Tuesday, 27 October 2020

Presidential election scenarios

There's a widespread expectation that no matter who wins the US Presidential Election widescale and prolonged rioting will follow. But my belief is that this will happen only if Trump wins. Should he lose his supporters, with the rare exception, will go back to what they always do: Work and pay taxes. However a Trump victory will result in the dogs of war being loosed with blue cities and neighbourhoods going up in flames. (Not before the most valuable stock has been looted of course). I expect this even in the (unlikely) event of a Trump landslide. While Whites will bear the brunt of the violence I don't believe that the conflict will be overtly racial. This opinion is based on the racial composition of the Antifa and BLM rioters I've seen to date.

The rioters will have been inflamed further by the polls and commentariat having proclaimed the certainty of a Biden win. The same people will ascribe a loss to 'Russian interference' and voter fraud. But the Dems won't stop there. Expect to see an amazing surge in the receipt of post-election postal votes. These will of course massively favour Biden. Again, the mainstream and social media will have had the electorate already prepared for this. If that doesn't swing it expect  lawfare to be rolled out and corrupt judges to play their part in exploiting every legal loophole. One way would be to delay verdicts until after the new presumably Democrat-controlled House has been sworn in at which point
 they'll be in a position to exercise their considerable powers in terms of validating the election outcome.  Democratic State Governors might refuse to certify the results and/or they might intercede in the Electoral College system by nobbling and replacing Trump Electors. Time will not be on Trump's side.

Here's another thing: The forces of law and order (and by that I include not just the Department Of Justice, police or National Guard but also the various alphabet agencies such as the FBI) are all utterly corrupt, more akin to what you'd find in a Third World country. For instance the FBI has had the Hunter Biden laptop for almost a year now with evidence of serious criminality, even treason. But they did nothing. Same with the Anthony Weiner laptop, the Imran Awan laptop, the Hillary Clinton Servers. All of these agencies are desperate for a Trump defeat. They'll be working hard for the Dems. The military? I don't know but judging by the top brass enthusiasm for diversity and the overall woke agenda I wouldn't be confident of their desire to uphold Constitutional justice.

What if Trump were to take his appeal directly to the people to expose the massive corruption? Well what if the mainstream and social media denied him a platform? Impossible? I don't think so. Twitter can cut off his account without notice, same with all the other platforms. What if the TV channels refused to relay an address from the White House? They just say no. What can Trump do? He might have a legal right by declaring a National Emergency or some such but the legal system is broken. Rioters can get away with rioting and looting while the police are ordered to stand down, Biden's laptop is kept under wraps, Pizzagate not investigated, nor the Clinton Foundation. Powerful forces can break the law without suffering consequences. The media will instead broadcast an endless diet of 'Trump cowering in his bunker refusing to give up power'. And if it doesn't appear on mainstream and social media it hasn't happened. (Look at the Biden laptop revelations. To the extent they've been mentioned they've been dismissed as a 'nothing burger' and/or more 'Russian meddling'.)

Far-fetched? Maybe. But the Dems and their Deep State partners-in-crime are absolutely desperate to remove Trump from power. Which actually is the only real reason I still retain belief in him.

Saturday, 24 October 2020

"If voting mattered they wouldn't let us vote"

At least that's what the cynics tell us. And who's to say they're wrong? It seems that irrespective of election results ensuing governments always behave like their predecessors. But maybe America's forthcoming Presidential Election will be of different/ Maybe it will have existential significance for the country. Let's look at the two scenarios.

One: Biden and the Hindu Dindu win either legally or not and take office in January. The following will take place (subject to the configurations in the House and Senate) in no particular order:

The Supreme Court will be extended to give 'liberals' and minorities an effective working majority. The Dems will then be empowered to implement the measures which ultimately will destroy America as we know it. The Second Amendment  drastically narrowed down, 20 to 30 million illegals given full citizenship, PR and DC given Statehood and/or the Electoral College abandoned, immigration laws substantially weakened especially for those claiming asylum, the voting age reduced to sixteen, Obamacare fully reinstated, welfare and affirmative action receive major boosts, taxation dramatically increased, all investigations of Deep State criminality terminated.

The USA becomes Brasil du Norte within the two-terms of the new Administration. America 2050 brought forward by twenty years.

Two: Trump wins and the Democrats accept the legitimacy of the result. (They won't of course, but that's for another day).  Being unencumbered by the need to court re-election support from donors, media or anyone else gives Trump substantial latitude. (This of course will be heavily dependent on the make-up of the House and Senate.) He could fire the traitors in his Administration and in the 'security' alphabet agencies and military and replace them with loyalists committed to his program.  In short he could do most of what the voters elected him to do in 2016. But would he, with Kushner in one ear, Ivanka in the  other? 

Personally I doubt it. The best he could do would be to hold back the tide and give patriots a further breathing space to organise. In any event his opponents won't accept the result even if he wins by a landslide. They'll use every means at their disposal, legal and illegal, to oust him. And there are many RINOs only too glad to help them. 

I hope to God I'm wrong but the outlook is not good.

Thursday, 22 October 2020

The simple syllogism that demolishes the Covid-19 scam


* For the pedants out there who might query whether this is a syllogism - it is. It's a Disjunctive Syllogism. (I like to add a bit of class to this blog every so often!)

Wednesday, 21 October 2020

Another institution is sad decline

The Russian state security service (most commonly known as the KGB) without question set the gold standard in its field, consistently out-performing its Western counterparts despite operating on a fraction of their budget. Unlike the CIA they managed to infiltrate spies everywhere, into the very heart of the Western security establishment, time after time. And boy could they kill. At the peak of Stalin's Terror they were offing 7,000 victims per day. That's over two million a year. Admittedly achieving these quotas for Stalin meant that many an ordinary Dzho-in-the-street out walking his dog got swept up, his evening disappointingly ending with a bullet in the head. But the KGB could also operate with surgical precision, clinically taking out heavily-guarded targets like Trotsky and Bandera.

Which makes the ineptitude of their efforts to murder Sergei Skripal and his daughter as well as Alexei Navalny all the more amazing.  Bizarre use of radioactive toxin elements placed on doors or slipped into cups of tea at airports seemingly designed to fail, or at best partially succeed. They all failed. The victims are up and walking around. For such a dangerous monster Putin - for we're left in no doubt that the attacks were personally ordered by him - must be unhappy with his agents. But this raises an awkward question for the Deep State war-mongers and their media whores trying to provoke Russia: Is Putin grossly incompetent or an arch-villain about to take over the world? You can't have it both ways.

