Saturday, 30 March 2019

Monkeys take over the hospitals

Just saw a report which claims that 'an aggressive troop of monkeys have [sic] virtually taken over parts of the RK Khan Hospital in Durban, South Africa. In a video taken by a horrified visitor, over half a dozen of the animals are seen climbing over the hospital bed curtain rails, roaming underneath bedridden patients and even jumping on to dinner tables. Some claim the animals have infiltrated the kitchen on site. One lady who visits her sick mother and has requested to remain anonymous said: “There can have very aggressive fights over food and they can accidentally knock out IV drips." The primates can carry diseases including TB, yellow fever and hepatitis and are compromising the sterile environment in the hospital as well as interfering with drips attached to patients.'

My initial reaction to the report was 'so what?'. We know for a long while now that the monkeys have taken over everything in South Africa, why should the ominously-named RK Khan Hospital be different? But on closer inspection I was embarrassed to discovered the offenders in this case to be a different form of monkey to that which I had envisaged. Vervets, to be precise. 

Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi said he was extremely concerned and decided to take immediate action. “We must find an immediate solution and I no longer want to see monkeys in the premises. I do not want to see the monkeys in the wards where there are vulnerable patients as it is a very dangerous scene and it also brings with it, of course, health risks to the patients”. You can see why they made this guy Minister for Health. 'A task team consisting of a state vet, health & biodiversity and environmental experts has been set up but so far they have not come up with a solution to keep the wards monkey free.'

Here's a suggestion: Reintroduce apartheid. It proved very effective in making uppity monkeys behave.

Thursday, 28 March 2019

Why do Jews deny the link between race and IQ?

Here's a question I've touched on a few times in the past and which I've been ruminating about a lot lately. And it's this: Why do Jews deny the racial basis of IQ? Much as it might grate with many readers here, it seems that Ashkenazi Jews have higher average IQ levels than do Whites. Richard Lynn found theirs to be 110 versus a White average of 100. It has been argued that this is heavily based on verbal intelligence ('verbal engineers') with a nearly compensating weakness in the spatial and mechanical spheres. To me all the available evidence seems to suggests they do have a higher average IQ and that this accounts for much of Jewish 'success in life'.

Much, but not all. And therein lies the rub. Jews are head and tail of just about everything they want to be head and tail of. Even in areas of traditional weakness such as sport they manage - somehow - to occupy the strategic heights of the main organisations. This vastly disproportionate success has always been a bone of contention right back through the centuries, even millennia. The main contributors apart from intelligence have, in my view, been relentless and ruthless ethnic networking and an unusually strong focus on worldly material success.

The degree of gentile resentment has ebbed and flowed throughout history and there's reason to believe that we could be about to experience another outbreak. I have frequently referred to the dramatic change in on-line reader comments which increasingly suggest that The Goyim Know. And Jews seem to live in dread of this very thing coming to pass, being aware, I would imagine, how dramatically fast things can change.

Given the foregoing you'd imagine that Jews would be leading the rush to confirm IQ as indeed the most important determinant of wordly success, thereby explaining their own drastic over-representation. So Jews are over-represented by a factor of about 12 in terms of Harvard admissions? Why, it's our high IQ levels of course. And black numbers are so low because of their correspondingly low IQs. It can apply in any arena. Simply cite the copious research in The Bell Curve for example to explain away their disproportionate share of the spoils.

But instead they've attacked it with every weapon in their armoury. Steven Jay Gould and Jared Diamond immediately spring to mind but it seems all of them are the same. I don't understand it. They have a ready-made weapon to wield against the most damaging stereotype yet not alone fail to deploy it but actively fight against its use. If - and it's a big if - it becomes mainstream to demand an explanation from Jews as to their staggeringly high share of the spoils they'll have little to fall back on. Leaving the general public to conclude that it's down to collusion and chicanery.

Perhaps part of the explanation lies in the Jewish drive to define race as a social construct But if so it could turn out to be literally a suicidal mistake.

Sunday, 24 March 2019

Project Fear lies and evasions: Where's the accountability?

