily Stormer was deplatformed while Google have systematically gamed the system to redirect traffic away from such sites. In my opinion such activities are in breach of the First Amendment but we are too ill-resourced and divided to mount a serious case against the Internet behemoths. The difference is that without NN such anti-White activities - and much worse - will be legal.

So, esteemed American readers, please take action to get this plot thwarted.

Sunday, 3 December 2017

"New York's Metropolitan Opera says it has opened an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against the conductor James Levine. Mr Levine, 74, was music director at the Met for 40 years before retiring for health reasons in 2016.

No, I say to myself. It can't be. Not another one surely?

But yes, indeed it is another one. According to his wiki James Levine 'was born in Cincinnati to a Jewish, musical family: his maternal grandfather was a cantor in a synagogue.'

What the hell is going on here? Despite comprising about 2% of the American population it seems that fully three quarters of the outed pervs are Jewish. And given that they monopolise the media you can imagine the number of other revelations that have been quietly spiked. Are Jews really such a perverted lot? (I must say in my experience of them they didn't seem that way apart from an undue interest in the scatological.) But what other explanation can there be?

Well here's one from a most unlikely source: Lady Savant. Out of the blue today she opined 'this seems like a plot to bring down the Jews. Think about it. It's Stalinism in its purest form'. I jolted upright. By Jove, could the woman be right? My initial fevered enthusiasm faded and in the cold light of day must admit to its being extremely unlikely. But......could it be possible?