The whole blame-the-Russians ploy is laughably improbable for two reasons. First had the Russians wanted to kill Navalny and Skripal they could have made them disappear while they were still in Russia. Second, on the highly-improbable assumption that they blundered on that score, are we really saying that KGB assassins were incapable of cleanly taking out a couple of unguarded civilians walking around the streets? Sadly it seems the public are applying the same levels of forensic skills to this nonsense as they are to the Covid-19 scam, buying into it with their brains in neutral. Our overlords must be so pleased at the ease with which they can dupe the population. 

Now if only Putin would play ball we'd have a nice World War III on our hands.

Monday, 19 October 2020

The strange case of a judge, a lawyer, a paedophile and a murdered baby

George Gibney (in the news again) ranks as one of Ireland's most prolific paedophiles. Which says a lot as in fairness we seem to punch above our weight when it comes to that particular activity. As a swimming coach he was ideally positioned to abuse the children under his control and abuse them he did. At least according to the seven swimmers who provided sworn affidavits to police
 to the effect that Gibney had assaulted them at various times between 1967 and 1981. But despite these statements and the rumours swirling around Gibney no charges were brought for several years due to 'lack of evidence'.  Eventually the Director Of Public Prosecutions acted and this is where the story gets really interesting

Because in 1993 Patrick Gageby, Gibney's barrister, sought a Judicial Review preventing the DPP from proceeding with the charges. The appeal went all the way to the Supreme Court which ruled that all charges be dropped due to the length of time it took the victims to formally act. Gibney apparently couldn't be expected to remember raping or abusing a child on a certain night, or day, in his car, or in a room at the swimming pool, or on an Irish swimming trip abroad, or in their own house, or in the back seat of a family car while one of their parents was driving. Of course. Such little matters would slip anybody's mind. So just like that he walked free. Gageby, who had developed a reputation for representing alleged sex offenders, then proceeded to bring a large number of successful appeals based on this ruling. 

Now here's another strange thing. Sitting on the case, in what would appear to be a blatant conflict of interest, was Mrs. Justice Denham, brother of Patrick Gageby. She enthusiastically supported the ruling to expunge all charges against Gibney. So good for paedophiles, good for Denham (she was subsequently appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court) and good for her brother who trousered vast fees in the ensuing appeals. But not so good for vulnerable kids, one of whom Gibney abused within a year after he had fled to America.

Irvin Muchnick, the Jewish journalist (let's give credit where it's due) who did so much to track Gibney down wrote "Questions surrounding the actions or inactions of the Arvada police add to the body of information of how Gibney, whom we’ve described as the most notorious at-large sex criminal in the history of global sports, not only managed to gain entry to the US via a 1992 visa, but also has remained in this country ever since — thanks in large part to curious official decisions that have had the clear effect of protecting him from on ongoing campaign to seek his extradition and trial on dozens of both old and newly emerging allegations of molestation and rape."

Now let me move to another seemingly unrelated case, a case of incest, child abuse and murder so horrifying I hesitated to bring it to your attention. Cynthia Owen's father was an alcoholic who raped her from the time she was eight. Aged eleven she gave birth to his baby during the Easter holidays of 1973. She alleges that, after removing the placenta, her mother picked up the infant and stabbed her with a knitting needle (more than 40 times the inquest later heard). When she was certain the baby was dead, says Owen, her mother put it in a laundry bag and crept out into the night, dragging Cynthia – now delirious – with her, and hid it in a lane in the nearby town of Dun Laoghaire. An investigation was launched but closed six weeks later, and the case became another notorious unsolved murder.

Cynthia also claims she was 'rented out' to a local paedophile ring, three of whom were policemen whom she alleged also covered up the allegations she made. Eventually in 2007 a jury at the inquest into the death of the dead baby unanimously found she was the child of Cynthia Owen; that she died at the family’s former home in White’s Villas in Dalkey; and that her cause of death was haemorrhage due to stab wounds. The ensuing public outcry forced Minister For Justice Michael McDowell to order an inquiry. And guess who he chose to conduct it? None other than Patrick Gageby! And guess what Gageby recommended?  That no further action be taken.  

The existence of a massive international paedophile ring comprising some of the world's wealthiest and most powerful people is becoming increasingly clear. And we didn't have to wait for the Jeffrey Epstein or Jimmy Saville revelations to arrive at that conclusion. We look back in amazement at how their likes managed to get away with their depredations for so long. Time after time we learn that 'a file was presented to the prosecutors' and then that 'no further action was recommended'. Or gets "lost" as in the case of Leon Brittan, then the top Justice official in the UK. Gibney seems to have been similarly blessed all the way through, even after he fled Ireland. He immediately got similar jobs in Scotland and in America. It seems inconceivable that the developments surrounding such a prominent international swimming coach would have gone unnoticed by his new employers and even if they had, did they not make even a cursory career inquiry before appointing him to such sensitive posts? And as we saw above he got residency in the USA under very suspicious circumstances. (By the way a concerned Irish citizen warned Diane Feinstein's office about Gibney but never got even an acknowledgement). The Owens case had similar echoes, one being that her father, despite being a heavy drinker and smoker with a menial job left hundreds of thousand of Euro in his will.

I'm not suggesting that anyone named in the post was involved in a paedophile ring. But extremely powerful people, much more powerful that the Denhams, Gageby's and McDowells of this world, have almost unlimited ways of applying pressure on lower level decision-makers, often indirect, but effective nonetheless. Meanwhile the project to normalise paedophilia continues apace.

Friday, 16 October 2020

Will TDS get Joe off the hook?

The scandals engulfing Joe and Hunter ("American Psycho") Biden are egregious enough to derail a Third World  Presidential campaign. Seriously. But there's no guarantee this will happen in Joe's case. For a start (and this reminds me of the philosophers' dilemma 'if a tree falls in the forest and nobody sees or hears it has it really fallen?') in America if something doesn't appear in the MSM and major social media platforms then - as far as the general public is concerned - it hasn't happened. And boy, these guardians of information flow have thrown off the last pretence of impartiality and imposed a coordinated blackout. Even the White House Twitter feed was cut off for a while.  The once great Drudge Report blanked the scandal for all of yesterday. 

The inability of the media to totally maintain the blackout lead to phase two: "Debunk" and ridicule these "baseless allegations". I've read quite a few of these refutations and without exception they're worthless puff-pieces, devoid of substance. However they're brimming over with bluff and bluster capable of misleading the casual reader. (And 95% of readers are casual).  'The claims are easily disproven', 'clear evidence of Russian meddling' and, my favourite, 'the FBI have had the laptop for over a year and saw no evidence of criminality'. Ah yes. The FBI did indeed have the laptop and yes, they did nothing. Which begs the question as to why, given the mountain of evidence on it? Remember James Alefantis, the Paedo Pizza creep. He wasn't questioned by the FBI either and cites this as evidence of his innocence. Same with Lucky Larry Silverstein who gave the order to demolish WTC 7. He smiles and says he was never even questioned by the forces of law and order. And he's right.  