Regular readers will know what I think of economic forecasting - it merely serves to make astrology respectable. You'd save a lot of money and get a better result by consulting Mystic Meg on next year's economic prospects. But some of it is downright fraudulent in which a desired outcome rather than a neutral methodology determines the forecast. The most shameless example in recent years has been Brexit Project Fear. We can safely ignore the prognostications of the banksters' economic whores (whose integrity is on a par with a judge in a Stalin court) who uniformly predicted the most terrible and immediate consequences of a pro-Brexit vote. And to an extent we could understand if not forgive the hysterics of David Cameron who went so far as to claim such a vote could lead to WW III.

But what of august institutions such as the Treasury and the Bank Of England who were duty bound to provide accurate and impartial advice on what was arguably the most important post-WW II political decision? Since the Brexit vote pay, employment and private expenditure are at record levels, and to the extent that people's lives have been changed it's for the better. Yet prior to the vote the Treasury thundered  that a Leave vote would cause an "immediate and profound" economic shock, with growth crashing between 3% and 6%.  Unemployment would jump by 520,000 under the “cautious” projection and by 820,000 if the exit was on WTO terms. The Bank of England was even more negative, warning that economic growth could fall by 8 per cent. 

These figures were so profoundly wrong as to suggest sabotage rather than incompetence. Although here's the explanation proffered by Andrew Haldane, Chief Economist at the BoE, who claimed their models ignored ‘irrational behaviour’ on the part of those pesky humans. How do you like that? Doesn't it smack of  'elect a new people'? Those responsible should at a minimum have been fired, possibly prosecuted. But they are still in place, unrepentant, no accountability whatsoever. For me it underlines yet another arena in which the country has been taken over by traitorous anti-British forces.

Wednesday, 20 March 2019

Some random thoughts on the NZ shooting

No point in discussing this event in detail, instead I'd just like to make a few specific observations.

The Government jumped in with almost indecent haste to further restrict gun ownership. Actually let me correct that. Legal gun ownership. Because in this case as in every White  country the vast majority of gun murders are committed by illegally-held weapons. It's not possibly for anyone to legally buy an AR-15 style semi-automatic rifle in Australia and Tarrant would not have been able to legally acquire one in NZ. Ergo more stringent gun legislation would not have deterred the shooter. But this comes as  no surprise because the whole purpose of 'gun control' is to disarm law-abiding Whites. Then there's the corollary of gun control: Mass restriction on freedoms we have taken for granted for generations. Almost unbelievably you can now be sentenced to many years in jail simply for sharing the video of the shooting.

Which brings to mind JFK's observation that "those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." The really remarkable thing to me is how restrained Whites have been up to now. Despite an unending stream of Muslim outrages against Whites, including mass murder and industrial-scale child abuse, there have been very few acts of retaliation. And of course the traitorous Western 'elites' who have inflicted the Muslim infestation on us have almost without exception escaped any form of violent retribution.

The faux emotional reaction of the 'elites' has been so over-the-top as to be borderline self-parody.  The local rugby team is thinking of changing their name from Crusaders to something less offensive! Maybe they'll rename Christchurch to Mohammedmosque. Meanwhile Muslims have been slaughtering each other and everyone else by the thousand since the inception of that 'religion'. Fifty Muslims were killed and the world comes apart. But 150 Christians were murdered by Muslims in Nigeria a few months back and....crickets.

Finally that horse-toothed dyke of a PM comes straight out of the Obama, Trudeau, Macron mould: Parachuted from nowhere into the highest offices of the land. Ardern is a textbook globalist Freemason just like her predecessors Clarke and Keys. Forever touting 'globalist' solutions such as TPPA, Agenda 21, Climate Change, mass Third World immigration, forcing 'democracy' at gunpoint and mandatory flouridation. And of course in common with that other 'Labour' leader Tony Bliar (sic) she has been busy selling off key state assets to, cough, 'international investors'. 

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

Saturday, 16 March 2019

Honouring a beacon of love and tolerance

What would be the reaction were a  prominent Christian leader to say the following: "Two contrary types of soul exist. A non-Christian soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Christian soul stems from holiness. We therefore ask: Why should a non-Christian be punished if he kills even a non-Christian embryo while a Christian should not be punished even if he kills a Christian embryo? The answer can be understood by [considering] the general difference between Christians and non-Christians: A Christian was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve Christian. There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Christian life than non-Christian life."