And finally, even assuming that everybody learned of the scandal and saw through the bullshit excuses would those afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome change their minds?  My belief is that if Joe were seen sexually groping children they'd still vote for the ticket. Oh wait! Or if they learned that Kamaltoe Harris had withheld exculpatory evidence for a man on death row they'd still vote for the ticket. Oh wait! 

Yes, I do believe that TDS, stoked exhaustively by the media, has driven huge numbers of otherwise fairly rational people to the edges of clinical insanity. Rendered them impervious to logic. I've argued with them myself. And it seems to me that quite literally nothing would stop them voting against Trump. Hopefully the shocking new revelations might be enough to convince a critical number of undecideds and/or galvanise the wavering White suburban moms to vote for their future and that of their children.

Tuesday, 13 October 2020

Are you an Accelerationist?

Accelerationists base their beliefs (whether knowingly or not) on Lenin's dictum 'worse is better' as a means of bringing about the collapse of the existing order. The worse things get the more likely the proletariat are to rise up against their oppressors. Accelerationists take this a step further in that they believe the sooner the 'worse' happens the better. Accelerationists on what I'll call (for want of a better term) the alt-right feel this way about next month's elections in America. Voting won't make any difference (if it did they wouldn't allow it) and even were Trump and the Republicans to regain power it would only postpone the inevitable sundering of the nation, rendering an eventual solution all the more intractable.

Were the Dems to take full control in the elections (so their thinking goes) they'll go mad, unleashing an orgy of welfare spending, taxation of the the middle class, anti-White affirmative action, Section 8 on steroids, legalise all thirty million illegals, throw open the borders, and allow unfettered lawlessness on the streets. This in turn would drive Whites to rise up and demand separation into a White homeland or multiples thereof. And they're probably right. Whites might well demand such a thing. But here's the catch: The Dems won't allow it. Apart from their (large) lunatic fringe the rest fully understand the extent to which they're dependent on productive Whites. They realise an America sans Whites quickly becomes Detroit or Baltimore writ large.

How will they block it? Well prevailing legislation makes it impossible for a State to secede in the absence of Federal approval. Federal approval will not be forthcoming. The hugely expanded Supreme Court, packed with blacks, Latinos and Muslims will vote as dictated by their Third World genetic programming: For Their Own. Big Tech and the alphabet "security" agencies will be on hand to monitor, censor and subvert nascent White resistance. The financial services parasites will refuse to process transactions while the MSM will maintain a barrage of wartime-scale propaganda. Meanwhile with thirty million newly-enfranchised illegals the Dems will have a bullet-proof majority for long enough to ensure the end of the USA and its replacement by Brasil do Norte.

Would even a sweeping Trump/Republican victory prevent this doomsday scenario? Almost certainly not. But at least there's a chance. The last chance for Heritage America. Americans should vote accordingly

Sunday, 11 October 2020

"Trust the science, follow the expert advice"

Thus we are instructed by our moral superiors. "Trust the science, follow the expert advice". But what if the science is unclear and the experts wrong?

On Jan. 21, the day the first Covid-19 case in the U.S. was confirmed Anthony Fauci said the following on Newsmax TV: “This is not a major threat to the people of the United States, and this is not something that the citizens of the United States right now should be worried about.” Shortly afterwards he said in an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine that 
Covid-19 would be no more dangerous than common influenza. Two months later he and CDC Director Robert Redfield proclaimed it to be "the greatest public health crisis that has hit this nation in more than 100 years.”  The WHO's latest mortality rate figures (this week) show that only 0.13 percent of those infected will die. That’s 26 times lower than WHO’s originally suggested death rate of 3.4 percent. This 0.13 percent death rate is almost exactly the death rate for the common flu.

"Trust the science, follow the expert advice"

In March of this year Professor Neil Ferguson, head of the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis at Imperial College London, issued a horrifying report which projected 500,000 deaths in the UK arising from the Covid virus. But not long after that he revised the half a million to just a few thousand. Just like that! Some expert. But he had form going back many years. In 2002 he predicted that up to 50,000 people in UK would die from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (“mad cow disease”) possibly to 150,000 if the epidemic expanded to include sheep. How many actually died? A grand total of 178. In 2005 he forecast up to 200 million deaths worldwide from H5N1 ("bird flu"). The eventual body count? 78. No, not 78 million, 78 people. That model might need a bit of work, Neil. Then in 2009 he warned that H1N1 ("swine flu") would kill 65,000 people in Britain. The eventual body count? 457. Not 457,000 - 457 deaths. Similar doomsday Covid fatality figures have been published by other prestigious research organisations.

Trust the science, follow the expert advice

The effectiveness of masks has been in dispute from the onset of the plandemic. The head of infectious diseases at the Netherlands’ National Institute for Public Health (RIVM), Jaap van Dissel, has argued there is no scientific proof of cloth masks’ effectiveness, and that they might in fact do more harm than good. US Surgeon General Jerome Adams on Feb. 29 beseeched the public as follows: "Seriously people — STOP BUYING MASKS!” The CDC initially said "if you are NOT sick you do not need to wear a facemask unless you are caring for someone who is sick (and they are not able to wear a facemask)". The effectiveness of masks remains to this day - to put it mildly - under dispute. Yet moves are afoot in most Western countries to make mask wearing mandatory.

Trust the science, follow the expert advice

Originally the WHO and other experts warned that Covid-19 can be spread from contact with contaminated surfaces and objects. This in turn lead to the use of surgical gloves and the maniacal scrubbing of door handles and table surfaces that we've all seen. Such warnings, while not withdrawn, have been discreetly slipped down the Memory Hole. Same with ventilators. Remember them? We needed hundreds of thousands to be produced.  NOW! Until the experts found that they were killing more patients than they were saving as evidenced by a 
study of 2,600 New York City patients which found an 88% death rate among Covid-19 patients placed on respirators.

Trust the science, follow the expert advice

The Lancet, arguably the most venerable medical journal, published an article earlier this year headlined “Hydroxychloroquine: Trump’s Covid-19 ‘cure' increases deaths, global study finds.” Shortly afterwards they published a full retraction and withdrew the paper Just like that.

Trust the science, follow the expert advice

The foregoing brief summaries show that the experts have, at one time or another, been wrong, sometimes catastrophically so, on just about everything of substance related to this virus. Maybe I should correct that. The experts who dominate the discourse have been wrong. Many others, voices crying in the wilderness, have been calling out the hoax from the beginning. Their numbers have grown of late. Take for instance the Great Barrington Declaration which has now been signed by nearly 6,000 scientists and medical experts across the globe as well as 50,000 members of the public. They say keeping the lockdown policies in place until a vaccine is available would cause "irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed". Yet we see pressure for more draconian lock-down measures all over the West.

So who do we believe?

My suggestion: Our belief should be guided by the knowledge that the Covid-19 Project represents one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on the public.

Wednesday, 7 October 2020

Trump's media vilifiers

“Sociopathy”: Psychiatrist says Trump's behavior “meets criteria for a locked psychiatric facility".  It "would not be an exaggeration" to say that Trump "delights in putting people in danger," Dr. Bandy X. Lee says. 

In this case the shrink is a Chink. And that's par for the course. Have you noticed it too? Have you noticed the overwhelming preponderance of non-White "Americans" that dominate the anti-Trump media frenzy?

Well I have and I've been taking notes. I see blacks, Jews, Turks, Armenians, Indians, Pakistanis, Chinese, Mexicans, Koreans, Somalis, Iranians and sundry more slandering and vilifying America's President on any and every media platform, all of the time. Whatever about blacks who've (unfortunately) been in America for hundreds of years, most of the rest are relative newcomers and visibly "non-American" in the common meaning of the term. Yet they feel utterly unabashed at tearing into the democratically-elected President of their adopted country.  They, like Ireland's part Pakistani-Hindu former PM and Britain's Stupidest Man David Lammy, never cease hectoring us that 'this is not what we are' (note the 'we') when the indigenous people step out of line.

I remember when working in Saudi Arabia highly-placed locals would seek to trap you into making critical comments of the country, its rulers or its religion. Step out of line and you were in deep trouble. Despite the warnings I fell into the trap when asked by a local bigwig for my views on the Saudi "justice" system. Managing a lucrative consultancy contract I hastened to assure him of my unalloyed admiration. 'Have you no fears at all?' he gently prompted me. To the horror of my Coptic Christian colleague I admitted that well, you know, if I had a car crash with a Saudi the court would probably favour the latter. 'But that's all' I hastily added. Next day our contract was cancelled on very unfair terms to us.

Just recently an American was jailed in Thailand for giving a holiday report a bad review. Seriously. And I  remember speaking to a Syrian tennis coach in Dubai who even over there - Dubai - and in private refused to discuss the Assad regime. He admitted he was afraid.  I received warning about criticising Royalty or top political figures throughout the Arab world as well as in Pakistan, China and many other countries. Laying into such figures on public media - not possible of course  - would have resulted in a lengthy jail sentence. If not worse. 

So even as an Irish guy I feel outraged at their effrontery. For them I recommend the crudes of all of xenophobic insults: "If you don't like it here fuck off back to whatever hell hole you came from".

Monday, 5 October 2020

Trump & Covid: The elephant in the room

 So it looks like President Trump is making a quick return to good health. This despite the fervent wishes of the tolerant and caring liberals that he'd die in severe discomfort. How they squealed and gloated. "See, he downplayed the threat and now he has it! He's finished. Ha ha ha."  In fact Donald's rapid recovery has betrayed the fundamental weakness of their position and by extension that of the whole Covid scam. Because this is not the deadly virus its touts proclaim it to be. It's probably a little worse than most flu epidemics (especially for the oldest age cohort) but is nothing out of the ordinary. Certainly its impact doesn't go next or near to justifying the scaremongering and panic being used to lock down and subdue whole nations. Reminder: For people under the age of 60 the survival rate for those infected is in excess of 99%. Yes, 99%. Even for those of the President's age the survival rate is about 95%. 

So with their premature celebration of his demise the libtards have highlighted the non-exceptional lethality of the virus and in doing so made themselves look even more ridiculous and hypocritical than usual.

Saturday, 3 October 2020

British police: A mixed bag

Sometimes the British Police Force can perform like a well-oiled machine, operating with smooth efficiency and at lightning speed. Like this case when a supporter in a crowd of 75,000 make a monkey gesture towards a black footballer. Within minutes the cops arrived, sirens wailing, blue lights flashing. Thanks to the wonders of modern technology a crack team of police experts quickly managed to identify, arrest and jail the criminal. And it seems that breaches of the new social distancing guidelines can elicit a similar dynamic response.

But other times they're not so efficient, like recently when a knife-wielding murderer rampaged through the streets of Birmingham, stabbing and slashing at passers-by, killing one and seriously wounding many more. You might imagine that this would elicit a sharpish response from the forces of law and order. After all it's kinda' what they're all about. If so you'd be wrong. It took more than two hours - that's TWO HOURS - before they showed up, at which point presumably the murderer had collapsed in an exhausted heap from all the stabbing. Which is tiring work.

The police provided no description of the offender. Isn't that amazing? They also enjoined the public 'not to speculate as to motive' which apparently, you've guessed it, would be 'inappropriate'. Despite this they immediately engaged in speculation by announcing that there was no reason to believe the attack was 'motivated by hate'. Really? What then? A deep love for humanity? An unquenchable thirst to spread joy and gaiety among the Brummies?

But most of us are now getting wise to the routine. The lack of description tells us that the murderer was black and/or Muslim. Assuring us that he was not motivated by 'hate' tells us the same thing. Because attacks based on race cannot be hate if the victims are White. Attacks based on religion cannot be hate if the victims are Christians. 

Did you know that only 6% of crimes in England and Wales are solved? Which means that fewer than 3% result in a conviction. That's some achievement, isn't it? Reporting a robbery today is not just pointless, it could lead to your becoming an object of suspicion yourself. Such is the sorry state of policing in Britain today. The British bobby of legend has now become just that: A legend. Hardly surprising when people like these are at the helm of law enforcement. But in one sense you can't blame them. They are merely acting out the Third World biological programming they carry in their genes. 

The real question is how the reins of British justice were handed over to such people. And who was responsible for the handover.

Some time ago I wrote this about Britain (it could apply to most Western countries) 

The British State and its agents no longer serve the British people, instead they actively work against their interests, operating as an administrative and enforcement arm of the NWO globalist oligarchy. It's abundantly clear that their role and objective is to dispossess and ultimately marginalise the native people while corrupting and debasing the institutions that made Britain Great. They asset-strip the country and expend blood and treasure in foreign wars of no relevance to the people, all at the behest of their NWO globalist overlords. There was a time, not so long ago, when such people would have been hanged for High Treason.