At a minimum the immediate expulsion from polite society, quite possibly prosecution and a spell in prison under 'hate' legislation. But not if that person is Jewish. Because I'm quoting the words of 
Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the seventh grand rebbe of the Lubavitcher Hasidic Jews, swapping the word 'Christian' for 'Jewish'. Not alone was he not prosecuted, he was feted and honoured by the despised goyim all through his hate-filled life and even more so after his death in 1994.

Reporting on his funeral, which attracted a staggering 50,000 mourners and included all of America's 'elite' ' the NY Slimes said A manager for the event, adjusting his skullcap, assembled a team of employees in yellow uniforms for a final pep talk, assigning their posts before the crush was to begin at sundown. “Give me another 20 minutes!” the man barked into his walkie-talkie, as the workers, who did not appear to be Jewish, reported to their positions. “I’m just trying to place my goyim (cattle).” Thanks, great to be appreciated. After his death his followers hung around for weeks expecting him to rise again. Can you imagine the ridicule had he been a Christian?

Sign the cheque goy, sign!
But the encomiums started long before he died. Jimmy Carter was a particular fan, favourably mentioning him in his very first State Of The Union address. But Ronald Reagan was the biggest dupe, holding a kosher-themed party for him at the White House and writing the following letter on Scneerson's 79th birthday. I am delighted to join with your many friends and followers in wishing you а very Happy Seventy-Ninth Birthday. Your dedication and devotion to the spiritual and intellectual well-being of the Jewish people are an inspiration to all Americans. For more than two centuries, the Chabad-Lubavitch Movement has been а vital force in Jewish life and culture and а source of hope and sustenance during many difficult and tragic moments in Jewish history.

His Satanic Majesty GHW Bush wrote in his proclamation of 1989: It is fitting that we honor Rabbi Schneerson and acknowledge his important contributions to society. Our great Nation takes just pride in its dedication to the principles of justice, equality, and truth. Americans also understand that we have a responsibility to inspire the same dedication in future generations. We owe a tremendous debt to Rabbi Schneerson and to all those who promote education that embraces moral and ethical values and emphasizes their importance.

One word describes all of this: ZOG.

Wednesday, 13 March 2019

Finally - the end of the Achievement Gap

Reader Cognitive Dissionance has sent me this link from the Brookings Institute which asks the perennial question 'have we succeeded in bridging the achievement gap between blacks and Whites?' for 2018. Short answer: No. Same as it is every year. So I got down to work and after weeks of feverish research and brainstorming I believe we can solve the problem with the following Four-Point Plan.

Point 1: We know, because everyone tells us, that if blacks and Whites mix freely they’ll get on like a house on fire (maybe not the best analogy, but anyway). However, we also know, again because everyone tells us, that Whites – due to their racism – do everything in their power to avoid mixing with blacks. So here’s my solution. Why not transfer black kids (you can't start early enough!) to White schools and Whites to black schools, to the point that every school's racial breakdown reflect the real America? We could call this ‘Proactive Translocational Integration’, although that's a bit of a mouthful. What about ‘Coaching’, or better again Bussing?

Point 2: We know that blacks suffer low self-esteem. This derives of course from the legacy of slavery and generations of contempt from Whites. So why not build their self-esteem by denigrating everything about whiteness and pumping up everything about blackness? For example we could have something like, I dunno, Black History Hour every year, wherein black accomplishments in science, engineering and culture can be celebrated. Now I had thought about Black History Day, and even Black History Week, but, despite my best efforts was unable to find enough material. In fact, if truth be known, I found it hard to find enough to celebrate in for even one hour.

But there’s a way around that too – and all in a good cause, you understand. What I have in mind here is to gently finess the actual story. So for example Rastus worked in the lab that developed the atom bomb, sweeping the floor and bringing in the coffee. We needn’t refer to this, just claim that he ‘was part of the team at Los Alamos’. The opportunities are endless, well, maybe enough for a full Black History Day. And, just to be sure, we could make it a criminal offence for anyone (any white person) to take the piss out of such achievements.