Wednesday, 30 September 2020

Dopey Joe's first diplomatic triumph

Well Dopey Joe didn't fall over during the first debate, nor did he crap himself onstage as did his good buddy Gerry Nadler, nor did he come out with one of his specials, like saying 200 million Americans have died of Covid-19. Or asking his supporters to vote for Trump. Yes, the bar was low. So low that his supporters have seized on his telling a sitting President to 'shut up' as a triumph. They're even getting sweatshirts made up to celebrate this achievement apparently.

Joe has of course an unalloyed record of gaffes and failures, which nonetheless enabled him to fail upwards throughout his career. I remember being amused many years ago when the then Vice-President took it upon himself to improve Chinese-American relations. Selling out American manufacturing to them wasn't enough, Joe wanted more. And he had a plan. Bring over a team of ghetto thugs from DC to play basketball against the locals.

With predictable results. Anyone with the remotest knowledge of the Chinese people – which obviously excludes Joe and his team of expert advisors – knows that they hate and despise blacks. They, like the Indians, operate a rigid pigmentocracy, pale at the top, dark at the bottom. As Nature intended. You can therefore imagine the Chinese team's reaction when they ran onto the court and found the ‘American’ team to be made up entirely of the despised ones. Things were niggly (ahem) from early on, apparently, and boiled over when one the Georgetown players kicked a chink. Cue for the locals to explode into action and administer a good whacking to the thugs.

Now I'm not saying who’s to blame for the fracas although it must have been the 'hood rats. I have two points really. First, as I said, how daft was it of Joe to send a team of blacks to China to foster sporting relations? The second was the way the thugs responded. It seems to me that a group of non-blacks fighting back, vigorously, took them completely by surprise. They were too used to 5:1 odds in beating up defenseless whites back home without retaliation. They ended up fleeing the arena without even finishing the game (or the fight). A happy ending.

Can’t wait for the day the Chinese take over Africa. The locals will pray for whitey’s return.

Monday, 28 September 2020

Covid trade-offs

 "You might have the right to endanger your own life but you have no right to endanger the lives of others". To the strutting, preening Covid Karens this represents the ultimate argument in favour of masks and lockdowns. But as with everything else to do with the Covid hoax this argument falls at the first hurdle. Because we do have the right to engage in activities that potentially endanger the lives of others. The most glaring example lies is driving a motor vehicle. Every time we drive off into traffic the lives of others are potentially at risk. (Note: If my wife is at the wheel these odds soar).

Even in a small country like Ireland we could save over 300 lives every year by banning driving. Or even by enforcing a 10 m.p.h. speed limit. So "if even a single life can be saved...." - another Covid Karen favourite - doesn't apply when it comes to being inconvenienced by severe driving restrictions. And here's another perspective.  Some of you might remember a bad bus crash in England some years back, involving multiple fatalities, caused by the driver succumbing to a sudden heart attack. He had been diagnosed with an apparently mild heart condition some years previously and had been undergoing treatment. Should he have been deprived of his livelihood because of the potential risk represented by his condition? Given the high proportion of drivers today with dodgy hearts I believe such a restriction would be decisively rejected by the public. And what about airplanes too small to have a co-pilot? If the pilot becomes disabled for some physical or mental reason the crew and passngers are doomed. But such planes are in the air every day.

And here's the piece de resistance. Vaccines. You can be assured that once Big Pharma produces a "cure" for Covid-19 the pressure for mandatory vaccination will be overwhelming. Not necessarily as in police breaking down your door to force a needle into your arm (although developments in Victoria suggest such a scenario to be very much on the cards) but more by making ordinary life impossible without your 'digital passport'. But, despite the furious propaganda counter-offensive from Medico-Pharma Complex (MPC) vaccines have caused, and continue to cause, catastrophic damageEven Our Saviour Bill Gates has been run out of India after his oral polio vaccine resulted in thousands of casualties (the actual numbers are in dispute). 

The point is this: Death and serious injuries are part of living. Trade-offs have to be made that seek to balance the risks to a minority against the general well-being of the majority. We can debate and philosophise about the abstract issues involved such as the value of a human life but society generally has made its position clear: Your right not to be endangered directly or indirectly by others is not absolute.

Point that out to the next Covid Karen who starts hectoring you.

Friday, 25 September 2020

Couldn't have said it better myself Johnny

I read this comment from a Johnny Kay - on Denver CBS Local no less - which brilliantly summarises and contextualises the whole Covid-19 fraud.  Over to you Johnny!

The starting point for knowing the truth about anything is to believe the opposite of what the government and the corporate media tell us. 
The coronavirus “pandemic” is a fraud — an invisible, all-purpose enemy to which the government can attribute any dangers it wants to frighten and control us.

The international corporate elite that runs things behind the scenes has taken an illness no more dangerous than the common flu (and probably far less so) and turned it into an excuse for an enormous expansion of government power and an enormous redistribution of resources — literally, trillions of dollars — from the citizens to the corporate elite.

The international corporate elite has used every organization under its control — which is to say, every organization of consequence — to promote this false narrative.

According to numerous studies and the government’s own data, at least 98% of those who have the coronavirus are asymptomatic — they have no symptoms. They are not sick.

The vast majority of the rest have minor symptoms. Only a very small percentage of the remaining group — almost all of whom have pre-existing co-morbidity factors such as asthma, cancer, COPD, diabetes, or morbid obesity — have severe symptoms. Only a very small percentage of that group actually die.

In terms of its real effect, COVID-19 is like a mild flu — a very mild flu.

There is no legitimacy to any of it. The masks, the “social distancing”, the “social bubbles”, the “self-isolation”, the “self-quarantining”, the “contact tracing”, the “flattening the curve”, the “alone together”, the shutdowns, the lockdowns, the push for vaccination, the push for testing, the bans on assemblies and large groups, the restrictions on churches and prayer groups — none of that is to keep us safe, but all of it is to condition us to accept more government control, more arbitrary regimentation, more transfers of taxpayer money to the corporate elite, and mandatory vaccination.

We have been lied to every step of the way. News reports of overworked doctors, overflowing morgues, crowded hospitals, crowded ICUs, emergency rooms inundated with thousands of COVID-19 patients, racing ambulances full of COVID-19 patients, mass graves, and refrigerated trucks full of bodies are contradicted by numerous videos of empty hospitals, empty waiting rooms, empty “testing centers”, and parked ambulances in the alleged “epicenters” of the pandemic.

The coronavirus charade is no different from previous virus panics — SARS, MERS, Swine Flu, Zika — only now the people at the top think we are divided enough, stupid enough, and weak enough to submit to a massive acceleration of the ongoing transfer of power and wealth from us to them. Sadly, it appears that they are correct.

Too many of us still believe — despite overwhelming historical and contemporary evidence to the contrary — that the government and the corporate media do not lie, especially about the big things. In reality, the government and the corporate media lie about everything — especially about the big things.

And a final thought....

Wednesday, 23 September 2020

I'm suffering from Negro Fatigue

Don't know about you but I've had it up to my teeth with black 'communities' everywhere. I'm suffering from Negro Fatigue. The endless drumbeat of whining, bitching and complaining about the discrimination from which they allegedly suffer, the rioting and looting with which they assuage their imagined grievances, their utter and total rejection of personal responsibility by blaming all of their failures and shortcomings on Whites. I'm fed up of their demands that we respec' them. Respec' them for what? Their contributions to science, mathematics, technology and medicine? Their uncanny ability to built and maintain peaceful, prosperous and immaculately-maintained neighborhoods? Their academic achievements? Their respect for and adherence to our legal systems? Their model two-parent high-performing nuclear families? Their capacity for planning, deferred gratification and self-control? Their insistence on peaceably resolving all disputes?  

I have a simple recommendation which will put an end to their sufferings: If Whites are so bad why don't you find yourselves a nice black country and bugger off to it? What's that you say, you can't? Oh that's right - there are no nice black countries. Well maybe, 
Tyrone and Sh'aniqua, that should tell you something. And it explains why even when Whites flee to the suburbs blacks will put their grievances aside and pursue their productive prey to their new homes. Complaining bitterly as they go.

But maybe there are ways we can help them help themselves. 
First you could offer a substantial 'return' to Africa financial inducement. This is not a glib or facile suggestion. I  calculated the average lifetime costs of a black family to White taxpayers to be in the region of €2 million. Seriously.*** Check out my calculations at this link. And this doesn't include the incalculable societal costs of the black undertow. Given their impulsive short-term gibs- me-dat-now mentality I'd say the majority would jump at the offer of a tax-free 200k cheque. If they declined we could incentivise them to undergo voluntary sterilisation. What would blacks lose? Could still muh dick to their hearts' content - and their chilluns aren't exactly the centre of their lives anyway. 

My final proposal is a variation on the rigid race-based authoritarianism that applied in the Post Reconstruction American South up to about 1950 and under apartheid South Africa. Such a regimen was predicated on the correct assumptions that blacks were disproportionately of lower intelligence, impulsive and criminally-oriented, rendering them unsuited for White society. The regimen was supported by a range of segregation laws and a no-nonsense police force aided by other, well, less formal enforcement mechanisms. And woe betide any black committing a crime of violence against Whites, especially against White
 women. Miscegenation even where legal (and it often was not) incurred severe social sanctions.

The net effect under such regimes was that blacks and Whites developed a modus vivendi, each knowing his place and the rules of engagement. Not ideal or fair, but then what polity is? The fact is that black criminality and the welfare drag on productive law-abiding citizens were but a fraction of what they are today. Whites were able to enjoy the civilisation they and their forebears had hewn from the wilderness. Indeed blacks may have been more content than they are now - crazy as that might sound in today's bizarro world - with stable family structures the norm and nobody stoking their grievances.

And the rest of us would not be suffering from Negro Fatigue.

*** Subsequent to posting this I received a comment from Mefobills, a finance specialist and regular commentator on Zero Hedge and Unz Review. A very interesting take on the financial practicalities of the Back-To-Africa project.

It would be easy to pay for removal. It would take something like the Reconstruction Finance Corporation that FDR stood up for injection if new purchasing power during the great depression.
Basically, create a shell company that can issue new paper. The paper is something that looks like a check.

Lets call the new company RFC2. RFC2 creates a check from nothing. The check channels toward a negro of choice. The Negro is male, and of breeding age, and is undesirable for the future. His "now time preference" makes him grab the check. Gimme the gibs.

The check is cashed in at a bank in the targeted African country. The check then makes its way back to America, ultimately finding the Federal Reserve Balance Sheet.

The FED's balance sheet then expands as it takes in the "check" and then issues new dollars.

Negro removal was funded, and the double entry ledgers worked to create new dollar credit.

A body has TCells and other mechanisms to kill off and get rid of harmful agents. It is the same with the body politic, some people need to be ejected from the population, as they are harmful agents.

This idea that we don't have the money for removal is B.S.

The new dollars created will actually return to the U.S. to buy dollar priced goods. The Bill/Check can even specify how it is to be redeemed to prevent inflation.

Any debt based money system, including Ireland's can do the same tricks. Double entry ledgers require some sort of paper asset to enter the ledger to then create new bank credit. The "check" came from nothing, and the new Fed dollars came from nothing. New money popped into being without a debt instrument, but instead a finance instrument issued by RFC2.

There is a very good reason why our (((friends))) guard their privatized money power so jealously. Because the money power is their tap root, and the tap root could also be used for jew removal.

White cat ladies can say nothing about their pet negroes taking the gibs and leaving, because it appears as voluntary and beneficial.

Monday, 21 September 2020

"American" women, keep away from me...

Four years ago I described Huma Abedin, Hellery's closest advisor and rumoured lesbian lover as "completely indifferent to the struggles of the Historic American Nation. Just a wicked, black-eyed, soulless political climber who happens to be one of the most powerful advisors in the world. Do you think she has the interests of the farmer in Kansas foremost in her mind? Does she get a patriotic rush when poring over America’s storied history or take pride upon hearing a a perfect pitch rendition of the Star-Spangled Banner? Is there any doubt that every thought that crosses her mind in relation to the American people is overtly hostile? She is the portrait of a globalized, hostile elite, the modern arch-cosmopolitan. Unelected, unaccountable, and completely alien to the people of the nation she supposedly represents."

Now here's her alter ego, Kamala Harris, a ruthless unprincipled Hindu careerist whore who secretly worships whiteness (the Hindu caste system is racism in its purest form). She secretly despises black people but shamelessly exploits them and their identity as stepping stones to power. Harris’s mind is wired like a third-world despot and she would more appropriately be a politician in India or Pakistan where human rights depend on who your friends are and how much money you have. The idea of the inalienable rights of the individual is as foreign to her as begging for food on the street. She’s a narcissistic psychopath who proudly hates white people and Christians. Harris is a monster whose frightening cruelty simmers just below the surface but pops out at the slightest provocation.

Yet America's decline has been so calamitous that this psychopath will be President if Dopey Joe "wins" in November and is then duly consigned to the funny farm. And remember this: Suburban White women, who'll suffer most from her depredations, will vote for her in droves.