Point 3. Now as we’re constantly reminded, blacks are always portrayed unfavourably in the media. I mean, when do you ever see a black character in a Hollywood movie, and in the odd time you do aren’t they always shown as dumb, violent, thieving welfare bums? Of course. I suggest that they be portrayed as doctors and scientists, and generally wise, honest and noble. Do you ever see a black in an advertisement? Ok, they’re only 13% of the US population, but you’d imagine that just once in a while the privileged Whites would nod in their direction and make a token inclusion? So that's my third point, try to give blacks some favourable coverage in the MSM, and, on the odd occasion that they do step out of line, don't highlight the race of the perpetrator as is always done now.

Point 4. And now to my fourth and final and most important breakthrough idea.  To compensate for the legacy of slavery, give blacks preferential treatment when it comes to gaining entry to prestige colleges and promotions at work. Even if they’re almost totally unqualified, give them the jobs! By definition, this must end all the inequality! I suggest that this initiative be called Positive Discrimination……. or Affirmative Action, or some such thing. Now I know this might result in planes falling out of the sky and bridges collapsing. But I unhesitatingly say that such would be a small price for ending the achievement gap.

Now I realise that some of these suggestions are a little bit crazy. After all, why would Whites willingly allow themselves to be queue-jumped at every phase of economic and educational activity, see their better qualified children passed over due to the colour of their skin, their race denigrated at every turn, the taxes going to compensate for what they’d see as black social incontinence?

I admit it, it’s a big ask. And achieving it would require a degree of social and mind control beyond the imagination of even a Stalin or a Pol Pot. Naw, forget it. White Americans would never go along with it.

Friday, 8 March 2019

Clarifying my 'support' for Zionism

As my previous post elicited severe criticism for my 'support' of Zionism I'd like to clarify my position. For a start let me make clear that there's nothing material (like say, financial) about it. It's purely a support in principle. And no, I don't expect anything in return as the Tribe really doesn't do reciprocity. So whence my support?

1. Israel is openly and unapologetically an ethnic homeland, to the point that the qualification for citizenship requires DNA testing to prove ethnic purity.

2. It's openly and unapologetically a religious homeland. Israeli legislation provides no option for civil or interfaith marriage, only those who are recognised as Jews according to Orthodox Jewish law can get married in Israel, and members of other religions can only marry spouses of the same religion.

3. It's a home for Jews. If we ever reach the point where their game is rumbled a la Germany in the thirties we can recommend a new home designed just for them

4. Their approach to Third World people is a model for White countries. Illegal immigrants are given short shrift, corralled into ghettos or concentration camps before being unceremoniously dumped in Uganda. Roads are segregated by race and ethnicity and there are other restrictions on movements by non-ethnics. They even sterilised Ethiopian 'Jews' by surreptitiously pumping them with Depo Provera. Many restaurants operate a no Muslims/Arabs policy in full compliance with the law while non-Jews have restricted property and residential rights.

5. By supporting Zionism we partially circumvent the Holocau$t™ protective force field that Jews enjoy. How can you be anti-Semitic if you're pro-Zionist?

What's not to love?

And best of all it gives us a powerful weapon to highlight the stupefying chutzpah and hypocrisy of Jews who push White displacement and miscegenation.

To wit:

You're a racist'.
'No. I only want the same as Israel'.

'You want to stop people who are in a desperate condition from becoming refugees'
'No. I want to adopt the same policy as Israel (and the Muslim Arab countries)'.

'You think people from other races are inferior'.
'No. I want us to be just like Israel'.

'You want an apartheid state'.
'No. I only want to be like Israel'."

See what I mean? The first signs of this are becoming apparent in the British Labour Party and the Democrats in America. Long may it continue!