Saturday, 19 September 2020

Just in time Satan answers my prayer

Some time ago I issued a heartfelt plea to the Lord Of Darkness. He has answered my prayer. RBG now resides in the Seventh Of Hell. Now let's make sure Trump gets a suitable replacement.
When is that evil witch Ruth Bader Ginsburg going to do the decent thing and croak? Well considering she's never done the decent thing in her whole life I don't suppose she's going to start now. And few have been more evil than she. Few have done more to destroy the foundations of Heritage America, helping to turn it into a disintegrating degenerate Brazil del norte in waiting.

Just a few examples of her malevolence:

She's called for the legalising of sex for children as young as 12 years. She's argued for legalising prostitution, bigamy and interstate sex trafficking. She has worked tirelessly against sexual dimorphism, ruling for the forced integration of the Boy Scouts and the Girl Guides, college fraternities and sororities, women in the the armed forces (with the proviso that they must benefit from affirmative action), quotas for women in jobs....even finding that Fathers' Day and Mothers' Day to be, yes, offensive and possibly Unconstitutional. She claimed that the concept of husband-breadwinner and wife-homemaker "must be eliminated from the code if it is to reflect the equality principle".

While she claims to be a Constitutional scholar she has flouted and mangled that document to the point of national scandal. First by her blatant partisanship, threatening to leave for New Zealand were Trump elected, her open and unprecedented canvassing for the Sotamayor SCOTUS appointment. Such partisanship on the part of a Supreme Court Justice represents grounds for removal from theCourt. The Senate has that power. But can you just see them use it?

And here's the reverence for the document she's sworn to uphold. In a 2012 interview on Al Hayat she stated that she would not look to the U.S. Constitution if she were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. "I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done." She also believes that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a Constitutional right. I'm sure that very thought was uppermost in the minds of the Framers, as of course was same-sex marriage. If we're to believe what this witch says.

So come on Satan. Be a good little devil. Cut off this demon's supply of children's blood and welcome her to your fiery abode.

Tuesday, 15 September 2020


The Journal.ie is an online rag owned by Denis O'Brien, the billionaire globalist and friend of the Clinton Crime Family who featured prominently in the biggest financial scandal in Irish history. Content is by way of copy/paste from other sources and many of its 'journalists' can barely construct a coherent sentence. In other words your regular mainstream outlet. I click on it  occasionally just to catch up on the local news. I see that they have now joined the serried ranks of  Approved Fact-Checkers, those sites which seek out and debunk 'fake news' and lunatic conspiracy theories. All of these sites have the same modus operandi. Select a straw-man element of the 'fake' news under review - the least credible part of the story - disprove that and end up with a triumphant headline (beginning with DEBUNKED!) purporting to show that as a result the whole story is false. 

So for instance Journal.ie - which is riding shotgun on Ireland's Covid-19 figures to ensure the mindless panic continues - will Debunk! a claim that 'only 700 people died in Ireland in July'. They'll point out that the formal reporting of many deaths gets delayed by up to a few months. Ergo, the figure of 700 is too low, as are by by extension all reports downplaying the Covid death toll. Debunked!. But the kernel of the supposedly false claim stands up. The 700 number would not be affected in any significant way by the late additions. But this small difference enabled the rag to show that the figure was technically inaccurate and thus Debunked!

Amazing Polly and James Corbett have done great work in this area. They've shown that almost all of the fact-checking sites are, directly or indirectly, funded by the same rogues gallery (Soros, Gates, Zuckerberg  et al). Polly cites the example of Wayfair Cabinets whereby identical units were on sale at different amounts, with some being outlandishly and inexplicably expensive, marketed under the names of girls who had gone missing. Deeply suspicious, to put it mildly. But the theory was Debunked! immediately by Snopes, the grande dame of fact checkers (run by a sexual pervert and his ex-prostitute wife). How did Snopes know the story was false? They rang Wayfair and asked them! "Snopes fact checkers here. Are you engaged in child sex trafficking? What's that, you're not, you say? Well that's good enough for us." Thus was the story Debunked! by Snopes.

The big problem is that the casual reader - and that covers about 95% - who goes to a fact checking site won't proceed beyond the Debunked! headline. "Wayfair Cabinet Conspiracy Theory Debunked!" will be enough for the overwhelming majority of visitors who'll depart shaking their heads in despair at all of this fake news. Let me add that those who work for fact checking site are unprincipled careerist whores. Because the stuff they produce is designed to deceive. This is obvious from the way they present their so-called rebuttals. What's also remarkable is the extent to which they're all on message. They are wall-to-wall globohomo orthodoxy. Well it's not surprising actually given that they all get funded by the same criminal globalist billionaires.

A worrying development and difficult to see how things will pan out.

Saturday, 12 September 2020

Did someone mention karma?

So another 911 anniversary has come and gone with the mass-murdering criminals who masterminded the attack  all in fine fettle, enjoying their comfortable retirements, sipping fine wines as they watch the sun go down. Yes, post-911 life has been good.  Larry Silverstein reflects on his uncanny good fortune in having insured the buildings against terrorist attack mere weeks before 911. Double good fortune actually as that was the one day he didn't have breakfast at the top of the WTC's North Tower due to a prior medical appointment. And while Don Rumsfeld must be enjoying his vast financial fortune the joy must be tempered by regret that his diligent investigation into the missing $30 trillion (yes - trillion) from the Department of "Defense" was scuppered by the rocket attack on the Pentagon. Dov Zakheim's pride in his multiple awards for public service must also be tempered by the knowledge that had his aircraft remote control system been installed on the hijacked planes he could have diverted them to safety. That must be killing him. Meanwhile Dick Cheney is having a whale of a time pumping the Wyoming wildlife - and his shooting companions - full of lead as his electric heart still keeps ticking twenty years on.

Did someone mention karma?

Wednesday, 9 September 2020

The handover

Croke Park Dublin is home to the Gaelic Athletic Association (GAA). But it's much more than that, in many ways embodying the spirit of Traditional Ireland and especially its seemingly indissoluble association with the Catholic Church. This standing was reinforced by the events of Bloody Sunday in 1920. Michael Collins had in one morning wiped out the whole Cairo Gang, the crack British intelligence unit poised to destroy the Republican rebels. In response British Army Auxiliaries headed to a football match at Croke Park where they blazed away at the crowd and players, killing 14 and injuring dozens more. Little wonder that the GAA had draconian measures against 'garrison sports' (soccer, rugby, cricket) which lasted for another fifty years.

But as all of us here know only too well, Ireland and the Catholic Church have changed beyond recognition over the last few decades, the old certainties gone, remembered - if remembered at all - with a sense of embarrassment like the mad aunt who used to live in the garret. Ireland is now multicultural, diverse, with out-of-wedlock children the norm, draconian 'hate' legislation in place, gay marriage and abortion voted into law by a massive majority of newly-liberated voters. The Church in Ireland as elsewhere has become a desiccated hollowed-out husk, devoid of self-belief, its great buildings empty, sliding into increasing irrelevancy.

What a contrast with Islam. Muslim numbers in Ireland are exploding (whoops!) and their assertiveness shows a corresponding growth. Red in tooth and claw, the Religion Of Peace is here to stay and wants the Irish kuffars to understand that.  Recently, during the most restrictive time of the Covid lock-down, an exception was made for Muslims to celebrate the animal sacrifice festival of Eid. In the Irish Catholic sanctum sonctorum, Croke Park itself. Fittingly the current Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin was on hand to effect the handover. Because that's what it was. The handover of Traditional Ireland to the New Ireland. Martin was the perfect signatory of the surrender document as he epitomises the modern Churchman - oily bureaucrat, believer in nothing, adept at leaping on every passing bandwagon, master of the bland platitudinous bromide.

And there was no shortage of bromide at the handover ceremony. Commitments to tolerance, freedom and inclusion floated in the warm Summer air. Which would have surprised Asif Pervaiz, a Pakistani Christian under sentence of death since 2013 for a supposedly blasphemous tweet. Or to Egypt's Coptic Christians who recently learned from a Pew Research survey that while their Muslim fellow countrymen strongly supported 'religious freedom' 84% of them also supported the death sentence for 'those who leave Islam'. 

We at least can take some consolation that there wasn't another blood bath at Croke Park during the Eid ceremony. Because, as this picture from Bangladesh shows, the streets can literally run red when the Religion Of Peace gets a free run at things.

But give it time. Give it time.

Monday, 7 September 2020

What happens to GoodWhites in Civil War 2?

The talk gets louder every day as BLM and Antifa outrages mount and White resentment comes to the boil. Even Fred Reed believes Things Are About To Blow. A conflict largely along racial lines appears to be to be on the horizon - and getting closer by the day. But how realistic is this? Whites make up the overwhelming majority of Antifa's peaceful demonstrators and there's a significant White minority even in the BLM movement. Meanwhile in suburban Whiteopias 'Black Lives Matter' signs adorn many lawns. How will this shake out if and when large-scale conflict breaks out?

I don't know but history suggests that in such circumstances skin colour (and/or religion) represents your uniform. Hate-fueled violence has a way of clarifying things for a person, especially if that violence is threatening the people they love. Most Americans are utterly unfamiliar with this. Hearing about it isn’t the same as experiencing it. If it comes to armed civil conflict the choices will largely (there will of course be exceptions) be made for them. People will do what they need to do to survive. Some people will try to act out of principle, but most will act in the interest of self-preservation. The fence-sitters are going to be force to pick a side. And in all likelihood, it’ll be the side that’s not trying to kill them.

Friday, 4 September 2020

Great minds lay out what's coming down the line

An excellent post by Andrew Anglin posits the grim future that lies in store for us. Some excerpts:

"In fact, it appears that the plan is to permanently wipe out the middle and working classes, and have a fraction of a percent of the population living in extreme wealth while ruling over a mass of peasants. This new world will be dominated by mega-corporations. The masses of people who don’t die of drug overdoses or suicide during the transition process will be herded into hive-like skyscraper “pod” living facilities, operated by the corporations in tandem with the government.

You’re going to have people putting computer chips in their brains and all of that. Elon Musk is actively promoting and developing that technology, and I started wondering if his use of all of my talking points on the coronavirus hoax wasn’t part of a plan to position himself as a good guy as part of a brain-chip agenda.

This is clear: the old concepts of rights, freedoms and the ideas we have about man’s role in the universe fundamentally will be wiped out. All of our basic rights were abolished with the opening of the virus hoax, and that is going to be continually played up all through this transition period."

As most on this site realise, the project has been on the making for a long time. For instance here's what Bertrand Russell*, one of the most enthusiastic proponents of One World Government, had to say in The Impact of Science on Society published in 1953. "Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so."  And later in the same book "Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton." A clear exposition of the long-term objectives of the Satanic 'elites'.

Aldous Huxley, luminary of the sinister Tavistock Institute and another leading NWO exponent laid it out as follows in 1961: "There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."

Well let nobody say we weren't warned.

* Russell has been idealised by the left for almost a century. Do they know that he wrote the following? "In extreme cases, there can be little doubt of the superiority of one race to another. North America, Australia and New Zealand certainly contribute more to the civilisation of the world than they would do if they were still peopled by aborigines. It seems on the whole fair to regard Negroes as on the average inferior to white men, although for work in the tropics they are indispensable, so that their extermination (apart from the question of humanity) would be highly undesirable."

Tuesday, 1 September 2020

What did you think of that stunning CDC report?

Have you read all about the stunning new study which exposes the Covid-19 panic for what it is - namely a fraud of monumental dimensions? Of course you haven't, unless you've been looking very very carefully. Because the MSM and the chattering classes have treated this bombshell as if it never happened. Nothing to see here, move along now. I'm not talking about evidence adduced by some 'far-right'  conspiracy theorists or anti-vaxxers. This report has been produced by the fountainhead of so much Covid hysteria, the American Center for Disease Control (CDC). In a truly stunning disclosure they confess that of the claimed  165,000 deaths from Covid to date fewer than 10,000 died from Covid-19 itself. The rest had multiple (on average 2.6) serious additional diseases, the overwhelming majority were in the oldest age cohort.

Now bear in mind that many of those deaths (most notably in New York) derived from dumping huge numbers of old people into "care" homes where they died like flies. And remember the respirators? You know, those devices that the 'experts' (before whom we all are supposed to bow) claimed were a matter of life and death? The experts were right. But not in the way they claimed because far from saving lives respirators had the health impact on the victims similar to that of a neutron bomb. But the lock-down, you say, that's why the numbers are so low. Here are two figures in response: Sweden which had virtually no lock-down suffered deaths per million of 575. The equivalent figure for the USA is virtually the same at 567. Meanwhile a number of inter-State comparisons in America found no correlation between lock-down and Covid death rates.

And for this America (and almost every other Western country) has had its economy and the lives of millions of people destroyed. For this families had to watch loved ones die from behind a perspex shield. For this millions of gravely ill patients suffering from cancer, heart disease and a myriad of other ailments have gone without treatment. For this millions have suffered, and continue to suffer, from the effects of despair, alcoholism, domestic abuse and much more.

When and if the dust settles there must be a reckoning for those who with great malice aforethought inflicted this devastation on millions of innocent people. And let us not forget their cowardly collaborators in the medical profession who could have stopped the scandal in its tracks had they had the gumption to do so. 

But I'm not holding my breath.