Tuesday, 5 March 2019

Tommy Robinson: Genius

Frank Galton, esteemed contributor to this blog, poses this question in a comment to the previous post. 'Why isn't [Tommy] Robinson organising / mobilising his white working-class supporters to protest homosexual propaganda being taught to their children? He can easily do this, and as we've seen, it works. So why isn't he doing it?' Well Frank maybe because he was busy destroying the BBC. And doing so almost as a one-man-band. Now how many of us can claim to have done that, or indeed anything remotely like it? You see those of us working to save our race suffer from a serious impediment: Instead of recognising and being grateful for what others contribute to our cause we turn on anyone with whom we don't agree 100%. We have, as I've said many a time, enough enemies and few enough friends already.

In his brilliant documentary Panodrama TR takes us through his entrapment of the BBC in a classical sting operation which exposed that once admirable organisation for what it has now become: A degenerate and traitorous fake news mouthpiece for the globalists NWO nation-wreckers. It was nothing short of delightful to see Tommy turn all the modern presstitiutes' weapons against them and see reporter/propagandist John Sweeney splutter 'you took that out of context;, 'that's not what I meant', 'I am not homophobic, my best friend in college was gay', "You're casting my words in a negative light", 'I am not a racist...I have many minority friends'. Oh PULEEZE! At the end of of the confrontation Tommy struck the final blow by observing 'there's only one journalist in this room John, and it's not you'. The stunned silence when he left said it all.


Towards the end of the documentary he provides a detailed explanation on how British citizens can legally avoid paying the license fee on which the BBC is almost totally dependent. Given that the video has almost 1.25 millions views so far I believe the impact could be enormous. And there's something very strange about those figures. Because on a number of occasions that I visited the site I noticed that the figures for views and likes were actually lower than the previous count! In one instance the Likes went from 87k to 71k over-night. If I didn't know better I'd say that Joogle were trying to play down the video's impact. Guess some viewers must have changed their minds about it. Despite the vast viewing numbers and explosive content the MSM, even the 'conservative' ones, have drawn a blanket over the development.

The achievement of TR and his team has been breathtaking. In a just society there would be dismissals and probably prosecutions. But Britain has long since ceased to be a just society. So Frank G, sure there are other things that TR could do, and yes he is pro-Israel. But it's hard to think of anyone who has struck a greater blow for our cause than he.

Meanwhile another picturesque Irish town gets diversified. Lismore has just  'welcomed' its first batch of 50 Syrian "refugees". Which seems odd given that with the Syrian war now over they should be returning there rather than arriving here. But then the settlement project has nothing to do with providing sanctuary for refugees and everything to do with blending the indigenous White population out of existence. 

Saturday, 2 March 2019

Shock & horror: Anti-Semitism spreads to China

All right-minded people will be saddened to learn that the growing scourge of anti-Semitism has now spread to China. One Jewish writer says 'I live in China, and in the last few weeks I’ve been alarmed at the amount of antisemitic propaganda being published by Baidu News. Baidu is China’s equivalent of Google, so it reaches a truly enormous readership, and is state owned.' He goes on to cite two reports, one of which essentially denies that the Holocaust  happened, and claims that the number of Jews really killed numbered only in the “tens of thousands.” Another article claims, wait for it, that 'the Jews themselves have responsibility for the Holocaust for being too greedy and self-interested. The truth is that Hitler never slaughtered the Jews. Hitler broke the financial dragon egg in order to establish the values ​​of labor. He did indeed shoot a few financial oligarchs, but did not massacre the Jews. 

 And a new best-seller called Currency Wars has really set the cat among the pigeons. The book's author, Song Hongbing, claims that behind world-changing events like the battle of Waterloo, Adolf Hitler's rise to power, President Kennedy's assassination, and the deep recession in Asia during the 1990s stood an intricate conspiracy aimed at increasing Jews' wealth and influence. In fact he claims that almost every defining historical moment has been instigated by Jewish bankers, and mainly the Rothschild family, which Song says dominates the global banking system, including the US Federal Reserve System.

And the Chinese are supposed to be clever. How the hell did they get those crazy ideas? Incidentally the articles and the associated comments provide an insight into the sperg-like amorality of the Chinese mind which assesses profound moral issues like genocide and treason in strictly utilitarian terms. I'd hate to be at the mercy of these guys. 

Like the Africans soon will be.